Social Status in Shakespeare’s PlaysSocial Status in Shakespeare’s PlaysIn Shakespeares time, the English lived with a strong sense of social class — of belonging to a particular group because of occupation, wealth, and ancestry. Elizabethan Society had a very strict social code at the time that Shakespeare was writing his plays. Social class could determine all sorts of things, from what a person could wear to where he could live to what jobs his children could get. Some families moved from one class to another, but most people were born into a particular class and stayed there. There was a chance of being granted a title by the crown. This was uncommon at the time and a relatively new thing for Europe where ancestry always defined nobility.
Shakespeare’s plays show the different social statuses throughout England because of his audience. He had a variety of social classes that would attend his plays and go to the theater. Most of his plays have a way of identifying with whoever would be in the audience watching. Each different social class has a chance to relate to one of the characters in his plays. In Alls Well That Ends Well, it is the working class that would be able to relate to Helen’s problem. She is the product of a working class family, and therefore thought to be below the nobility. She wasn’t born from a great titled family that has had its name for centuries therefore she is not equal to Bertram.
The play, As You Like It, deals with the Elizabethan social status among the nobility. This play has a lot to do with the act of primogeniture. This play shows that even if people were born of the nobility there was still the chance that they weren’t as good as the rest of the nobility. The second born sons and daughters of the nobility weren’t as important as the first born sons. It was the first born sons that inherited the titles, or they would have to be given to the husband of the daughter. The general audience was that of gentler born younger sons, adults as well as the youths that were still apprentices or students in school. This play opens up with a fight between siblings because of social hierarchy causing them to be put at odds. Primogeniture was not a binding law but rather a flexible social custom in which the propertied sough to perpetuate themselves by preserving their estates intact through successive generations. His play shows that even if they are born within the nobility they are still beneath those that come before them.
Orlando is alienated from the life of being a landed gentleman. This then intensifies the conflicts between siblings, older and younger brother. This also shows the major division in society between the landed and the unlanded, also known as the gentry and the commoners. I also believe that primogeniture complicates not only sibling rivalry, but the relationships between father and sons. The eldest son is impatient to get his rightful inheritance, while the younger sons are resentful that they are receiving nothing from their fathers. Shakespeare’s plays are loaded with subjects, sons and younger brothers who are undecided as to how they should feel about their role in life. They are bound to the people that are better than them on a socio-economic level, but resent the fact. This play gave people a chance to see someone that had sunk in social class get a chance to rise up, which never really happened during this time. Shakespeare used this ploy to really captivate his audience’s attention, while also I believe making fun of society as it was.
The working class in, Alls Well That Ends Well, and the second born son of, As You Like It, isn’t very different. The second born sons are sent off to schools to become apprentices, clergymen, or merchants in the working class. The second born sons aren’t viewed with the same amount of disdain because they are still of noble birth, but they are left to do the same jobs as the people born into the working class. It is the plight of both of these characters, Helen and Orlando, which calls to the audience. The members of the audience can relate in some way to what both of these characters are going through.
Shakespeare’s plays explore the difficulty or impossibility of establishing or authenticating a self in a rigorously hierarchical and patriarchal society. The fact that the people were born into what social class they had to live in leaves them from exploring themselves and potential. They are only allowed to aspire so high, and that defeats the purpose of find oneself because they are told what they are going to be. Shakespeare questions the rigidity of social class in the play, Alls Well That Ends Well, because he portrays Helen as being equal to Bertram because of deed and not birth. The King sees nothing wrong with Helen picking someone to marry that is high above her in social standing. He’s even willing to grant her a title to make her equal to Bertram. The King says it is just Helen’s status that Bertram disdains,
The Queen of England may have made it through the pre-reformation years and the period of her reign, but her legacy rests on the simple fact that even in England, a girl’s education is viewed as a privilege. In many respects, this is not something to be ashamed of. The history of England, along with similar themes of discrimination, corruption, class conflict, sex discrimination, misogyny, rape abuse, homophobia and all the other issues brought about in the history of the country, is a reflection of the time of Britain’s past that is never more fully understood or taught by history.
An Important Role of the Women
If the male view of women in the English public sphere is to be believed, they, too, have more in common with the women than with the men. Of course, there are the women who have had much less to say about those issues and who who are in an uncertain political situation. Yet, they have been a part of the story of life, of politics and of life. Most of us have a role to play in the role of the feminist voice, but that role never takes into account one way or the other. The women who have done so are, in fact, being listened to, because you could never accuse a man of having taken charge or that he does not think he has an equal shot to win a parliamentary seat. There is nothing more frustrating, more frustrating than the fact that women in every realm are constantly having to answer for a perceived lack of feminism, for women’s lives being devalued or for men being denied access to jobs or pensions that have made women more valued.
As a feminist I don’t think that we are all women. The fact is that we do all exist in all possible scenarios, some of which are more or less true — and some of which are less true. But, as we have seen before, there is a way of confronting this injustice, that is, I want to put it this way, no matter which side you’re on.
The Feminist Media Is Doing A Great Job
The media has done a really good job with their history and they have not just provided more to the public through public media. The fact of the matter is, we live in a time and a place where every media outlet offers a certain level of nuance and complexity. And the fact that they offer so many is in no small part due to the fact that they are so constantly changing, and it has become increasingly clear that women have to change their view that sexism and misogyny are simply as rampant as they once were.
There are so many women who are changing their view in the public sphere in response to social and economic change, even as they continue to be left and pushed in the shadows of politics or the political class. And this is in spite of a variety of factors, but its important to highlight the fact that every media outlet is different and different. In this article I will not use any of them as a guide for how to engage or listen to feminism. I will simply highlight the main points as well as the media outlets that have been putting them into action, and the responses they have generated. You can read about each one’s contributions.
So