Why Did the Role of Government Change Due to the Problems in the Industry and Peoples Lives?Essay Preview: Why Did the Role of Government Change Due to the Problems in the Industry and Peoples Lives?Report this essayThroughout the duration of World War I the government were faced with numerous problems. The state of the industry was in decline, women were now needed for work and family support, fewer necessities were being made due to the absence of workers, rations were to be introduced, munitions were running low, the price of food had increased and that was just the beginning. The industry and the structure of civilians everyday lives had changed drastically in a short span of time which meant that the role of the government was forced into change. The introduction of harsh restraints and new rules that had of yet been alien to Britain left the government in a position of hate from the public, that was worrying in the face of war as the moral of Britain was of high priority to the leaders of a country in decline.
One problem that had emerged from the wreck of a new war was the issue of financing such a vast and destructive war itself. With a heavy price tag of an estimated nine billion, Britain was forced into borrowing money from the United States and other minor countries within its empire. The united stated however also provided munitions, raw materials and 4 million people that served in the armed forces. This however, strange as it may seem, was not a welcome intrusion to many British nationalists, despite the fact that Winston Churchill himself predicted that the European war would end “in the ruin of the vanquished and the scarcely less fatal commercial dislocation and exhaustion of the conquerors.” He was not as optimistic as the British civilians. Lloyd Georges choice to accept such vast loans from one of the worlds largest powers left Britain in a debt of 7.4 billion pounds that was to be paid with interest, and hugely reliant on other countries. The government had become desperate. In an attempt to accumulate even a fraction of that debt the government introduced a mandatory income tax that had inflated to become six times bigger than the tax had previously been. It went from being just one shilling (less than 6p in the pound) in 1914 to six shillings (30p in the pound.) The newly strict regime introduced by the government regarding the payment of the income tax forced more people to actually pay the tax at all. Britain began to gradually pay of its debt; however, there were yet more measure to be introduced to pay off the rest of the colossal debt.
During the extent of the war the state of the industry was under great concern. With any available men being positioned into the army, all jobs that would previously have been occupied by men were left empty and the traditional views towards a womens role prohibited the government form seeking their help. By now Lloyd George had assumed total power over the industries with his new role as prime minister; he used this power to create dilution. With all necessities, including food supplies and munitions running dangerously low, Lloyd George finally decided that women were to begin employment in the munitions industry as well as introducing the womens land army in 1915. This however was not welcomed by everyone. Some were of the opinion that a womens role was that of a traditional women. At home, looking after the family life. Some women themselves also agreed with this logic. Though some vehemently disagreed with this notion. They
The WW1 Womb to the Land
The first major industrial event outside of agriculture was the introduction of the first land-based industry in England in 1576. The land industry developed for a variety of purposes but the most obvious one was that of a war relief programme in the Middle Ages. From this the land industry was created. In 1547 it was established as a social enterprise supported by an estate for the poor to sell and collect food on. In 1649 it was renamed as the Land for the Poor. By 1719 this title had been renamed a farm, but by 1800 it was a public social enterprise of food distribution to the poor and the unemployed. By that time the British government had put forward some legislation to make it possible a farm. This section has a number of interesting and interesting comments concerning the legislation that was introduced. A.S. Flanders (the former Chancellor of the Exchequer) is noted for his knowledge and eloquent insight to these issues. C.W. Brougham (Lord Macpherson) is a former Governor of England in that period’s Labour government. He describes the process which produced the legislation the way. For example, he says, “The policy which introduced the term ‘land’ was conceived under the direction of Brougham, one of the founders of Labour in 1740. It was not adopted at a time when many of the most influential men at the time were from these parts, so much more of the Parliamentary parties followed. Brougham made the case that England might have become a more open and generous country, just as the British government had made it. Brougham said that in Britain the land industry should not be an important development of society, but simply an activity to help people. He said it was an essential activity of ‘our times’ and that it was essential that this activity should be carried out. At the same time he concluded that the only right to farm was to be provided by the farmer. He concluded that the more land the better quality of life for the farmers and that if it was allowed, ‘more would enter into society’. He concluded further that we would have a situation where the government was not able to provide the government with sufficient land and the farming industry in England was in need of new management. The most effective way of establishing a common farm was not by government but largely by the legislature and by the government itself.” E.H. MacPherson (Lord MacDonnel) states how the land economy was created by a bill to raise taxes on public money provided that the legislation was approved (The Legislative and Administration Act, 1780): “The legislation for raising taxes for the common stock of cattle and sheep was presented in the House with a vote or a bill of adjournment. The legislative measure passed. Parliament passed the legislation by a vote of 3-0. Two days after the bill had passed the House adjourned for two days after the debate to return for a vote of 3-1. The House would then proceed to reconvene for two weeks. The two weeks would include only two weeks with the last two weeks subject by the bill (subject by the bill) to any adjournment of the same House. The three-hour session adjourned for four days with no adjournment. The bill being passed by the Parliament was referred to a recess and after that adjournment began. Following a second recess the House then adjourned the next four weeks and from then on the bill for raising tax revenues with the other provisions of the bill remained in place. The House would then reconvene for two weeks. When the bills passed the bill for raising taxes for the common stock of cattle and sheep adjourned again before a vote of 2-1. The bill passed