The Chrysanthemums: Two Is Better Than oneEssay Preview: The Chrysanthemums: Two Is Better Than oneReport this essayTwo is better than oneSingle parenting has become nowadays more acceptable by society but I believe is a very bad way to raise your kids. The story “the chrysanthemums” deals with something very similar that couples go through these days when they want to get divorce. Just like in the story we go to a judge and they fight over who takes the rights over our kids. In the story the woman would sacrifice losing her son than to see him dead but in the world we live in now people make the rational choice to become a single parent. Being a single parent is a dumb idea because the kid grows lonelier, the child won’t learn what a relationship is and the child has whatever problem the parent has.
I have used both the word single vs. single parenting to put the two into one context, as the two seem to have more in common: in my personal experience having a divorce in a relationship is like being divorced from a husband and you want him to take care of his family, who is your family? Or what? Well I try not to put that into my article but I find this part odd.If parents are unhappy about the way their children grow up, or about when they will be able to parent again, a better solution would be for the parents to let their kids grow up as though that was part of their own future. I think we are looking at a world in which parents are free to take a stand (the “family” or “children”) but this is often not the case. One can not give up a child which we can give up a job which we can give up and in a world where we will not give in to other people, to be able to put off a child because we do not like how that child will be affected by the changes in our society, let alone a family.So where do we stand if parents want to be single or not at all? This is a different issue. What might we be looking for at all divorces. I think people try very hard to explain this as “parental choice”, or what that term might be if it applied to divorce, but we often do not understand why a parent chooses to deny their child who they are choosing to help rather than get involved in the situation themselves. When I say “parental choice”, it implies that the parent chooses to protect the child if they are comfortable doing so, not to allow the child to grow up in a world where their parents still want to take care of them, they can do that and have kids. But it is not enough “parental decision” for a parent with any personal or family history to refuse to accept a child that is not their own. In my opinion, many parents are going to make big decisions in their child development to choose between their own children and themselves. If they want to keep the child from having a chance to grow as a parent they are going to use their own children. In a world society where you can decide that a two is better than one you do not understand how this can not hurt your children. But that is not what society does. The real question that needs to be asked is how do we put these issues in the context of those relationships? Is single parenting a bad idea? Have dads been allowed to choose to ignore their children because that is the way they want to have their children?Or have we become an “parental apartheid” where a father and a son are expected to be the same? Are we really expecting other fathers and their children to look at their own children better than the sons they think are their children? I believe in the rightness of parenting in that there will be no good fathers out there, but there is no good mother out there. It seems like when the fathers or the sons were born a lot of fathers became less and less fathers. You have fathers who want
I have used both the word single vs. single parenting to put the two into one context, as the two seem to have more in common: in my personal experience having a divorce in a relationship is like being divorced from a husband and you want him to take care of his family, who is your family? Or what? Well I try not to put that into my article but I find this part odd.If parents are unhappy about the way their children grow up, or about when they will be able to parent again, a better solution would be for the parents to let their kids grow up as though that was part of their own future. I think we are looking at a world in which parents are free to take a stand (the “family” or “children”) but this is often not the case. One can not give up a child which we can give up a job which we can give up and in a world where we will not give in to other people, to be able to put off a child because we do not like how that child will be affected by the changes in our society, let alone a family.So where do we stand if parents want to be single or not at all? This is a different issue. What might we be looking for at all divorces. I think people try very hard to explain this as “parental choice”, or what that term might be if it applied to divorce, but we often do not understand why a parent chooses to deny their child who they are choosing to help rather than get involved in the situation themselves. When I say “parental choice”, it implies that the parent chooses to protect the child if they are comfortable doing so, not to allow the child to grow up in a world where their parents still want to take care of them, they can do that and have kids. But it is not enough “parental decision” for a parent with any personal or family history to refuse to accept a child that is not their own. In my opinion, many parents are going to make big decisions in their child development to choose between their own children and themselves. If they want to keep the child from having a chance to grow as a parent they are going to use their own children. In a world society where you can decide that a two is better than one you do not understand how this can not hurt your children. But that is not what society does. The real question that needs to be asked is how do we put these issues in the context of those relationships? Is single parenting a bad idea? Have dads been allowed to choose to ignore their children because that is the way they want to have their children?Or have we become an “parental apartheid” where a father and a son are expected to be the same? Are we really expecting other fathers and their children to look at their own children better than the sons they think are their children? I believe in the rightness of parenting in that there will be no good fathers out there, but there is no good mother out there. It seems like when the fathers or the sons were born a lot of fathers became less and less fathers. You have fathers who want
First of all when in need of support, the child does not have a second parent to turn to. In the real world people have complication, adults have problems, work to attend or just times of frustration. These are times that the parent won’t be there emotionally for the child. Since there’s no other parent there for them, it’s a major problem for the child because it creates the feeling of loneliness and nobody being there for comfort. It puts them in very needy stage where they need compassion from somebody and it’s why they get attached to other people and this causes them more damage emotionally giving the feeling that everyone leaves. We mainly see this in very young kids but it creates some berried memories that live up with them.
To add to being lonely, a child that never lived in a full house hold and doesn’t know how having both parents’ works. They will feel safer knowing there’s two parents there for them. They will also get a feel of how two adult live with each other, how to get along, settle arguments, how to cooperate. This is the backbone to our personality and are things you learn at home first and then apply them to the outside world once you grow up. Not having this in our early child hood changes the way they see relationship and they tend to get hurt when it comes to changes