Discuss the Importance of Female Characters in the Crucible and Snow Falling on Cedars. Compare the Ways They Are Presented.Discuss the Importance of Female Characters in the Crucible and Snow Falling on Cedars. Compare the Ways They Are Presented.Assignment1: Discuss the importance of female characters in ‘Snow Falling on Cedars,’ and ‘The Crucible.’ Compare the ways in which they are presented.
In both, the novel, ‘Snow Falling On Cedars,’ and the play of ‘The Crucible,’ the strength of the female characters is detailed by their portrayals throughout the text, highlighting their importance to the narrative of their respective literature.
When we are first introduced to Abigail, we learn that she has been raised by her uncle, Parris, “a widower with no interest with children, or talent with them,” and this coupled with Salem’s Puritan society leads to her feeling repressed by her environment, and seeking to change her position and status in Salem. Her affair with John Proctor leads to conflict between Salem’s expectations of her, and her cynicism towards their hypocrisy and the “lying lessons” of their society.
Hatsue is also torn between two sets of values during her youth and, like Abigail, this struggle is never fully reconciled. Hatsue feels repressed and confused because she is torn between the Japanese upbringing she has had, including her lessons with Mrs. Shigemura, and the attraction she feels toward the American culture; “her craving for existence and entertainment, for clothes, make-up, dances, movies.” The reader learns this through the embedded narrative in Chapter 7, which provides the audience’s first insight into the background detail of Hatsue’s character, and therefore shows that her conflicting ideals will be important throughout the development of the narrative, and also to our understanding of Hatsue. She is therefore important in this respect, as it is through the readers’ early introduction to this aspect of her character that the theme of conflicting values and cultures becomes apparent; this is suggestive to the reader of events and themes that may transpire later in the narrative, therefore maintaining their interest.
There are similarities between the communities of San Piedro and Salem, but their effects on the behaviour of the female characters differ significantly. For example, Salem is described in Arthur Miller’s stage directions as a place where the “predilection for minding other people’s business was time-honoured…and it undoubtedly created many of the suspicions which were to feed the coming madness.” It was also fiercely Puritan, and this aspect is expressed by the author as “a theocracy, a combine of state and religious power whose function was to keep the community together, and to prevent any kind of disunity that might open it to destruction by material or ideological enemies.” As part of this strict religious government, it is likely that many of Salem’s inhabitants felt repressed by its harsh restrictions and the way simple activities, such as dancing and reading, were regarded with suspicion. Abigail’s reaction against the social context is indicative of this oppression; women were particularly marginalised in the patriarchal Puritan society, and were judged openly as inferior to men, and not permitted to speak in church. This is expressed further by the way Abigail laughs in church: an occurrence which is symbolic of her disrespect and revulsion towards Salem’s hypocritical society, is viewed with suspicion and moral righteousness. This emphasises the restraints of the historical and social context, and so the audience can understand Abigail’s discontent.
During the trials, Abigail acts as if in direct communication with God, in an apparently evangelistic way, and this immediately gains attention and respect from the religion-dominated justice system. This empowers her, and elevates her previously low status within Salem, to the extent that her word is enough to convict any of its inhabitants. Where society once repressed her, her actions gain her a crucial role within it, and she exploits this as much as possible.
Correspondingly, the community of San Piedro represses Hatsue, and this influences her behaviour within it. For example, the society is divided by racism, and this is shown first in the way the derogatory term “Jap,” is utilised by the fishermen, and also by the coroner, Horace Whaley. This implies prejudice, tension and hostility on the part of the white American islanders towards the Japanese community, and through characters’ testimonies and embedded narratives, or ‘flashbacks,’ Guterson develops this theme in detail throughout the novel. The setting of the trial is also significant to this, as it occurs over the anniversary of Pearl Harbour, and these historical implications heighten tension within the racially mixed community. The readers learns that people of Japanese descent are expected to sit at the back of the courtroom. Just as Abigail is seen as inferior because she is an orphaned, unmarried
, the majority are more likely to see the Japanese in the public arena, and to view what’s happening in relation to them as a threat. This, in turn, creates the fear that their children will also face, a psychological or behavioral aspect. The plot line is set in a world full of racial discrimination and racial identity confusion, and it shows a strong sense of fear.
As the trial progresses this fear begins to build, and it gradually starts to expand as the cases continue to unfold, culminating in the trials of ‒Ryoichi,” who is accused of raping a female employee who was a second-class citizen of San Francisco. The trial ends on day 17 and the community is divided by racial conflict.
The first case is a tragedy, as the jury is drawn from the two Koreas together, who also have common interests.
Facts surrounding the book’s depiction of white nationalism
“Guterson’s novel reflects social, historical, cultural and political values”. However, with the social aspect present, we must not expect a certain degree of clarity in what we already know. The novel presents the world through stories of stories, and, despite its own existence, the novel’s plot remains tightly connected to the story. We assume some degree of familiarity with the historical and ideological history of various groups within the White Man’s Army, as discussed in a previous episode:
“What’s happening in that world is so fundamental. All cultures are on one continuum. People of all groups come together. This is why American society has been so good. There is a feeling of community here. There is all the people of all races and ethnicities. There are things you can do. There’s power. There are laws. And there are people at the centre of it who need to know the status of their country in the eyes of their neighbours and who need to be respected and respected. There are things that you can do without taking any action. There’s violence. There are people you are expected to respect… This is what the Japanese did to kill us. When I saw my family murdered by Japanese troops. My grandparents were killed that same year by German soldiers. It’s what really sets the book apart [from other] novels by the Japanese. It’s a story about the war, which is very complex, but also very interesting: the idea behind the war was that this was a war against Japan, and that this was a war against White people, and the Japanese believed that for good or ill that the White people did want their power. Even if that isn’t true, it comes to the realization that everyone in Japanese society is equal. Even if they’re no longer able to control their own emotions, they’re expected to protect themselves. It’s pretty clear that in reality it has to stop.”
On the other hand, the world is divided by the events of this novel. In San San Diego. The novel’s writers have been unable to achieve these values of commonality, and the community is already divided between Black and White members. The people in that society are usually considered enemies. The people’s opinions concerning the Black characters differ greatly. For the most part, the idea of a Black person in the world is almost indistinguishable to the ideas of those within that Black group. There are also Black children involved in these stories, although not quite as prominently as those in Pearl Harbor. The characters of Satsuo, Goro and Shinsuke are not always on the same page, and, when they do take sides, they are often