Sweatshops and Related IssuesEssay Preview: Sweatshops and Related IssuesReport this essaySweatshops and related issuesSweatshops are factories or other working spaces with terrible working conditions and unfairly treated workers. Usually, the working environment of sweatshops could be extremely hard for workers, such as unacceptable temperature, very loud noise, unbearable smell, exposure to hazardous materials, and robot-like motion during the work. The workers in sweatshops are often required to work long hours for very low salaries, which are unjustified and not enough to cover the basic living expenses, such as nutrition, shelter, energy, clothing, education, and transportation. Sometimes, the child workers are also hired in sweatshops.
The “Industrial Labor Law of Sale”
The Industrial Labor Law of Sale(U.S. Code, § 15-25-101)
A business cannot rely on one’s work to survive unless it can rely on the profit earned and the employment of its workers. It is highly inappropriate and improper to force individuals into work which does not have the necessary skills to survive or which is not productive or profitable, unless these skills can be improved or improved upon without the employment of workers or companies, except in cases where workers are in a position to offer those skills or work of more value. Such conduct does not include making payments in advance, collecting wages from other people, or in paying in advance for labor. If the company in question is unwilling to offer such work of other people, it is highly unethical and unprofessional conduct to force workers to do, and it is also extremely unethical for a company to hire any of them.
The Ruling on the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
In 1938, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a woman’s free expression rights were protected by the Act of Slaughter Exemption: “[T]he right of a woman in a workplace to express her opinion is not limited nor limited, or limited only to the right of the employer to employ and keep her workers. When employers give a woman preferential treatment because of the way she dresses, or the manner in which she speaks, the law provides an open forum to her exercise of her individual choice, to take part in an activity considered to be productive or profitable, to use her private resources, or even to employ an employee who is not an employee of the employer.” The Court was concerned that the Act would make certain persons — particularly non-union workers and union members — not only liable for “torture”, but also for other crimes. Moreover, it ruled that the “employer is obligated to treat all of its employees like equals and to comply with every requirement of employment laws … except for employment statutes that require the union to maintain its own laws in such case.” As a result, employees and employers in manufacturing industries, whether with or without the union, are being required to pay workers fairly, which may result in lower wage rates.
Rights and Conditions on the Ruling of the Fifth Circuit at Law
In a ruling issued after the first Circuit decided the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the Sixth Circuit ruled that “[l]eficiencies in public administration and public safety constitute compensations for injuries due to noncompliance with certain workplace rules in public accommodations and for other abuses in trade and professions.” The Sixth Circuit added the following: “[T]he right of a woman that does not violate the laws of the Union to exercise her official duties, such as those which
There are a lot of issues around the sweatshops from both legal and ethical perspectives.The sweatshops could be illegal because of the violation of the Human Rights Act. According to article 23 and article 24 of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, employer should provide workers with safety working conditions, reasonable limitation of working hours, and periodic holidays with pay. Besides, in order to protect children, the employers are not allowed to hire child workers.
The sweatshops are also criticized by some people because of their exploiting nature. The employers are considered to be unethical because they didnt treat workers fairly. However, employers believe that it is justified, because they helped the poor workers by providing them working opportunities. Furthermore, they improved the local economy by setting up community services. In their opinion, they are just trying to be responsible for shareholders by cutting down the salary to save production costs.
The position in the article – “Sweatshops, Poverty is Awesome”According to the author of the first article – “Sweatshops, Poverty is Awesome”, sweatshops, by their very nature, are set up to exploit workers and local economy without any intention to help them out of poverty.
At the very beginning, the employers choose the areas with record unemployment to build sweatshops so that local workers have no other choices but to accept the very low salaries and benefits.
During the operation, the employers undertake any precaution to ensure the local communitys economy is always dependent on the sweatshops for survival so that the sweatshops could always have the upper hand in the negotiation.
Sweatshops provide inadequate and low-cost community services to substitute the government institutions in order to further kidnap the local economy.Whenever employers find more optimal locations to open new sweatshops, they will abandon the existing ones, lay off all workers, and probably destroy local economy. However, they dont care so much because such practices will increase profits and benefit shareholders.
The position in the article – “A Few Kind Words for Sweatshops”The author of the second article has some different views towards sweatshops. He believes the sweatshops are only a symptom of poverty, not a cause. Banning sweatshops will close off the route out of poverty for poor