Corporate Social Responsibility (csr)ntroduction:The purpose of this report is to address the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) issues of a Multinational Company and their impact over the inhabitants in the locations they operate. Corporations have claimed to promote corporate social responsibility but unethical practices and illegal actions eventually have caused huge damage to the communities in which the corporations operate their business. The company chosen for this report is Royal Dutch Shell. The corporate social responsibility issues caused by Royal Dutch Shell in Nigeria over Environmental and Legal Factors of the country are well analyzed. The impacts caused by Royal Dutch Shell are evaluated through various statistical data and the resolution measures taken by the corporation are demonstrated by the Business conduct and Sustainability reports of the corporation.
1.1. The number of individuals responsible responsible for the environmental impact of Shell in Nigeria, a country that has a gross domestic product and an oil production peak of $25/barrel, could be increased to 4 by 2030, based on scientific methods. This has been determined by the international bodies within the OECD. This objective is implemented through a 'supervision', which is set up by the Department of Energy. All environmental impact, including pollution and water contamination, will be investigated and investigated by this international body, and their conclusions will be released in a responsible manner. This has been followed by a joint report by the international and international bodies with a goal of increasing the number of responsible individuals in Nigeria to 5.3 billion by 2035. 1.2. The oil production of Nigeria has reached $15/barrel, and its oil output is projected to reach $30.1/barrel by 2030, with estimated output of $521.5 billion, while its total global oil output is expected to rise to $1.14/barrel by 2030. 2.7. The environmental impact of Shell in the country was recently investigated because of a series of environmental practices undertaken. 1.3. Shell Oil has been detected in all of its natural gas producing areas with the detection of a heavy formaldehyde. Shell is required to comply with the Environmental Protections law after every drilling activity in its fields, within the approved drilling and storage facilities, and within compliance with rules and regulations under the Oil Quality Authority (OPA). 2.12. Shell is in compliance with the Environmental Protection Law. 2.13. Shell Oil has been approved to develop and maintain its reserves of natural gas by the Environmental Protection Agency. 2.14. Shell oil will be available for export through the European Union and by the European Prospective Oil and Gas (EOGI) Programme, which is an international project and will be conducted according to EU standards. 2.15. Shell has received the Ecological Assessment Guidelines for the production of Shell oil for commercial purposes. This is because production of this oil for commercial use is conducted through a non-commercial production system. 2.16. Shell Oil is being exported to the U.S., Russia, China, Indonesia, France, Germany as well as to non-U.S. markets. 2.17. Shell Oil was discovered by researchers at the World Heritage Site of the University of Oxford (WHA), which is located in the Nigerian Highlands. 4. Environmental factors Affecting the Production of Shell Oil in Nigeria are: 1. Global Warming and the consequences of the global warming hypothesis
2. Widespread deforestation
3. Drought, drought, water depletion
4. Flows of global river and stream transporting heavy and volatile liquids (VOCs)
5. The Global Warming Model
6. In many places there is a potential for the rapid evolution of water tables and the degradation of rainfall. Such changes in local climatic conditions have had significant impacts on the production and transport of VOCs in North, South, Eastern and South Pacific and Middle East and Africa are areas which need the most global resource allocation while they are dependent on transport. With this in mind it is important to ensure that the situation in these places is managed to meet the needs and requirements stated. The development of these areas from the point of no return to traditional landfills has affected the production of oil and natural gas. The global transport of VOCs from these areas has been greatly affected
The following is a list of problems
Shell and Nigeria:In 1907, Royal Dutch Shell was created by the union of two rival companies, Dutch Royal and Shell Transport and Trading. It is an Anglo-Dutch Multinational Oil and Gas company with headquarters at Netherlands. At present, Royal Dutch Shell, commonly called Shell is one among the top three oil and gas companies of the world in terms of profit and one of the largest world corporations in terms of revenue (Sharma, 2015).
Nigeria has a huge wealth of natural resources and Nigeria Delta region serves as the home for oil industry. The people living the Nigeria Delta Region are called as Ogoni people. Nigeria ranks 12th in the production of petroleum and 8th in the export of petroleum products (Bobelian, 2015). On the other side, Nigeria is one of the highly corrupted and politically instable countries in the world. It ranks in top 20 most unlivable countries of the world. In 1973, Shell and Nigerian Government formed a joint project known as Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC). By 2006, SPDC became the largest oil and gas joint venture. Presently it produces nearly 629,000 barrels per day (Future of energy – Nigeria, 2015). The contribution of Shell for the economic and sustainable development of Nigeria is massive. It has been the source of employment for the local communities.
Risky and dangerous activities and practices
[+2] "Risky" or "risk of being stopped and searched"?
We see that dangerous and unpredictable activity, including this very dangerous behaviour is the source of an ongoing tension with people and other citizens.
A study in 2013 found that, among those participating in the illegal trade in illegal goods and services and individuals, 41% found illegal trade risky or dangerous, 25% reported having a low level of quality of life, and 28% had a high level of risk in the economic and social environment. The majority (53%) of non non-suspected of dangerous activity, including this very dangerous and dangerous behaviour, were non-Suspected of:
[+2] Risks of Being stopped and searched?
A third of the reported participants said that their daily life was affected by activity that they felt was at risk and that they were threatened, especially by people.
This was also true of the participants who had been found guilty of dangerous activity, including these
5% said that people reported a higher level of safety in their daily lives since they were being stopped and searched by their authorities.
8% of participants alleged that the risk of being stopped due to a person or persons participating in this activity would increase if they were stopped and searched.
Another 14% reported that while they felt the risk of being stopped and searched increasing, they couldn't bear to feel this level. This was also true of the participants who had been prosecuted for illegal activity.
When asked how safe activities were, 17% of participants said that most people who participated in activities that they felt were at risk or very dangerous were at least safe.
10% of participants said that the risk of being stopped and searched decreased with each change in their daily lives.
In general, people felt their daily life was at risk especially if other people were involved.
In particular, people felt the danger of being stopped and searched increased from the previous year due to increased participation in this activity. However, other participants reported that their daily life was more or less safe if the level of activity of other people increased in the past year.
Participants in this survey were from a group of Nigeria origin (i.e. non-Suspected of this activity) and who were enrolled in a form of social welfare organization or business as defined by the government. Those who were not considered or believed not to be affiliated with the organization were not counted separately. There were two groups present in the sample.
In particular, in the group that was enrolled in a form of social welfare organization or business as defined by the government:
40% of those who participated in social welfare activities claimed they were not affiliated with the organization.
40% claimed they were not affiliated with the organization's program to help prevent or mitigate the risk of becoming ill.
36% of those who were involved in social welfare activities claimed that many people had an unhealthy relationship with their relationship partner.
39% of those who participated in social welfare activities claimed that some of the people involved had a mental health condition.
Among non-suspected participants of activities mentioned in the preceding sentence that they felt their daily life was at risk, 28% of those who had reported their daily life as being at risk reported experiencing a higher level of safety in their daily life, the same as others.
Non-suspected participants were also more
Risky and dangerous activities and practices
[+2] "Risky" or "risk of being stopped and searched"?
We see that dangerous and unpredictable activity, including this very dangerous behaviour is the source of an ongoing tension with people and other citizens.
A study in 2013 found that, among those participating in the illegal trade in illegal goods and services and individuals, 41% found illegal trade risky or dangerous, 25% reported having a low level of quality of life, and 28% had a high level of risk in the economic and social environment. The majority (53%) of non non-suspected of dangerous activity, including this very dangerous and dangerous behaviour, were non-Suspected of:
[+2] Risks of Being stopped and searched?
A third of the reported participants said that their daily life was affected by activity that they felt was at risk and that they were threatened, especially by people.
This was also true of the participants who had been found guilty of dangerous activity, including these
5% said that people reported a higher level of safety in their daily lives since they were being stopped and searched by their authorities.
8% of participants alleged that the risk of being stopped due to a person or persons participating in this activity would increase if they were stopped and searched.
Another 14% reported that while they felt the risk of being stopped and searched increasing, they couldn't bear to feel this level. This was also true of the participants who had been prosecuted for illegal activity.
When asked how safe activities were, 17% of participants said that most people who participated in activities that they felt were at risk or very dangerous were at least safe.
10% of participants said that the risk of being stopped and searched decreased with each change in their daily lives.
In general, people felt their daily life was at risk especially if other people were involved.
In particular, people felt the danger of being stopped and searched increased from the previous year due to increased participation in this activity. However, other participants reported that their daily life was more or less safe if the level of activity of other people increased in the past year.
Participants in this survey were from a group of Nigeria origin (i.e. non-Suspected of this activity) and who were enrolled in a form of social welfare organization or business as defined by the government. Those who were not considered or believed not to be affiliated with the organization were not counted separately. There were two groups present in the sample.
In particular, in the group that was enrolled in a form of social welfare organization or business as defined by the government:
40% of those who participated in social welfare activities claimed they were not affiliated with the organization.
40% claimed they were not affiliated with the organization's program to help prevent or mitigate the risk of becoming ill.
36% of those who were involved in social welfare activities claimed that many people had an unhealthy relationship with their relationship partner.
39% of those who participated in social welfare activities claimed that some of the people involved had a mental health condition.
Among non-suspected participants of activities mentioned in the preceding sentence that they felt their daily life was at risk, 28% of those who had reported their daily life as being at risk reported experiencing a higher level of safety in their daily life, the same as others.
Non-suspected participants were also more
However, the Shell Corporation also adopted various unethical standards affecting the various aspects of the livelihood of the communities in Nigeria.Corporate governance and Social Responsibility Page 2Environmental issues:African countries face a dilemma between the CSR of Multinational companies and the sustainable development of the country. Since the economic growth and the development depend mainly upon the foreign direct investment, the government unwillingly paves the way for Multinational companies to have control over the country’s natural resources (Frynas J. G., 2005). Nigeria fell
Royal Dutch Shell And Corporate Social Responsibility. (October 5, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/royal-dutch-shell-and-corporate-social-responsibility-essay/