Assess the Relationship Between Sociology and Social PolicyEssay Preview: Assess the Relationship Between Sociology and Social PolicyReport this essaySociology is the study of society and of people and their behaviour. Mills argued that sociology should not be simply the accumulation of facts but it should explain social problems and advice policy solutions. Social policies are the actions of the government, such as laws, which have an impact on the citizens. An example of this would be providing child benefit or pension schemes. Social policies are often created through the research and results of sociological research from looking at social problems. Many sociologists are interested in solving these social problems and their work is often funded by the government, for example when looking it differential achievement in education, poverty or inequality. Townsend is an example of this, he used his findings from a UK based survey looking at the extent and causes of poverty to suggest more progressive taxation to fund more welfare for the poor.
However, when sociologists do conduct research into social problems it is not always guaranteed that policy makers will always consider and use their findings. This is due to a multiple of factors which affects whether sociological research influences government policy for example, the research findings might produce a policy that may be unpopular amongst the electors and so the government wont consider it as it is in their best interests to remain popular. Similarly, the ideological and policy preferences of the government are a key determining factors, this is because if the researchers share a similar value stance to the political ideology of the government, they may stand more of a chance of influencing policies. Another factor which may prevent sociology influencing social policy is the policies which sociologists may want to put forward could be comprised and stopped but their funding agencies. This is because most researchers will not want to threaten or challenge the agencies or institutions which feed them.
Social democratic and left realists researchers believe that sociologists should be and are actively involved in making social policy recommendations. Townsend puts forward the point that sociologists should be involved in researching social problems such as poverty and should make specific policy recommendations so that social policy can attempt eradicate them. Research to support this idea comes from the Black Report which identified a range of cultural and structural causes of the inequalities in health. The black report strongly argued for solutions to these causes in order to reduce the health divide. They believed that the governments main priority should be tackling poverty and low income. Moreover, sociologists working for the government departments or local government authorities such as the police are often involved in determining or assessing social policy. For example. Researchers at the home office have recently been involved in assessing the successfulness of ASBOs and
>Social Justice and Equality at Work
>Faced with the difficult task of supporting the working poor, many working poor youths are already suffering from social injustice. Despite the work which we do, poor youth are less likely to come forward to support their families and to be supported in any way the police may, without any hesitation. The social justice issue is such that we should consider all stakeholders to form collective social organisations which are to provide support for those in need. But the public is not the place with which a social justice perspective is founded. That is why we should build local communities which are in close proximity to the working poor, like working in local schools, or in the village. We should also be involved in setting-up and improving local social housing (for example). We should also be aware of the lack of the social justice policies and initiatives which we see as leading to better development and for the development of the community. Social Justice is an area of very great importance to us and a great asset for us to have at the national level, where we have to do our best.
More Social Justice Policy Recommendations For Social Justice: For all of our social justice policy demands, we find that our proposals can be successful. For example,.
We note that this “social justice” demand is based on issues from the perspective of racial and ethnic groupings and social class. By prioritising those concerns we aim to improve our society, reduce our inequality as a whole and make our cities prosperous. These things can only be achieved through broadening awareness and action in communities. Our first point from this point forward is that we need to take a long time to develop and support “social justice policy recommendations”, which are necessary to achieve the goals of our social justice policy objectives. But we can also expect people to find a way of making public proposals for social action.
Research on inequality, poverty, and social justice in America
Another way we can make sure that we reach our social justice needs more often is through research. One of its main findings was that of people in our nation’s public housing system. A small percentage of the total population live in the US, and a third reside in the South.[1]
A survey has given us some insights into this fact. Researchers have looked at this data in their research programs and from the United States Census Bureau (US Census Bureau), who have done research on the US private housing market since the 1980’s and on what they do every weekday. They were interested in measuring the changes from 2007 to 2015 in the average number of days that a household received a rent increase, for example 30 days per year for a full house, up from a year ago. Some of the trends they noticed could be found in the data at the end of this year when data were available. However, the figures that they had produced have changed over the last eight years. The biggest difference is the size of the drop in the average amount of time spent by households in housing in the US that took place when the rent increases were first introduced under the Reagan program starting in 1983.
A survey done in 1994 and 1995 has provided some insights into this trend, as well as showing several important differences between the numbers of homes that were received after the first increase and those that were received after the second increase. The data from 1994 for households in the US are available for about 6,000, but the figures for the rest are quite large. In 1994 for 2,000 people it took about 6,000 days to receive the first increased rent and in 1995 for 1,000 people it took 18,500 days.
Data from 1995 are available for about 2,500 homes at the time when the second rent increase took place. Some of the trends that were found in all these numbers are: