CensorshipEssay Preview: CensorshipReport this essayCensorship on the MediaViolence is a topic that is keen to everyones mind. It is constantly occurring and will happen forever throughout the whole world. With the world of today growing at its enormous rate, new technology and other scientific breakthroughs have made our lifestyles easier and much more enjoyable and convenient. With the boom of television, computers, and the Internet, many are quick to blame that these are the key ingredients to what makes a child violent. People are beginning to think that violence on the media is starting to affect our youth by making them imitate what they see in movies and television; legislation for censorship is attempting to be proposed and ratified. The violence in media is not the problem to todays growing youth violence; imposing a censorship on violence does not solve the problem, and might even make it worse. Censorship on violence should definitely not be imposed onto the media.
Censorship on Violence on the Media is a subject that is being discussed by a large number of writers, critics, government ministries, and individuals who have experienced the brutality of a mass media for the benefit of the majority of the population – as well as by those who are willing to deal with it – under a democratic system – because of their love and respect for each other and their rights under the media governance of nations like the U.S., Canada, and many other countries.
SECTION 21:
THE MEDIA NEEDS TO LOSE IT – AND WHO WILL KNOW
There could be a lot of people who would be angry that the press and the media are now working for a certain cause and, especially, for the benefit of their own children – but this is not really the point of this article. We were just discussing just a small portion of the media’s activities.
To do so, let’s take a look at a few points to keep in mind. First: the media is working to destroy the U.S. media. And there is absolutely nothing a media can do about it. For example:
-The New York Times in August reported on a report by the Government Accountability Office, which found that “reports, and the stories based on such reports, clearly identify and label media organizations that broadcast or distribute political commentary on the Obama administration.”
-The Washington Post in June 2012 broke the news that “Washington Post reporters were ordered to cease working for groups and individuals connected to the administration … as part of an investigation into reports they released about contacts between pro-Democratic leaders and the president.”
-There are other groups and individuals in the media who are working to destroy the media that report on how the Obama administration works, how the president is charged on Capitol Hill, and who are funding political groups that are trying to attack their agenda.
-Sydney Morning Herald, which has the name of the media’s official propaganda arm and has had more than 200 writers and reporters working on stories on issues ranging from the Iraq war and the Iran nuclear deal to what the Obama administration is doing with its treatment of its Muslim Brotherhood, has been heavily criticized in the U.S. mainstream media.
-Hannity, another national magazine, will publish a special story by Pulitzer Prize winning writers on the American media and media culture, and it will focus largely on the media’s coverage of the Obama administration and the Trump administration in general and the media coverage of the Obama administration in particular.
-Journalists and academics are also being warned by the American Public Radio organization, saying that the media is “inciting hysteria and undermining the democracy” of America. The AP, the group that oversees the media coverage of various campaigns, has been heavily criticized for their focus on “cringe topics,” and for supporting “cringe-oriented” reporting in areas like the anti-Trump anti-Semitism section.
-Sydney Morning Herald has also been slammed by its own editors for “exposing media organizations that have engaged in political activity that violates the First Amendment — such as in a story on climate change, [or a] story about rape culture.”
-In August 2011 the American Association for the Advancement of Science in America issued a report that accused the U.S. media of having the “right to censor every facet of its content.” The report says the U.S. may face a “deep constitutional conflict of interest” between how the information is provided and under what rules. The group says that any form of media with a newsroom that is “too controlled and politicized can make for a difficult situation.”
-The National Press Club has taken similar action. Its president, Terry Grossman, has warned that the media is trying to “create all kinds of ‘birthers’ and ‘benevolence’ stories to keep
Censorship on Violence on the Media is a subject that is being discussed by a large number of writers, critics, government ministries, and individuals who have experienced the brutality of a mass media for the benefit of the majority of the population – as well as by those who are willing to deal with it – under a democratic system – because of their love and respect for each other and their rights under the media governance of nations like the U.S., Canada, and many other countries.
SECTION 21:
THE MEDIA NEEDS TO LOSE IT – AND WHO WILL KNOW
There could be a lot of people who would be angry that the press and the media are now working for a certain cause and, especially, for the benefit of their own children – but this is not really the point of this article. We were just discussing just a small portion of the media’s activities.
To do so, let’s take a look at a few points to keep in mind. First: the media is working to destroy the U.S. media. And there is absolutely nothing a media can do about it. For example:
-The New York Times in August reported on a report by the Government Accountability Office, which found that “reports, and the stories based on such reports, clearly identify and label media organizations that broadcast or distribute political commentary on the Obama administration.”
-The Washington Post in June 2012 broke the news that “Washington Post reporters were ordered to cease working for groups and individuals connected to the administration … as part of an investigation into reports they released about contacts between pro-Democratic leaders and the president.”
-There are other groups and individuals in the media who are working to destroy the media that report on how the Obama administration works, how the president is charged on Capitol Hill, and who are funding political groups that are trying to attack their agenda.
-Sydney Morning Herald, which has the name of the media’s official propaganda arm and has had more than 200 writers and reporters working on stories on issues ranging from the Iraq war and the Iran nuclear deal to what the Obama administration is doing with its treatment of its Muslim Brotherhood, has been heavily criticized in the U.S. mainstream media.
-Hannity, another national magazine, will publish a special story by Pulitzer Prize winning writers on the American media and media culture, and it will focus largely on the media’s coverage of the Obama administration and the Trump administration in general and the media coverage of the Obama administration in particular.
-Journalists and academics are also being warned by the American Public Radio organization, saying that the media is “inciting hysteria and undermining the democracy” of America. The AP, the group that oversees the media coverage of various campaigns, has been heavily criticized for their focus on “cringe topics,” and for supporting “cringe-oriented” reporting in areas like the anti-Trump anti-Semitism section.
-Sydney Morning Herald has also been slammed by its own editors for “exposing media organizations that have engaged in political activity that violates the First Amendment — such as in a story on climate change, [or a] story about rape culture.”
-In August 2011 the American Association for the Advancement of Science in America issued a report that accused the U.S. media of having the “right to censor every facet of its content.” The report says the U.S. may face a “deep constitutional conflict of interest” between how the information is provided and under what rules. The group says that any form of media with a newsroom that is “too controlled and politicized can make for a difficult situation.”
-The National Press Club has taken similar action. Its president, Terry Grossman, has warned that the media is trying to “create all kinds of ‘birthers’ and ‘benevolence’ stories to keep
In America, everyone knows their Bill of Rights, with the first amendment being freedom of speech, press, religion, petition, and assembly. One is allowed to freely express ones voices and opinions through a type of publication. Movies are a way for one (the director) to express his or hers form of art and genius. By censoring violence in movies, a display of art is being blocked and cut off. It goes against the first amendment in that it is restricting ones rights to free speech. Censorship blocks out free writing and imagination. Creativity becomes limited and subdued into a restricted form.
Throughout the pass forty years, surveys, tests, and polls, etc have all been administered to figure out if violence in media can explain for the growing violence in children. Studies have shown that about 87% of all households own one or more sets of televisions and that the average 7th grader will watch 4 or more hours of television each day, with 60% of most those being violent (www.judiciary.senate.gov/oldsite/mediavio.htm). The website also states that 10% of youth violence stems from the television, then where is the remaining 90% attributed? With only 10% of violence being influenced from television, the other 90% must come from other factors, such as: family problems, stress, drugs, and the environment. One cannot seemingly become more violent just by watching a couple of movies and shows; one has to have a close experience or constant viewing of violence to really be influenced.
The same goes for video games, stating that 68% of Americans own a personal computer with a child on average playing at least 90minutes a day, with 50% of those games being violent. These studies however, still do not prove the fact that violence in movies and games play a huge role in the violence of a youth. Fifty percent of video games are non-violent, or educational, making it even with the violence in video games. It is impossible to prove that after a child has finished playing a violent