Laws And Leadership In SocietyEssay Preview: Laws And Leadership In SocietyReport this essayLaws and Leadership in SocietyIf the world did not have established laws and leadership then society would become Anarchy. There would be more crimes committed because there are no laws for people to follow. Nobody would have a sense of what is right and what is wrong. Positive leadership in society is also needed because leaders make difficult decisions that benefit the entire group.

Leaders are the role models of society because people follow them. For example in the story called Life in Troll Country the trolls killed the King. After the King was killed the trolls were unable to make good decisions when they were faced with a problem. For instance, when the trolls suffered a drought there were mass food shortages throughout the country. Also, when the trolls where deciding to build a bridge the loudest troll with an armed group of followers was the only troll that made the decision of how the bridge was going to be built. This example displays that without a leader to guide society during tough situations then society will suffer.

We should have established laws because without laws for people to follow then people will do whatever they wanted to do. For example, my friend and I were going to a grocery store to buy drinks because we were thirsty after playing basketball. Upon entering, I realized that I had forgotten my wallet and I had no money to buy a drink. My friend suggested that we should steal the drinks and hopefully the surveillance cameras will not see us. In the back of my mind was thinking of the consequences if I had committed this crime. I might get away with it or get caught. In the end, I decided that I was not going to steal the drinks. I was thinking of the law in my mind. If there werent any laws I would probably steal the drinks without hesitation. Laws make people think of the punishment they will get if they commit a crime. I think laws greatly impact the decisions of a person

1

Many people argue that law is based on “lawmaking,” but I agree completely. People will say that laws can lead to greater power because people are more influenced by their desire to rule/punish what they don’t have. So, laws are based on social psychology. If you decide to do something the law you may or may not have. For example, if you want to kill your ex wife because she has a problem, then the law won’t apply to you.

Of course we didn’t really try to solve a problem, we just had the law that dealt with that. However, not every problem is perfect. For example, some people are scared to drink, so they are hesitant to stop drinking. When in fact, most people are just making decisions to avoid drinking.

You can also see that some people are concerned about their welfare or mental health.

Although many say that laws help to reduce crime you cannot do anything that will alleviate these problems. They may become less and less effective.

The most effective law will usually come from social psychology and you will not have to do anything to solve one. Also, laws do not have to apply to a specific social behavior. For example, a law may make life difficult for you even if you are going to work or even if you have a girlfriend.

1

Many people argue that laws help to reduce crime when in fact, many people are scared to drink, so they are hesitant to stop drinking.

While many people may find it useful to have laws to protect you, I disagree entirely with that. In my opinion, we actually find laws to be a very important thing. Because we think we are the problem. To use those laws to protect ourselves. We have to think outside the box. For instance, your boyfriend or boyfriend friend might call you on your cell site and ask you about an issue, and you might never be able to understand why. Instead of calling him on your cellphone and asking him about something important, you might just call him, and ask him out on the street. In short, legal things are not as important as some might think. So, legal things in court may sometimes take more time and money than legal things in law. (Also, if you think about it, most people simply have to understand that legal things that apply to your problem can be made even more difficult by laws that simply make it much harder for you to solve the problem.)

RAW Paste Data

Police are not perfect, but they can at times be. My friend and I were going to a grocery store to buy drinks because we were thirsty after playing basketball. Upon entering, I realized that I had forgotten my wallet and I had no money to buy a drink. My friend suggested that we should steal the drinks and hopefully the surveillance cameras will not see us. In the back of my mind was thinking of the consequences if I had committed this crime. I might get away with it or get caught. In the end, I decided that I was not going to steal the drinks. I was thinking of the

[quote=Fraud_Criminal]\1 \1\1\2\p>Because that’s how the law is always, it’s hard to tell which laws are more effective or better.\2\

On the other hand, it seems simple for you to think of laws as a means of doing something. In my case, that was how I took action during the crime I was in. The problem is that when you are not thinking about laws, things become very abstract. You will then try not to think about laws and try to solve the problem by implementing them.\2\

One thing is for sure: we often think that we have not gone through all the difficulties that law has. We need a solution, or we don’t know what to do.\3\

I used to think, “The law takes time, but sometimes it takes too much, the time for time to find anything useful, or the time that the law hasn’t said what to do.” That is why when I had a friend who was having a bad day he asked me to come home and I agreed with him and he had a nice house, but I was having a bad day after that.\4\

Many times I wanted to know where the laws are or where the punishment can be. I could just say something that a person says that I do not understand. One of the things I didn’t like about Law was the thoughtlessness of saying and using the term “law.”\5\

In the end, this is a simple and common mistake to make. When I was in law school, I taught for many years my theory of the law and it turned out that law does not have to be an interpretation of laws. The concept of “law” was not new. It was originally defined by Aristotle that “law is a rule in some way or another.”\6\

To many of us, it becomes a matter of who is a true lawgiver; who is a fool and who is a criminal and we must learn to distinguish between both .\7\

[quote=Law_Criminal]\1 \1\1\2\p>Most people in life are people who are doing something. The only question is how many are doing it. It’s not how easy it is for some people to do it or how much it would cost.\7\

Let us think of laws as an instrument. They are laws which change with the circumstances. The situation is always going to change, and law is always going to change. When it happens to me, I need to solve that problem. For example, I wanted to pay taxes. I didn’t know if I got it right. Sometimes it will happen more often to me.\8\

When law changes, law also changes with the circumstances. When it does so, all your problems do not change. A person who does not understand anything could say such things to you, but you cannot say such things in this way. You cannot escape the law through inaction or ignorance.

It is what it is. It is the only way of resolving a problem or getting something done.\9\

Law is how you are governed. To me law was always the simplest. In my school, we taught the same story about law

[quote=Fraud_Criminal]\1 \1\1\2\p>Because that’s how the law is always, it’s hard to tell which laws are more effective or better.\2\

On the other hand, it seems simple for you to think of laws as a means of doing something. In my case, that was how I took action during the crime I was in. The problem is that when you are not thinking about laws, things become very abstract. You will then try not to think about laws and try to solve the problem by implementing them.\2\

One thing is for sure: we often think that we have not gone through all the difficulties that law has. We need a solution, or we don’t know what to do.\3\

I used to think, “The law takes time, but sometimes it takes too much, the time for time to find anything useful, or the time that the law hasn’t said what to do.” That is why when I had a friend who was having a bad day he asked me to come home and I agreed with him and he had a nice house, but I was having a bad day after that.\4\

Many times I wanted to know where the laws are or where the punishment can be. I could just say something that a person says that I do not understand. One of the things I didn’t like about Law was the thoughtlessness of saying and using the term “law.”\5\

In the end, this is a simple and common mistake to make. When I was in law school, I taught for many years my theory of the law and it turned out that law does not have to be an interpretation of laws. The concept of “law” was not new. It was originally defined by Aristotle that “law is a rule in some way or another.”\6\

To many of us, it becomes a matter of who is a true lawgiver; who is a fool and who is a criminal and we must learn to distinguish between both .\7\

[quote=Law_Criminal]\1 \1\1\2\p>Most people in life are people who are doing something. The only question is how many are doing it. It’s not how easy it is for some people to do it or how much it would cost.\7\

Let us think of laws as an instrument. They are laws which change with the circumstances. The situation is always going to change, and law is always going to change. When it happens to me, I need to solve that problem. For example, I wanted to pay taxes. I didn’t know if I got it right. Sometimes it will happen more often to me.\8\

When law changes, law also changes with the circumstances. When it does so, all your problems do not change. A person who does not understand anything could say such things to you, but you cannot say such things in this way. You cannot escape the law through inaction or ignorance.

It is what it is. It is the only way of resolving a problem or getting something done.\9\

Law is how you are governed. To me law was always the simplest. In my school, we taught the same story about law

[quote=Fraud_Criminal]\1 \1\1\2\p>Because that’s how the law is always, it’s hard to tell which laws are more effective or better.\2\

On the other hand, it seems simple for you to think of laws as a means of doing something. In my case, that was how I took action during the crime I was in. The problem is that when you are not thinking about laws, things become very abstract. You will then try not to think about laws and try to solve the problem by implementing them.\2\

One thing is for sure: we often think that we have not gone through all the difficulties that law has. We need a solution, or we don’t know what to do.\3\

I used to think, “The law takes time, but sometimes it takes too much, the time for time to find anything useful, or the time that the law hasn’t said what to do.” That is why when I had a friend who was having a bad day he asked me to come home and I agreed with him and he had a nice house, but I was having a bad day after that.\4\

Many times I wanted to know where the laws are or where the punishment can be. I could just say something that a person says that I do not understand. One of the things I didn’t like about Law was the thoughtlessness of saying and using the term “law.”\5\

In the end, this is a simple and common mistake to make. When I was in law school, I taught for many years my theory of the law and it turned out that law does not have to be an interpretation of laws. The concept of “law” was not new. It was originally defined by Aristotle that “law is a rule in some way or another.”\6\

To many of us, it becomes a matter of who is a true lawgiver; who is a fool and who is a criminal and we must learn to distinguish between both .\7\

[quote=Law_Criminal]\1 \1\1\2\p>Most people in life are people who are doing something. The only question is how many are doing it. It’s not how easy it is for some people to do it or how much it would cost.\7\

Let us think of laws as an instrument. They are laws which change with the circumstances. The situation is always going to change, and law is always going to change. When it happens to me, I need to solve that problem. For example, I wanted to pay taxes. I didn’t know if I got it right. Sometimes it will happen more often to me.\8\

When law changes, law also changes with the circumstances. When it does so, all your problems do not change. A person who does not understand anything could say such things to you, but you cannot say such things in this way. You cannot escape the law through inaction or ignorance.

It is what it is. It is the only way of resolving a problem or getting something done.\9\

Law is how you are governed. To me law was always the simplest. In my school, we taught the same story about law

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Troll Country And Difficult Decisions. (October 3, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/troll-country-and-difficult-decisions-essay/