China TodayEssay Preview: China TodayReport this essayThe rise of China presents unique challenges for the United States across a broad spectrum of political and economic issues. But for U.S. policy makers and the national security community, the growth of the Chinese military, in particular, is a perplexing challenge that requires close monitoring in the coming years.
In broader political terms, the U.S. has much to gain from a cooperative relationship with China. China is one of the United States largest trading partners, and both economies benefit from a friendly relationship. The U.S. would also like to see the security of allies in the region un-challenged by provocations from China. But U.S. policy makers need to be realistic, preparing for all possibilities. Whether the U.S.-China relationship of the future is a cooperative one or adversarial one, or somewhere in between, is uncertain. However, it would not be surprising, looking back on history, if friction were to arise between two powerful nations with their own global interests. U.S. policy makers now and in the future will be challenged with how to best nurture this relationship, so that it may contribute to regional and global security and not threaten it. In the mean time, there are several notable sources of concern.
• Article VI: Relationships Can and Do Change. The recent history of American and Chinese diplomacy demonstrates how important cooperation is between nations and nations. Although there are some differences or complications, they are far more important than individual differences. To be sure, there’s a good chance it becomes more difficult under the new administration to change U.S. policy regarding China, for it may undermine a stable, sustainable and harmonious relationship. But there are a number of reasons why cooperation must stop at the border. • Some nations want to see both sides of the border resolved before the end of the current administration, and that means working closely with one another to help ensure the security of their countries. • The Trump administration has made efforts to develop better relationships with the former Soviet Union, notably those between India and China, but it’s important that the three-way common effort continue. Many U.S. firms have long worked with the former Soviet bloc, and it’s critical for the U.S. to continue working with its former partner in a way consistent with the strategic partnership that has been created by a strong U.S. global leadership. If cooperation cannot be built after the conclusion of Trump’s administration, it could fall apart. • But that said, each country has its unique problems. To improve our relationship with China, we must realize that it’s an open, welcoming and stable place. Such a relationship should be the basis for building a successful relationship while respecting China’s fundamental human and cultural rights. Such a shared perspective can foster greater U.S.-China relations, particularly between the U.S. and China while also fostering positive relations on the Korean peninsula. • On behalf of the U.S. government, I am grateful you all took some pictures of the new photo on Wednesday, July 27, 2016. One image shows two of our main trade partners (China and Japan) working together on new U.S.-China relations, and one shows the two of them meeting in New York City at a Trump State Dinner. Mr. Xi and Ms. Moon are currently planning for China’s first meeting since the election of his predecessor, President Moon Geun-hye, in January. A second photo shows Mr. Xi relaxing while meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and President Trump. (Courtesy of State Department) (Courtesy of State Department) The meeting also gives a glimpse into what the President-elect and Mr. Xi discussed. As you can see from the picture, the two leaders also emphasized mutual interest in the U.S.-China partnership. The President-elect outlined three key tasks for him and President Xi: establishing the relationship between U.S. companies and China; ensuring that Chinese companies have the full range of U.S. product lines and services; strengthening U.S.-China relations; and addressing the economic woes faced by U.S.-China relations in Asia. This joint effort would not only benefit the U.S., but it would build cooperation between the two countries. If there is to be a breakthrough in the coming weeks and months, we will be ready to work together on other key policies such as the United States economic and trade relationship. And if there is to be any progress on those areas, we will be ready to work on them together. This joint effort will help to strengthen the relationship between the U.S. and China as well as strengthen the ties of cooperation even more. For the second part of this series of pictures, I will cover how it all began: • What the U.S. and China See When Two People Come To The U.S. • The New Meeting In New
— Posted on May 22, 2016 at 1:00 pm
I’ve said it before: US policymakers should have a clear understanding that the U.S.-China relations are complex and long-standing, and should maintain their strong ties to the Chinese market, which they have long supported. The President has done very well in convincing Beijing to accept some of the problems that China is facing and that the U.S.-GMs view as fundamental. And he has committed to increasing cooperation as part of a broader “balance of powers” of the U.S., rather than just the short period of isolation he might have if he wanted to make the transition from isolationist to free trade, especially in key economic sectors. He has not done as badly in maintaining strong co-operation with the region’s powerful economies as he may wish. However, the U.S.-GMs believe China and Europe are doing very well; China should, for example, increase investment in trade by 1.1 percent per year and make major investments in infrastructure, including water infrastructure. Many Chinese think this is a more constructive approach, but I do not think it would improve U.S. relations with Beijing either. Chinese officials have warned of growing security threats between the South China Sea and the United States. China’s “most senior officials” and “special interests.” This is the case if the United States does not address tensions with Beijing, and is seeking to build an even stronger partnership with China. In fact, a growing U.S. trade deficit with China in the past two years has strained U.S.-China relations, and could lead to a potential slowdown in China’s growth in the future. China’s policy makers should have a clear understanding that the U.S.-China relations are complex and long-standing, and should maintain their strong ties to the Chinese market, which they have long supported. As of 2015 the U.S.-GMs valued $15 billion, including $5 billion in foreign currency, between China and Russia
Posted on March 02, 2016 at 3:59 pm
While U.S. policy makers are beginning to see the need for more engagement at the domestic level, they may not know fully what to expect from China on the path toward economic and security balance of power. China has been a strong, dominant trading partner of the United States—in fact, much more than any other trading partner. The United States has consistently and consistently promoted the importance of bilateral trade. In addition, its economic growth has been buoyed by high domestic demand and free trade. Foreign direct investment by domestic companies and small producers has enabled the domestic Chinese economy to tap into the large U.S. industries and to expand their domestic exports of natural goods. China’s industrial development has also led to a rapid transition from one of the world’s most heavily traded countries on defense and technology to one of the most heavily invested nations in its economy. The U.S.-GMs hope Beijing will take advantage to further strengthen its relations with the U.S. to make U.S. trade stronger. The President will have a clear understanding that the U.S.-China relationship, regardless of whether it suits each nation, relies on the common benefits of strong cooperation, and that China should invest in developing its own trade and investment base more widely.
Posted on March 02, 2016 at 4:10 pm
I’ve said it before: US policymakers should have a clear understanding that the U.S.-China relations are complex and long-standing, and should maintain their strong ties to the Chinese market, which they have long supported. The President has done very well in convincing Beijing to accept some of the problems that China is facing and that the U.S.-GMs view as fundamental. And he has committed to increasing cooperation as part of a broader “balance of powers” of the U.S., rather than just the short period of isolation he might have if he wanted to make the transition from isolationist to free trade, especially in key economic sectors. He has not done as badly in maintaining strong co-operation with the region’s powerful economies as he may wish. However, the U.S.-GMs believe China and Europe are doing very well; China should, for example, increase investment in trade by 1.1 percent per year and make major investments in infrastructure, including water infrastructure. Many Chinese think this is a more constructive approach, but I do not think it would improve U.S. relations with Beijing either. Chinese officials have warned of growing security threats between the South China Sea and the United States. China’s “most senior officials” and “special interests.” This is the case if the United States does not address tensions with Beijing, and is seeking to build an even stronger partnership with China. In fact, a growing U.S. trade deficit with China in the past two years has strained U.S.-China relations, and could lead to a potential slowdown in China’s growth in the future. China’s policy makers should have a clear understanding that the U.S.-China relations are complex and long-standing, and should maintain their strong ties to the Chinese market, which they have long supported. As of 2015 the U.S.-GMs valued $15 billion, including $5 billion in foreign currency, between China and Russia
Posted on March 02, 2016 at 3:59 pm
While U.S. policy makers are beginning to see the need for more engagement at the domestic level, they may not know fully what to expect from China on the path toward economic and security balance of power. China has been a strong, dominant trading partner of the United States—in fact, much more than any other trading partner. The United States has consistently and consistently promoted the importance of bilateral trade. In addition, its economic growth has been buoyed by high domestic demand and free trade. Foreign direct investment by domestic companies and small producers has enabled the domestic Chinese economy to tap into the large U.S. industries and to expand their domestic exports of natural goods. China’s industrial development has also led to a rapid transition from one of the world’s most heavily traded countries on defense and technology to one of the most heavily invested nations in its economy. The U.S.-GMs hope Beijing will take advantage to further strengthen its relations with the U.S. to make U.S. trade stronger. The President will have a clear understanding that the U.S.-China relationship, regardless of whether it suits each nation, relies on the common benefits of strong cooperation, and that China should invest in developing its own trade and investment base more widely.
Posted on March 02, 2016 at 4:10 pm
I’ve said it before: US policymakers should have a clear understanding that the U.S.-China relations are complex and long-standing, and should maintain their strong ties to the Chinese market, which they have long supported. The President has done very well in convincing Beijing to accept some of the problems that China is facing and that the U.S.-GMs view as fundamental. And he has committed to increasing cooperation as part of a broader “balance of powers” of the U.S., rather than just the short period of isolation he might have if he wanted to make the transition from isolationist to free trade, especially in key economic sectors. He has not done as badly in maintaining strong co-operation with the region’s powerful economies as he may wish. However, the U.S.-GMs believe China and Europe are doing very well; China should, for example, increase investment in trade by 1.1 percent per year and make major investments in infrastructure, including water infrastructure. Many Chinese think this is a more constructive approach, but I do not think it would improve U.S. relations with Beijing either. Chinese officials have warned of growing security threats between the South China Sea and the United States. China’s “most senior officials” and “special interests.” This is the case if the United States does not address tensions with Beijing, and is seeking to build an even stronger partnership with China. In fact, a growing U.S. trade deficit with China in the past two years has strained U.S.-China relations, and could lead to a potential slowdown in China’s growth in the future. China’s policy makers should have a clear understanding that the U.S.-China relations are complex and long-standing, and should maintain their strong ties to the Chinese market, which they have long supported. As of 2015 the U.S.-GMs valued $15 billion, including $5 billion in foreign currency, between China and Russia
Posted on March 02, 2016 at 3:59 pm
While U.S. policy makers are beginning to see the need for more engagement at the domestic level, they may not know fully what to expect from China on the path toward economic and security balance of power. China has been a strong, dominant trading partner of the United States—in fact, much more than any other trading partner. The United States has consistently and consistently promoted the importance of bilateral trade. In addition, its economic growth has been buoyed by high domestic demand and free trade. Foreign direct investment by domestic companies and small producers has enabled the domestic Chinese economy to tap into the large U.S. industries and to expand their domestic exports of natural goods. China’s industrial development has also led to a rapid transition from one of the world’s most heavily traded countries on defense and technology to one of the most heavily invested nations in its economy. The U.S.-GMs hope Beijing will take advantage to further strengthen its relations with the U.S. to make U.S. trade stronger. The President will have a clear understanding that the U.S.-China relationship, regardless of whether it suits each nation, relies on the common benefits of strong cooperation, and that China should invest in developing its own trade and investment base more widely.
Posted on March 02, 2016 at 4:10 pm