Essay About Supreme Court Of The United States And Important Evidence

In the Supreme Court of the United States – Creative Writing – Bryan Huerta
Search
Essays
Sign up
Sign in
Contact us
Tweet
Index
/History Other
In the Supreme Court of the United States
In The Supreme Court of the United States
Dexter (Petitioner) v.
Michigan State Prosecutor (Respondent )
On Writ of Certiorari
To the Supreme Court of the United States
BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF THE
Criminal Bar Association
In Support of Dexter [petitioner]
The rights of Dwight Dexter were not adequately upheld in the criminal justice system. Important evidence was suppressed by the prosecution, including the fact that one of the witnesses was a paid informant of the state, and that another witness had made up Dexters confession. Dexter was not initially provided adequate counsel, as his attorney had not even seen some of the evidence or prepared the witnesses. The jury also was impartial with its speed and its jurors being all white. Ultimately Sheriff Dodd tampered with the investigation and he searched and stripped Dexter from his belongings unlawfully. Because of these important factors it is abundantly clear that Dexters rights have not been properly upheld violating his 4th, 5th, and 6th amendment.

First off important evidence about the case was made up by the prosecution. One of the witnesses, Randolph Stone, has admitted that he lied at Dexters trial. Stone had originally claimed that Dexter had shown up at his house with a vehicle and a weapon and had confessed to the crime, while in fact Dexter had shown up unarmed, on foot, and did not confess. Another witness Morgan Livingston later admitted to being a paid informant of the state, which he had explicitly denied at the trial. Livingston admitted that he had lured Dexter to Detroit in an attempt to frame him. Also both of them said on trial that they hadn’t been trained by the prosecution but in reality they had. In the Supreme Court Case Brady v. Maryland, the court ruled that the use of certain illegal evidence violates due process. In this case it is clear that we’re perjury and some evidence was obtained illegally. Therefore, it can be concluded that Dexters right to due process has not been upheld which violates his 5th amendment.

Also it is unlikely that the defense provided Dexter with adequate counsel at the trial. Dexters attorney had not seen some of the important evidence, such as photographs of the crime scene and the ballistics report. Later, the attorney failed to prepare Dexters witnesses for the trial. In the case Strickland v. Washington, established

defendant’s conviction that his rights had been violated when his lawyer did not provide enough evidence to avoid the death sentence. The standard for
Continue for 2 more pages »
Read full document
Download as (for upgraded members)
Citation Generator
MLA 7
CHICAGO
(2017, 12). In the Supreme Court of the United States. EssaysForStudent.com. Retrieved 12, 2017, from
“In the Supreme Court of the United States” EssaysForStudent.com. 12 2017. 2017. 12 2017 < "In the Supreme Court of the United States." EssaysForStudent.com. EssaysForStudent.com, 12 2017. Web. 12 2017. < "In the Supreme Court of the United States." EssaysForStudent.com. 12, 2017. Accessed 12, 2017. Essay Preview By: Bryan Huerta Submitted: December 14, 2017 Essay Length: 730 Words / 3 Pages Paper type: Creative Writing Views: 1,019 Report this essay Tweet Related Essays The United States Is to Blame for the Cold War The US is to blame for the Cold War From when World War II ended in 1945 all the way up to the collapse of 1,101 Words  |  5 Pages Supreme Court Case of Dennis V. United States, 1951 For nearly five years, the United States and Great Britain allied with the Soviet Union to defeat the Axis Powers, during World War II. During 551 Words  |  3 Pages Begay Vs. United States Court Case Research Paper Begay v. United States On January 24, 2005, Larry Begay, a convicted felon, pled guilty in the New Mexico District Court to illegally possessing a 3,600 Words  |  15 Pages Should the Supreme Court Be Required to Set Specific Competency Standards for States to Justly Impose the Death Sentence? of 4 Michelle Hayden Student ID #840460529 POLS&200 Final Paper December 2, 2018 ISSUE Should the Supreme Court be required to set specific competency standards 1,001 Words  |  5 Pages Similar Topics Funding United States Space Program Migration United States Get Access to 89,000+ Essays and Term Papers Join 209,000+ Other Students High Quality Essays and Documents Sign up © 2008–2020 EssaysForStudent.comFree Essays, Book Reports, Term Papers and Research Papers Essays Sign up Sign in Contact us Site Map Privacy Policy Terms of Service Facebook Twitter