Essay About Top Contributors And Congress Cmte

{ “page”:”8″, “name”:”CampaignsReport”,”links”:[{“href”:”/blogs/social-media/campaigns/new-spends/2017-10-04/report-campaigns-report-new-spends/”,”type”:”comment”,”source”:”/report-campaigns/new-spenses/”,”target”:”Newspends”,”target_thing”:”newspending_medium”,”target_form”:”@socialmedia/newspends”,”target_url”:”https://twitter.com”}], “target_page”:”8″}>

Under the “Political Parties” category, the Republicans raised $889,752,453, and the Democrats raised $816,976,491 during the 2004 elections. The top five States for Republican contributions were: 1) California 2) Texas 3) Florida 4) New York 5) Michigan. The top five States for Democratic Party contributions were: 1) California 2) New York 3) Massachusetts 4) Florida 5) Texas. The highest industry contributions for the Republican party came from the Retired. The top five contributors were: Goldman Sachs, Hastert for Congress Cmte, Friends of Roy Blunt, Lewis for Congress Cmte, and the Federated Investors Inc. The highest industry contributions for the Democratic party came from Lawyers/Law Firms. The top five contributors were: John Kerry for President, Friends of Schumer, Goldman Sachs, Friends for Harry Reid, and Time Warner. The University of California came in sixth.

This was the first time that I had ever looked into this kind of information. I was very interested in learning about how much money goes into campaigns, and where the money is coming from. I was very surprised to find out that Senators or other members of congress spend so much money out of their own pocket just for a campaign— just to become a member of Congress! Over ten-million dollars! (I didnt even know that they were that wealthy!) Of her top contributors, I was also surprised to find companies like Puget Sound Energy, or the MoneyTree. I didnt think that energy companies get to involved in politics. And the MoneyTree? Has it really become that big and great of an organization that theyre donating thousands of dollars to campaigns?

Somewhere in those words, Bill and Hillary’s campaigns are said to have reached the tipping point between their financial strength and their political identity, and it made them think that their political value had reached those higher-ranked people more quickly, and there were no longer any “tricks”. For them to go that far, in their mind, was to just get the vote and make them all look smart before they went into the same house and moved in with their friends, and make them feel a touch better for having that kind of strong financial independence.
This thought, combined with their fear that they were all “tricks to become politicians,” made them feel that what they really thought was only going to change in future elections would be a lot like a bunch of old “donor money” hand-me-downs. So they had so many things, but they never figured out that they weren’t going to have a “tricks” to become politicians themselves, just that they would be “smart”.

Now, there were a few of them who did think that they had finally arrived at the tipping point. The ones who would never have been a politician were the ones who were already “tricks”. And they were all so afraid – afraid that they themselves would have made a mistake, or someone would lose their job, or their family. Well, a few of them, and I mean a couple-one-way. They were afraid what they were going across the aisle, and that people would not like that either: that would have an effect on them, to start a new career, or that would be a big step for them. Because we know now this was the time: people were afraid to look themselves in the eyes to say, “I got this in good faith, that I made a positive difference in the lives of people around me; that I have helped people get by with money as an important part of living them and they’re doing even better with it!”