The Fall of the Roman EmpireEssay title: The Fall of the Roman EmpireDiscuss the factors involved in the fall of the Roman empire. Be sure to mention militaristic, economic, political and societal reasons, as well as any others you deem necessary.
The Roman Empire was an influential reign of time, land, and society. With people who demonstrated such qualities as gravitas and dignity, it was quite an empire to defeat. Because of its vastness, in size and in influence, its decline cannot be attributed to one pinpointed cause. Instead, the fall of Rome is reasoned to have occurred because of militaristic, economic, political and societal problems: some controllable, and some consequential. Specifically, disease, political and economic turmoil, and social and societal change, all attributed to the downward spiral of the Roman Empire.
The first factor in the fall of Rome was disease. Although not necessarily preventable, it was definitely consequential. Because of overcrowding in cites and under managed areas, disease sprouted more easily and spread more quickly. Because of economic turmoil, many Romans were poor, and those who were not poor spent money on more luxurious and frivolous things instead of necessities. Consequently, many urban areas were poor and unkempt and were a catalyst for the spread of disease. Lead poisoning was a big problem to the Romans and its detrimental effects were even more greatly increased because of the quickly spreading diseases.
The economic turmoil that eventually brought down the quality of Roman living was not only caused by poor or frivolous spenders, but also because of a floundering government. For a while, sequential rulers, all of whom were successful in their reign, ruled Rome. At the end of each rulers reign, he would choose an appropriate successor. Marcus Aurelius was the last good choice, and the first to make a bad choice. He chose his son Commodes. Commodes ended the string of great rulers with a failing term. After Commodes, two rulers tried to salvage Rome from its slide down the slippery slope of failure: Diocletian and Constantine. Diocletian tried to improve the economy by locking people into jobs and locking prices. Although it seems like it might work in theory to stop decline. What it ended up doing was preventing any improvement. Because everything was locked, there was no way to improve,
“In some parts of the world, a great change has occurred: the rise of the Roman Empire.”
In this case, the Roman Empire was already in decline because many people had died in the previous century.”
“A thousand years ago, Roman culture and its people were very different.”
People in many parts of the world were very different. Thousands of years ago, Roman culture and the people in many parts of the world lived in great harmony.
And those thousand years ago, Roman culture and the people in most parts of the world lived in great harmony. > And those thousand years ago, Roman culture and the people in most parts of the world lived in great harmony,
People in many parts of the world were very different. They lived in a world where every man and woman carried a sword, and they would always fight the enemies whose strength and wealth depended on how they were able to defend themselves. Many Roman families carried children, and they wanted to be happy, and there was no such thing as a child who could not lead family life and succeed at war.
And those thousand years ago, Roman culture and the people in most parts of the world were very different. They lived in a world where every man and woman carried a sword, and they would always fight the enemies whose strength and wealth depended on how they were able to defend themselves. Many Roman families carried children, and they wanted to be happy, and there was no such thing as a child who could not lead family life and succeed at war. And every Roman family carried children, and they wanted to be happy, and they wanted to be happy,
People in many parts of the world were very different. they lived in a world where every man and woman carried a sword, and they would always fight the enemies whose strength and wealth depended on how they were able to defend themselves. Many Roman families carried children, and they wanted to be happy, and there was no such thing as a child who could not lead family life and succeed at war.
People in many parts of the world were very different. They lived in a world where every man and woman carried a sword, and they would always fight the enemies whose strength and wealth depended on how they were able to defend themselves.<
They were very different from the Roman world where no government or a monarchy ruled them.
That is why, without