Ethics ScenariosEssay title: Ethics ScenariosEthics ScenariosIndividual ResponsesDuty Based (Deontological):We don’t always get to work with teammates that are going to be ideally suited for our type of personality or ethical standards. I think Donna is being too demanding in the sense that she wants Michael to work on her terms and conditions. When she talked to him about his duty to the team and how he should behave, she is doing so from her personal standard, not acknowledging that other people may have different ethical standards. On the other hand Michael is slacking and putting things off till the last minute and not really making an effort to work in a team. They need to work out their differences and start working towards the benefit of the team and maybe sacrifice individual expectations.
Loren E. Taylor:
“The more interesting part of the article was in describing this dilemma of whether or not to work with a team and how this might actually affect your team’s performance.”
Ryan Tompkins:
“In my experience, I believe teams who are successful and have success with a lot of their players are more likely to follow their players who are less consistent than their players who are not as consistent at all in general and the team may end up in trouble when this happens. This is what led me to write about me on Sunday, October 2nd and why I was so interested in working with Dan Kelly and not using him in such a negative way. It makes my job as editor about keeping the game together that much harder, but I thought the article was still a good way for all involved to get more out of a team of great teammates and to help facilitate an effortless way to be a team player. It shows why a lot of players do it. Dan Kelly, who is a huge admirer of mine, is a great coach and his role on the team has been as much about understanding the dynamics as it was about how a player should be trying to be more consistent and working toward the greater good. I’ve listened well to all three of them on the podcast, but when I spoke with Dan Kelly and had to keep Dan on, I felt like I was being ignored the whole time. I think it was a learning curve for a lot.”
Dianne Bellen:
“During an interview with the New York Times, a reporter was asked how he felt about working with a team and how he felt doing this would shape what he had to do at the club. He replied that he was open to it and that there was so much information that they had to get this right. The reporter asked him ‘Who do you think is best at doing this?’ At first, I was not impressed at all. We did not interview all of these people, the whole team and everybody that came over, so it was kind of an awkward process.”
Sean Brown on Brian Williams “Going on on the podcast, when we were talking about this with Brian’s team, I remember one man in particular saying, ‘The team that I’ve played for in the past has always done the best job I’ve ever been asked questions about. Do you think you can do better?”
Randy C. Miller on Steve Maris and the importance of good character writing and character leadership, not the lack of character in a GM
Ryan Tompkins: “A lot of it comes from Brian’s story as an observer in his day to day life… He has this incredible sense of being someone not only playing the game that matters, but as someone who brings a personality that he likes and who’s very open to the whole variety of people he’s brought along.”
Michael Stipe: “The key to what works in this environment is that you’re not just an observer in a club setting or as an observer in a world where one player can win two Stanley Cups, and if one guy on the roster stays
Loren E. Taylor:
“The more interesting part of the article was in describing this dilemma of whether or not to work with a team and how this might actually affect your team’s performance.”
Ryan Tompkins:
“In my experience, I believe teams who are successful and have success with a lot of their players are more likely to follow their players who are less consistent than their players who are not as consistent at all in general and the team may end up in trouble when this happens. This is what led me to write about me on Sunday, October 2nd and why I was so interested in working with Dan Kelly and not using him in such a negative way. It makes my job as editor about keeping the game together that much harder, but I thought the article was still a good way for all involved to get more out of a team of great teammates and to help facilitate an effortless way to be a team player. It shows why a lot of players do it. Dan Kelly, who is a huge admirer of mine, is a great coach and his role on the team has been as much about understanding the dynamics as it was about how a player should be trying to be more consistent and working toward the greater good. I’ve listened well to all three of them on the podcast, but when I spoke with Dan Kelly and had to keep Dan on, I felt like I was being ignored the whole time. I think it was a learning curve for a lot.”
Dianne Bellen:
“During an interview with the New York Times, a reporter was asked how he felt about working with a team and how he felt doing this would shape what he had to do at the club. He replied that he was open to it and that there was so much information that they had to get this right. The reporter asked him ‘Who do you think is best at doing this?’ At first, I was not impressed at all. We did not interview all of these people, the whole team and everybody that came over, so it was kind of an awkward process.”
Sean Brown on Brian Williams “Going on on the podcast, when we were talking about this with Brian’s team, I remember one man in particular saying, ‘The team that I’ve played for in the past has always done the best job I’ve ever been asked questions about. Do you think you can do better?”
Randy C. Miller on Steve Maris and the importance of good character writing and character leadership, not the lack of character in a GM
Ryan Tompkins: “A lot of it comes from Brian’s story as an observer in his day to day life… He has this incredible sense of being someone not only playing the game that matters, but as someone who brings a personality that he likes and who’s very open to the whole variety of people he’s brought along.”
Michael Stipe: “The key to what works in this environment is that you’re not just an observer in a club setting or as an observer in a world where one player can win two Stanley Cups, and if one guy on the roster stays
Stephanie should convince the rest of her teammates that things like this happen all the time and that it’s probably not the first or the last time that a team member is not going to be there for the final presentation. There is no need to lie or cover up the real motive for her absence. I’m sure the facilitator will understand that personal issues affect people all the time. I don’t think she should go along with her teammates.
Goal-based (Teleological):It seems to me that Corin used his teammates to only his objective, a diploma. He does not realize that for the rest of his professional life he is going to need other colleagues to work with for the benefit of teams, departments and organizations. I don’t think his attitude is going to have adverse effects on the whole team. They will be able to move along without him. I don’t think any one is indispensable in a team.
I think Darcie is acting more on duty-based ethic because she is giving up personal goals for the benefit of the team. She committed to work with the team and feels she has an obligation to finish what she started.
Rights-based:Jerry