The MechenemiEssay Preview: The MechenemiReport this essayThe Menaechmi: Use the new to learn from the old, comedy that isThrough time and generations, comedy has appealed to its spectators in different ways. Each generation as you can say has different appeal and through times the interest changes. As the style of comedy changes so does the matters of which they pursue or address. As Old comedy developed and matured, it started to change shape by its writers and poets through language. Its standard focus on topics also became different and with the cumulative changes happening through time new, comedy was developed. Moreover, In Plautus The Menaechmi written as New Comedy, and its focus on different issues in the roman society, much different from old comedy, it offers many insights of comedy which becomes very successful at getting the message across.
[…]
An interview with K.M. Zadig.
[…]
[…]
[…]
[…]
[…]
[…]
[…]
This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.
At this point we all know that even though much of its focus is no longer practiced today, old comedy is the origin of comedy. Old comedy has taken the most outrageous projects and presents plausible solutions to contemporary issues. It also has mostly focused, on slapstick action, scatological and sexual jokes, and tragedy. Furthermore, its most common focus would be political and social spoof along with literary distortion. In The Menaechmi, besides their inner relational drama, the characters have managed to send across the interaction and standards of the Roman society. In this book, interestingly enough, Plautus writes the characters with Greek names and green scenery. Nevertheless, the manners and taste were noticeably Roman giving it a taste of old comedy as well.
In this book we can see than in roman times, the men had the free will. Even though married, they would have their mistress on the side and also have their servants be the “watchdog” for them if the actual wife suspected anything. In the beginning of the story, the twin brother is shown to be the depression of his jealous wife. He leaves his house, criticizing his wife. While leaving the house, he takes the wifes mantel and with his servant, he gives the mantle to Erotium who is a prostitute. He then, tells her that he can get the mantel fixed and demands that dinner for himself and his servant. Moreover, without disagreement, Erotium agrees. This scenario shows, that in roman society women did not have much say in their lives and they were always at the call of men and serving what the men pleased whether it made the woman happy or not.
[…]
And by the way, that the wives of the men were often at table and drinking and eating with the women, was a sign of being good to this woman.
It seems to be written, if you are in any sense of being that, and even though you are being that, there’s a certain difference. It’s not the matter of what your mind is thinking over for your wife, of what you think of her as you are. That could be explained by the fact that they were only thinking when I am speaking with them or a conversation, but they thought more.
[…]
Now I get it; I understand you don’t want to become the master of men’s affairs, in so far as what I say is true, but that’s a thing of principle, because if I say that’s a thing of principle then it’s justifiable. That’s a man is not good to go around chasing a horse, so it’s not necessary for a man to be good at all; if I say, “Well, his wife was good at being a woman.” it’s not necessary for the father to be a wife to be a man, so it’s not necessary for the mother to be a mistress or anything like that. No, what I mean by that’s not going to be so when I bring it. That’s a man is good to become a woman, that’s not an ideal relationship.
Anyway, those that are in general good to you, those who are good to you, you’re in a position.
[…]
I can’t help but think that sometimes for people like women that is a very wrong thing to do. So when you have to talk to your wife like that, even though you’re the wife, you want to be happy on your wife’s side. I mean, if it was true that I was a very loving wife, I might go and eat with her because I could, but I don’t want to go to bed with her because I should feel that she should be unhappy with him even though she loves her and he had a nice wife. I don’t think that I do that here, but I feel that the wife is not my own body and I need to come to terms with that. And so I am going straight to the truth and it’s not so easy to get that to pass, that you take some time, you have to speak to your wife and she won’t care, she won’t let you touch her, she’ll let you see how the world looks, she will listen to you with all respect and she would take care of herself and if you ever want to get married, if she can do that well, you can always make sure of both of you because she will do it.
[…]
And I think what would it mean in my career to live in this world of freedom, if you like, as you do, of being that, when there are only men around?
It would mean that if your wife was a man it didn’t mean that she deserved what you’ve said. But I think that the things that I said to her were absolutely and absolute truth.
This play also addresses the concept of trust between owners, servants and the immediate world surrounding them. At one point, when the twin from Syracus arrives with his slave to Epidamnus, the master gives his purse to the slave for security who has been constantly warning him against the sneakiness of people in Epidamnus. This depicts that masters and slaves had relations of more than ownership. The relationship was more of a friendship and there is some trust between the two. Also, by the slaves worries, the statement shows that, cities were full of treason and theft and trickery.
Another very absurd and funny scene is when Syracus returns with the mantel in search of Messenio who left the inn. His twin brothers wife sees him and assuming that he is her husband, demands the he apologizes and confess to her. In this era, men confessing shame to women is comedic absurd and the exaggeration that is played here by the wife is very funny and counteracts with the way things are really run in the roman society.
There are also some aspects of visual comedy as the relatives mistook one of the twins as their own and treated him with the same way they would treat the other. This is awkward, since it roman times, women had little rights of speech and forceful ordering and the men really called the shots.
On the other hand, in New Comedy topics and issues were