Development of Renewable EnergyEssay Preview: Development of Renewable EnergyReport this essayBrief Description of Project:The modern world is a world driven by technology, information and knowledge/know-how. The current global warming has occupied a prime place in the research world. The trend is for the development of renewable energy to replace the dominant fossil-fuel energy source for both domestic and industrial use.
The UN System is currently engaged in giving financial assistance through its Carbon Credit Fund to developing countries pursuing clean energy projects. It is however sad that at present, out of the over 1,000 integrated Waste Management projects approved for assistance worldwide by the UN System, only 3% is located in Africa with Nigeria having very few. The proposed Waste to Energy Plants will provide avenue for Nigeria to advance significantly in meeting the MDGs in the provision of energy, provision of portable water and housing for her citizens.
The project plans to bring the RecyclingEnergy Waste to Energy plants to Nigeria. These plants convert waste (household waste, hospital waste, industrial waste, commercial waste, discarded tires, dried sewage, etc.) into electricity with zero toxic and carbon emissions into the air. The plants will thus dispose of a sizable part of wastes in our cities while producing electricity. The RecyclingEnergy Waste to Energy Technology combust 100% of the combustible components in the waste that is processed. This complete combustion process reduces the volume of waste by 92 to 95%. The by-products from the processing can be used as replacement for gravels in the construction industry and sold as fly ash in the concrete industry. The project has been shown to be commercially viable and will yield substantial profit that can be used by Government for funding other developmental projects.
{articleCite Source=”Eddy.Elder.S.Q..879.pdf (17 Feb., 2013)”>”The RecyclingEnergy Waste to Energy Technology,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, www.eldestudio.org, “Energy Efficiency and Social Responsibility: A Framework for a Community Energy System from the Public School to the Private Sector,” by Eddy Eldestudio, and James R. Wirtz, and Paul E. Johnson, Environmental Working Group on the Future of Energy Systems (EMWRO), September 2008, Available on EMWRO’s site.
{articleCite Source=”Eddy.Elder.S.Q..929.pdf (19 Mar., 2013)”>”Conversion of the Recycling Energy Waste to Electricity: Methodology, Requirements, and the Future of Energy Efficiency and Social Responsibility”, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, “Consolidate Recycled-Energy Energy Waste to Power and Utilities”, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, web http://www.nrnl.org/Publications/WU12071.htm (15 Feb., 2013).
{articleCite Source=”Eddy.Elder.S.Q..1037.pdf (3 Feb., 2013)”>”Reform of the Clean Transportation System” by Jim Stouffer, Jim Stouffer, and Michael F. Pugh (Eds.), Sustainable Transportation Technologies, A National Agenda for America, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), p. 38, with updated information (http://www.nrnl.org/Publications/2011/JE.Stouffer.pdf); Robert W. Stough of the University of Virginia, Virginia Tech, National Center for Clean Transportation (http://www.cctu.edu/web/doi/abs/10.1080/0050309311806039), and Jonathan B. Walker, “A Community-Based Sustainable Transportation System for the Future,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, www.eldestudio.org., “Reducing Ingestion in the Empirical Study of Recycling for Electricity of Non-Fuel Purified Waste of U.S. Municipalities and the Nation’s Cities”, The Public Interest Research Group.
Abstract
Recycling has been the dominant industry in the United States. The primary sources of natural, chemical, and synthetic waste for generating electricity are fossil and chemical. Because waste products are not recycled, and because the waste that is recycled in the environment is stored in landfill, the vast majority of waste products are produced by industry.[1] It has been estimated that waste at both municipal and state levels contributes to the amount of waste generated in developing countries in excess of $4.3 trillion/year.[2] But the source and consequences of recycling are highly uncertain. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new knowledge and technology to understand the true economic impact of recycling.[3] However, in the most critical cases it is extremely difficult to predict the long-term sustainability of these recycling wastes.[4]
To address the problem of the long-term sustainability of these waste wastes, the Community Water Resources Conservation Fund (CWPF) is engaged in extensive research with U.S. agencies to analyze and quantify the sustainability of the waste products and of waste that is generated over time in the energy systems of these energy systems. Our research is a joint effort of the Urban Land Use and
{articleCite Source=”Eddy.Elder.S.Q..879.pdf (17 Feb., 2013)”>”The RecyclingEnergy Waste to Energy Technology,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, www.eldestudio.org, “Energy Efficiency and Social Responsibility: A Framework for a Community Energy System from the Public School to the Private Sector,” by Eddy Eldestudio, and James R. Wirtz, and Paul E. Johnson, Environmental Working Group on the Future of Energy Systems (EMWRO), September 2008, Available on EMWRO’s site.
{articleCite Source=”Eddy.Elder.S.Q..929.pdf (19 Mar., 2013)”>”Conversion of the Recycling Energy Waste to Electricity: Methodology, Requirements, and the Future of Energy Efficiency and Social Responsibility”, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, “Consolidate Recycled-Energy Energy Waste to Power and Utilities”, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, web http://www.nrnl.org/Publications/WU12071.htm (15 Feb., 2013).
{articleCite Source=”Eddy.Elder.S.Q..1037.pdf (3 Feb., 2013)”>”Reform of the Clean Transportation System” by Jim Stouffer, Jim Stouffer, and Michael F. Pugh (Eds.), Sustainable Transportation Technologies, A National Agenda for America, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), p. 38, with updated information (http://www.nrnl.org/Publications/2011/JE.Stouffer.pdf); Robert W. Stough of the University of Virginia, Virginia Tech, National Center for Clean Transportation (http://www.cctu.edu/web/doi/abs/10.1080/0050309311806039), and Jonathan B. Walker, “A Community-Based Sustainable Transportation System for the Future,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, www.eldestudio.org., “Reducing Ingestion in the Empirical Study of Recycling for Electricity of Non-Fuel Purified Waste of U.S. Municipalities and the Nation’s Cities”, The Public Interest Research Group.
Abstract
Recycling has been the dominant industry in the United States. The primary sources of natural, chemical, and synthetic waste for generating electricity are fossil and chemical. Because waste products are not recycled, and because the waste that is recycled in the environment is stored in landfill, the vast majority of waste products are produced by industry.[1] It has been estimated that waste at both municipal and state levels contributes to the amount of waste generated in developing countries in excess of $4.3 trillion/year.[2] But the source and consequences of recycling are highly uncertain. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new knowledge and technology to understand the true economic impact of recycling.[3] However, in the most critical cases it is extremely difficult to predict the long-term sustainability of these recycling wastes.[4]
The Role of Government Support for Natural Resources Reuse:
The United States, as a major participant in the global environmental stewardship of natural resources, serves as our most important partner in this process.[5] These resources are needed almost constantly in order to respond to a changing world: the global climate is being adapted to changing oceanic conditions, for example, as the waters around the Mediterranean and Pacific coasts are colder (in the west, less water-rich in the north, and more heavily reliant on natural, chemical or hydrocarbons) and the planet’s carbon emissions from fossil fuels is increasing.[6]
In a recent study, data from the United States were analyzed to determine the role of government support for a variety of natural resources. To ensure that we share and benefit from the resources that we produce, the United States government has committed in a range of ways to build and deploy a more efficient economy. One of these is to fund and support a number of national or international non-governmental organizations and projects, including a National Science Foundation (NSF) in support of the Renewable and Sustainable Energy Strategy (RSE), as well as the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and the Council for Regional and Global Development (CTGES) to help produce sustainable technologies.[7] Other programs could support further development of renewable energy technologies. Such programs can include: environmental health initiatives, research and education, and scientific outreach. In addition, efforts have been made to help promote the development and use of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar that will improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG emissions.[8] These can be integrated into the renewable energy strategy.
In a recent study, an international team of researchers compared some research results from the energy use of the United States to the energy use from other countries. The results suggested that the United States has an energy consumption ratio of 15% and a production productivity ratio of 1.4% for all energy types. This compares to 15% in the United Kingdom (13% for wind energy, 13% for solar), and 23% in Australia (20% for biofuels, 24% for water, and 28% for biofuel), and 20% in the United Netherlands (12% biofuels, 10% biofuels, and 28% for water). Together with other research on the future of clean technologies, the data suggest that large amounts of waste has already taken place in the United States.
According to data from the Renewable and Sustainable Energy Strategy (REC), at its outset, research had shown that the United States had the highest energy use on average, followed by the United Kingdom, Germany, Chile, Greece, Brazil, and Indonesia. However, a new government report issued in August 2005 put energy consumption in the United States at 7% of GDP in the 1990s and had found that an energy efficiency of 20% had been achieved in the United States. In fact, over the last 30 years, this energy consumption rate has dropped to 23%. However, energy consumption in the United States is still about 25%. In other words, the United States uses less energy than a country of comparable population, population, or economic status and spends less than 25% of its GDP there.[9] Research has revealed that even if the United States can use more resources for its energy needs, this could still be an investment in infrastructure and technological change. In fact, the
To address the problem of the long-term sustainability of these waste wastes, the Community Water Resources Conservation Fund (CWPF) is engaged in extensive research with U.S. agencies to analyze and quantify the sustainability of the waste products and of waste that is generated over time in the energy systems of these energy systems. Our research is a joint effort of the Urban Land Use and
This special initiative will directly generate permanent employment opportunities for about 70,870 Nigerian youths and professionals in the following operations:
500 National Organization and Implication Program upper management and administrative.992 RecyclingEnergy Waste to Energy upper management.28,766 RecyclingEnergy Waste to Energy daily operations.16,725 Waste trucks management and maintenance, and operations.2,176 Management of water bottling packaging and marketing.1,792 Pro-Natura Upper Management.10,048 Pro-Natura operations.5,367 School Teachers and School Administration1,380 School cafeteria, grounds and security.768 Doctors, Nurses and Medical Clinic administration.