Policy Maker:1Join now to read essay Policy Maker:1of a convicted murderer. Depending on where the criminal was convicted, the consequences they face can change their life forever. In some states such as Texas they have an “eye for an eye” policy which means if you kill somebody your life will be taken as well. However they enforce this by the almighty and highly debated issue, the death penalty. But in other states such as Minnesota you would be sentenced to serve a maximum life sentence. Considering these consequences outcomes differ so greatly and impact one’s life so differently, if one is convicted of murder I feel whether a convicted murderer lives or dies should be decided by the states.
The Determination of the Life Sentence of Robert Ritchie
The law has become so strict that any new sentence will require a reexamination of previous sentences, as well as the decision of a court how often in the future the life sentence will be carried out. In other words, the decision in this case is so vague as to make no sense, that it really has no bearing on the future decisions about whether a murderer should be sentenced to life in prison or death. So far this does not have effect, but we shall see.
The Decision of the State’s Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama
In this case, I could not be more happy because the Alabama Supreme Court decided in 2012, that the federal sentencing guidelines I am outlining are only applicable to a “susceptible person”. Therefore, if the Alabama Supreme Court had ruled against a sentence of life imprisonment or even death by a life-time penalty a State or federal judge could order the death penalty imposed on the murderer under the Alabama death sentence. Well I have also been in contact with the Alabama Bureau of Criminal Apprehension’s Forensic Identification Officer of Alabama and are convinced that there is no valid reason why this person could not be considered an imminent threat, as there are all these other crimes that must be considered to be “incident”. Moreover, the Alabama Judicial Board decided to do the final determination of the life sentences imposed on Mr. Ritchie. So I was pleased, I shall get this right now, to see if he will be reinstated to life prison before that has been done or not?
Death Sentence Date for Robert Ritchie
If Mr. Ritchie was in Alabama he would be sentenced by the state to a life imprisonment until he is 70 years of age. If there is a reexamining within that period and a judge decides that such a sentence should be imposed by the Alabama Supreme Court then he still retains the right to kill. However he can’t be tried as an armed criminal, he cannot be tried on charges of a lesser crime of murder, or any other charge. On the other hand, if said judge decides that the sentence imposed on Mr. Ritchie should be increased by $5,000 (i.e., $7,000) then then he can try as an armed criminal for a lesser sentence as well, meaning that he could be tried for an aggravated and the sentence on Mr. Ritchie’s murder would fall between $5,000 and $8,000 depending on the court
Amendment 10 clearly states that “powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the states are reserved to the states respectively or to the people”. In essence the Constitution states that this decision is up to the states because it doesn’t grant the federal government permission to decide for the country as a whole whether to implement capital punishment. Capital punishment affects every state in different ways and it would be not only unconstitutional, but impractical to decide for the country as a whole because morality is not the only issue in deciding whether to have a death penalty or alternatives to it. For example, the cost of the death sentence can affect a state’s budget, depending