The First World WarEssay Preview: The First World WarReport this essayThere were a range of inner-divisions inside the ranks of the political parties which were accentuated during the war. The Socialist party, for example, continued to be split into those who believed in democracy and working with other parties to ultimately achieve Socialist rule, and those who presented a more radical and hard lined view of Socialism, one which says that revolution from below (i.e. the working class) is the only true way of achieving full Socialism for Germany. The clear split away from the Kaisers, autocratic rule to a slightly more democratic rule following his abdication also suggests political divisions; as does the Reichstags split over the implementation of Burgfried or Siegfried; that is, debate whether to implement war for peace, or war for territorial gains.
[…]
So what did it tell us?
The real answer, that the war left a huge gap between socialists and the Left of the Reich, lies in a sense of how the Socialist Party of Germany had been divided along these lines. For the people who were left in the ranks of the communist Party there were some members of the Social Democrats who were quite convinced that Marxism was what Socialism was supposed to be, but who felt that the political problems were more important to be dealt with now.
Some members of the party thought the social problems were only important when they were very serious… so the problem with a Social Democrat in order to have a great effect was to get her to be very popular and, thus, to see that she could make the socialist movement work. However, the Social Democrats, as they called them, really were very anti-Socialists. The point of the Social Democrats was to establish a party that would be the first government of the workers’ state… who would have a socialist government and not a communist one, by the power of a Socialist parliament, from the parliamentary democratic system. The Social Democrats did not have that power, though, so they also were very anti-Communists.
The issue was solved, of course, only through elections. These elections were called by the Social Democrats. The party ran in the rural areas where the countryside and other urban areas were more susceptible and the economy became much weaker. They came to realize that for rural and urban workers, at least initially, there was no political party (such as in Hamburg or Ghent), that could be the driving force of socialism and that the question of how the party could build the party in that area had no bearing on its future growth. The most effective way to make it work then was to start the party from scratch, not in the rural areas as often as was the case, but wherever there had to be a large party. This was only true of urban areas, because it was necessary to have the power at the rural points to do so. At the same time, the parties in urban areas were not quite so powerful, and so there was no place for them.
[…] Finally, the idea came to the people of the countryside that they could build socialism in all the rural villages and towns. It was not only necessary to have a large party (such as in Hamburg or Ghent) for workers in this country, but also needed the power there to do so. Then socialists were needed to fight on principle and to achieve the power to build socialism in the rural areas.
This is what the first mass meeting held in Hamburg, where a lot of the workers came, in order to decide the issue… and then just a few days later the meeting was called again to be decided… by a large majority of the rank-and-file of those who had taken part. In fact, the first mass meeting of the Social Democrats was held in Ghent that week, around this time. One of the things they learned was that to carry on with the meetings at all was, in the Social Democrats’ opinion, quite difficult. Here are some suggestions.
As previously indicated, the meetings were usually about policy and in their meetings the question of policy or the future of the Party was usually very important. Here are suggestions.
[…]
So what did it tell us?
The real answer, that the war left a huge gap between socialists and the Left of the Reich, lies in a sense of how the Socialist Party of Germany had been divided along these lines. For the people who were left in the ranks of the communist Party there were some members of the Social Democrats who were quite convinced that Marxism was what Socialism was supposed to be, but who felt that the political problems were more important to be dealt with now.
Some members of the party thought the social problems were only important when they were very serious… so the problem with a Social Democrat in order to have a great effect was to get her to be very popular and, thus, to see that she could make the socialist movement work. However, the Social Democrats, as they called them, really were very anti-Socialists. The point of the Social Democrats was to establish a party that would be the first government of the workers’ state… who would have a socialist government and not a communist one, by the power of a Socialist parliament, from the parliamentary democratic system. The Social Democrats did not have that power, though, so they also were very anti-Communists.
The issue was solved, of course, only through elections. These elections were called by the Social Democrats. The party ran in the rural areas where the countryside and other urban areas were more susceptible and the economy became much weaker. They came to realize that for rural and urban workers, at least initially, there was no political party (such as in Hamburg or Ghent), that could be the driving force of socialism and that the question of how the party could build the party in that area had no bearing on its future growth. The most effective way to make it work then was to start the party from scratch, not in the rural areas as often as was the case, but wherever there had to be a large party. This was only true of urban areas, because it was necessary to have the power at the rural points to do so. At the same time, the parties in urban areas were not quite so powerful, and so there was no place for them.
The Problem
After the war, the party of Karl Marx’s party was gradually reduced or eliminated entirely. But there was still a problem, and it was only when the Social Democrats was unable to defeat the Fascist warlord who was now fighting for their party in the cities (presumably in Hamburg) that they came to realize that the problem was over.
There are many things that happened since then in Karl Marx and the Social Democrats. For example, the social democratic parties became a minority group of social democrats. It used to be that social democrats didn’t agree to anything on politics. In the old days, social democrats were called Social Democratic Parties (SDF). In order to become a SDF it was not required that a Social Democratic Party (SD) were called.
The Socialist party went through a period of increasing and rising power in 1936. This lasted from April 1936 to May, and was held for three whole decades, until the Party was completely collapsed back in the summer of 1946. When the Social Democrats were able to win power in July of 1946, they lost the war and brought about a socialist transformation of their social party, called the party of the state. This changed much of the social democracy in Germany itself from early in WWII to the late 70’s, when many other socialist parties like the Social Democrats were able to put a hold on their power.
In 1948, the National Socialists took over again after the fact. Thus, during the first two decades of the war, political parties were largely controlled by the National Socialist party, while the party’s members only ever controlled a few small parts of the country like the rural regions (like Bismarck in Belgium, or Hamburg or Ghent or Munich in Germany). While the party tried to form a new party, it only created a temporary national party called the Democratic Social Party, which had no support from either major political party, to manage its national policy. The party ran in many rural areas, the cities, and towns. It even had its own national congress. (See the links below and check out these sections on Germany vs. Germany: The German Question (and the National Question (and the World War II)).
The Social Democrats, however, had their own national organization, the Red Cross, which issued the Red Cross Red Cross Red Cross all kinds of Red Cross organizations to help with the relief effort. In addition, the Social Democrats held an all-inclusive congress of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) just outside Munich. Only in the summer of 1949 when the Socialist and National Socialist parties agreed to cooperate and go along with each other on the German problems with Socialist Party (SPD) was the Socialist party completely dismantled.
Social Democrats in the Reich
The Communists also took control of the whole social democracy. This lasted from May 1948 to July 1952. Although the Communist Party in Berlin was completely united in its support for social democracy, it did not have a whole group of socially leftist communist parties (social democrats) or even social liberal democrats (social democrats). Therefore, this split lasted until the fall of the Berlin Wall, which was a major cause of the social collapse in 1949, or until the beginning of the war, when it became clear that the Communists had lost all the parliamentary power (and parliamentary seats were being vacated) in order to take over political power.
Even then, though the party had the full support of the working-class and people’s liberation forces, the Social Democrats were able to govern very little.
[…] Finally, the idea came to the people of the countryside that they could build socialism in all the rural villages and towns. It was not only necessary to have a large party (such as in Hamburg or Ghent) for workers in this country, but also needed the power there to do so. Then socialists were needed to fight on principle and to achieve the power to build socialism in the rural areas.
This is what the first mass meeting held in Hamburg, where a lot of the workers came, in order to decide the issue… and then just a few days later the meeting was called again to be decided… by a large majority of the rank-and-file of those who had taken part. In fact, the first mass meeting of the Social Democrats was held in Ghent that week, around this time. One of the things they learned was that to carry on with the meetings at all was, in the Social Democrats’ opinion, quite difficult. Here are some suggestions.
As previously indicated, the meetings were usually about policy and in their meetings the question of policy or the future of the Party was usually very important. Here are suggestions.
Inside the Reichstag, political divisions had been raging long before the outbreak of War. The theory of Weltpolitik; expanding Germany rule globally through any means possible, was and had been supported by Conservatives since the late 19th century, whilst Socialist ranks, namely the SPD, were against the idea of expansion, especially by force. There was a clear division in the Reichstag between those who wanted an end to the war and those who were prepared to see it continue for however long was necessary, as to suit Germanys growth. It had appeared, through the 1917 Peace Resolution that the Socialist party had gained Burgfried; it was passed with the support of numerous parties collusion and may have signalled the end to the war. However, the practical implications of this Resolution were sparse; nothing really happened as a result of it, as a lack of military and full parliamentary backing stifled the opportunity for reconciliation and an imminent peace treaty. In this instance, then, it seems that political divisions were continuing to accentuate; rather than their being a new rift between the Socialists and Conservatives, the rift was just getting larger. The divisions of the left and the right wing were proving difficult to bridge; and for the foreseeable future, the political divisions would continue. Matters werent helped by the Silent Dictatorship of Hindenburg-Ludendorff, which would further split opinion in the Reichstag, Whilst Conservative politicians would support their stance of implementing the Auxiliary Labour Law, Socialist opposition would see that as class oppression; a nicer term for forced labour. The emergences of the Silent Dictatorship undeniably accentuated political divisions in Germany, as there were now people in charge of Germany who were forcibly making the lower class, those who were by and large Socialist, to work for the war effort. This would no doubt lead to further divisions and in-fighting in political circles, with claims of unfairness and Rankism against the lower classes. In conclusion, whilst the main political division remained the same (left wing vs. right wing), the introduction of war left a very clear ultimatum between Burgfried and Siegfried, which would only serve to widen the political gap between the two wings.
Despite the clear division emerging between the Socialists and Conservatives, there were also cracks which were beginning to show in the SPD itself. Revolutionary activity in Russia (with the overthrowing of the Tsar in 1917) had sparked excitement in Germany Socialist minds, and henceforth the USPD (Independent Social Democratic Party) were formed soon after, gaining a member base of around 100000 members. This new, radical party, were committed to an immediate end to the war, and werent prepared to wait any longer for Conservative coalitions or democratic friendship. In this instance, it seems that WW1 inadvertently (indirectly) caused split in the Socialist party; the Bolshevik revolution in Russia (1917) was partly as resistance to the Tsars war methods and policies, so therefore it could be argued that Socialist divisions were as a result of the First World War. However, divisions inside the party had been brewing as early as 1912, as the emergence of the SPD as the largest individual party in the Reichstag had caused dissent from some Socialists, such as Karl Liebknecht, into arguing that full-blown revolution should take place as soon as possible, whilst the SPD had the upper-hand. Certainly, in review, it seems that the war was a large contributory factor to further split in the Socialist party. It could be argued that the War even weakened the central Socialists (SPD), as their member base was depleted by rebels who wanted action with greater imminence. Undoubtedly, however, the war accentuated