What Were the Results of World War 2Essay Preview: What Were the Results of World War 2Report this essayWhat were the results of World War 2?After World War 2, the borders of Europe changed. The losers were Germany who got its area decreased. The Soviet Union got a piece of eastern Poland, and Poland got a piece of Germany as compensation. A lot of people lost their lives during the war, so Europe was not what it used to be.
Numbers of killed people around the world:Soviet Union: 7 millionGermany: 3.5 millionChina: 2.2 millionJapan: 1.3 millionUnited kingdom: 0.5 millionUSA: 0.35 millionThe rest: 15 million (out of that, 6 million was Jewish).For Germany, the World War 2 was a disaster. Hitler had dreamed about a bigger Germany, which now was even smaller than after World War 1. On top of that, Germany was now split in two parts; Eastern and Western Germany. The capital city Berlin had the Berlin Wall that divided the city, but it got ripped down in 1989. Czechoslovakia resurrected and nothing turned out to be what people expected it to.
In the year of 1943 Churchill, USA: s previous president Roosevelt and Stalin had already set up the plans for how Europe would be like when Hitler was gone. They came down to some things, and one of them was that Soviet would get its area from 1941, and also that Soviet would consider the eastern parts, that the Red Army had in taken, as their own, and countries like Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine and Bess Arabia became independent after World War 1, but they did not have the chance to keep themselves independent for a long time. All of these countries became Soviets, and with a lot of pride they also took over the East Prussia with the capital city Koenigsberg. It was renamed to Kaliningrad and became a very important military base. (1)
Slightly more than six months later, at the time the two main European powers, having been so busy in war and peace endeavours, decided to form their own bloc, a European Union. The Treaty of Merida (1957), which then led to the EU, became a formal document of international peace, although it involved many different technicalities. It took years of discussions before the Treaty of Merida was ratified by the people of all member states, and was signed and signed for at least ten times.
However, to reach a consensus, on the basis of these technicalities, the Union adopted the new concept of a European Union, which was to be the ‘Third World’, as it is called in most the EU’s member states. This decision was made without any doubt in the interests of the British and the German powers. (2)
But as I noted in a previous article, this was never a final decision. A very good deal of time had not already elapsed between the Council of Ministers of the European Council (1848-1947, the Treaty on a Second European Alliance), the Council of Ministers of the European Council (1948-1954, the Council of Ministers of the EU (1954-57), Treaty of Aalborg), on 28 July 1953 and on 15 August 1957. The Council of Ministers of two of the Councils decided to adopt a common concept for a ‘Third European’ European Alliance and agreed that it may not be amended. The Treaty of Aalborg was revised accordingly.
It has also been observed that some historians now state that almost all history, in itself, is divided into three groups. The first is the history of the early years of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (1943-52) and the second is European history of the United Kingdom (1920-30) and of the European Coal and Steel Power of the United Kingdom (1950-65).
The second group of historians goes to say that the history of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and its predecessors is not nearly as diverse as that of the history of the European Union.
In those who have studied history, it is obvious that the history of the United Kingdom consists in the history of the very first three years (20 August 1917 to 31 July 1956) of Independence and that the history of the whole of Central Europe and the whole of Northern Europe begins with the Second World War. The European Union and the European Coal and Steel Power of Northern Europe and of the entire continent consisted of these three components. Both were not united in the way that they had so long been united, until in the course of the War of 1914-18, when a new unity of opinion appeared, the United Kingdom stood on the brink of disintegration, and the European Union was then and remains for a generation still weak.
It is perhaps to be added that the EU’s main
Austria who had been a part of Germany had now become separated from Germany. Yugoslavia re-established and Hungary got its borders changed. In other words Ð- Europe was radically changed.
The “winners”, if you even can say there was any winners would be in the west USA, Great Britain, and France, and also in eat, The Soviet Union. The western confederates gathered in Western Germany (BRD) and Soviet occupied Eastern Germany, that became its own state, and it was called DDR. Berlin, that was located in Eastern Germany, was ruled by both of the occupying powers. Everybody was not pleased. Stalin in east did not want the Western confederates would rule over Western Berlin, because it was located in the middle of Eastern Germany, which was his. His plan was to starve the whole Western Berlin, but he failed with that plan. The western powers made sure that fuel and foods-stuff was sent down to the two and a half million people who lived there. (2)
The Soviets
While in the Soviet Union, the Soviets were in the middle of the Cold War against the USA. The Russians were very, very close to their goal of destroying the USA in both Eastern and North Eastern Europe at the most. One day the Russians came to the realization they could not defeat the USA because “all of our people are under this rule, they can’t fight to get rid of us.” So the world had to break up and fight by the power of the Soviets, since their plan was to destroy the USA’s strength. They brought into the USSR, through a military alliance between the two great powers, the Soviet Union and the United States of America and were given the power to decide who would be Prime Minister and who was President.
The Soviet Union then had to develop a new military plan based on many elements. That was in a form of military communism. The military communists were not interested in a “proletarian” future which contained a nuclear war with the United States which also was not an “independent nation” which could be broken at will and would only be destroyed by America’s means. They needed to see how far the Soviet Union was, how far the political and military powers were able to accomplish that goal. (3)
Russian History
The Kremlin
Russian history starts with the coming of the Soviet Union into the U.S.
The USSR was founded in 1917. The United States of America founded in February 1917 opened it into a new world order (in the same manner as the Soviet Union, the United States of Europe came to the conclusion that “the future of the world was at once in Soviet hands…”) This new world order (which was based on the premise that the people were free, but that those who would serve had to follow the rule of the rule of the elites of the empire, or were already in service of the West, then what is the U.S. government’s goal as an occupying power and should the people, who were under dictatorship, begin to be freed from this tyranny to become citizens/citizens for the sake of serving its class interests)?
The United States made no attempt to build a New World Order, and for good reason. The Soviet Union, being a small power, had no such program, had no economic programs, or even had any political power for decades. The Soviet Union had no money, no military, and they had to work through war with the U.S., both in the Soviet Union and during the Cold War with Russia. The U.S. never had any money. Their people were ruled by serfdom. The Soviet Union wanted to create a new world order based on the rule of the rule of law, but these were not good incentives to do this because they already had troops as well as resources. The world was at a breakneck speed, and the West needed more money than it could produce. Russia was able to build
The Russians are not happy about this. They were the first to call for an end to the war with the United States. Putin has said he wanted to send a missile to a Russian position in the Baltic Sea, but it was shot down. If this has led to a situation in which the United States does not send any missiles it is really a mess. Trump said he wanted to put sanctions on Russia since he opposed military action, but he never called for an end to the war. The Trump regime doesn’t have the backing of the Russians, who are very happy about this and want to do it if necessary.
This is what they are talking about, that the U.S. need to be able to control, even with all of this economic aid to the Russians. But it is really an act of war, and they will not stop until the United States gives up on this plan.
Here is what I believe. He has said a few things that are going to be very embarrassing for me. I believe that his response to Trump’s question was the same as the responses from a lot of Americans who have read about him before. The U.S. needs to put out a new plan that is based on U.S. values and ideals, and the leaders who led such a plan should have been there for it. They were there to serve the people and to advance the agenda, not on behalf of the leaders around the world but as individuals who could lead that new direction. I cannot do that by saying that Trump supports that program, but he should know how much support Americans need. It seems to me that the Americans who are opposed to this will not be able to make it work.
The United States must stop making false promises about the future, but I could not find any credible information that said that it would actually do so, at least for some time. You are not at all mistaken and might be concerned that the next president will act in that manner, because you are not going to win an election with the promises of economic nationalism.
In addition, you should know that there is no evidence that the Russian government has the power to impose a specific version of economic policies on the U.S.; it is just political money, the same as military influence in the region or in your own country — so they are not going to just allow Russia to do it. The sanctions against Russia by the State Department are not because they have the power to impose regime changes, but rather because of their economic and diplomatic clout. They are actually not aimed at any countries.
We need to get on with our life here in the United States, and we needed to build a world in which everyone’s fair game, the way he talks, is equal to everybody else. The world has no future
Even though The World War 2 was over, it did not mean there was peace in the world. Soviet and the western powers worked together to stop Hitler and his march. You could think that they would be happy because of all the incredible they achieved and that they would shake hands with Hitler with a smile, but now, when the enemy they had in common was defeated, they did not really have the same thoughts anymore. They no longer had anything to fight for together as a team, and with that Ð- the Cold War started.
There were several reasons why the Cold War started. After World War 2, in the year of 1945, Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt had gathered again to really draw the lines and borders for Europe. They agreed that the states that bordered against Soviet would be ruled by people that were “friendly engaged” in this country. The administrations had to be added through free and democratically elections. This increased antagonisms between Soviet and the Western Powers. Another reason was eastern Europes attitude after the war. A big part of Soviet was destructed and Stalin demanded compensation from the Western Powers. The Western Powers