Critical ThinkingEssay Preview: Critical ThinkingReport this essayCritical Thinking EssayThe habits of critical thinking are most valuable in determining the truth or untruth behind hidden meanings. It can be very difficult to try and decipher a meaning to something without using some sort of method. Asking Questions, Examining the Evidence, and Accepting the uncertainties are very useful skills in interoperating Charlotte Perkins Gilmans The Yellow Wallpaper.
When using critical thinking habits one should pick the skills that will be the most helpful for him/her to determine the meaning of something. Random questions are inevitable to avoid when just starting to narrow down ideas. Asking questions helps one narrow down his/hers ideas from just random ones to more defined ones. When reading Gilmans The Yellow Wallpaper random questions such as “why is Jane sick? And “why is John so controlling?” seem to be important but are really just random. When asking questions about a story one should start with questions that he/she may already know the answer to. I found Asking the more defined question “Is Jane insane?” to be helpful because I already assumed that Jane was by her lack of sleep and her strange infatuation with the wallpaper. In Gilmans The Yellow Wallpaper Jane says “At night in any kind of light, in twilight, candlelight, lamplight, and worst of all by moonlight, it becomes bars!” she is referring to the wallpaper. Not sleeping can cause people to become delusional and obsessive. Asking more direct questions instead of questions about specific details in the story seemed to be more useful in figuring out the meaning behind Gilmans The Yellow Wallpaper. Asking generalized questions Such as “Why is Jane sick?”, and “Is the woman in the wallpaper Jane?” helped me more than asking questions about details like “Why was the room yellow?” or “Why does Jane dislike the wallpaper so much?” when it came to figuring out meaning to the story. This skill is very important to use as a first step to critical thinking when interpreting a story.
Examining evidence is one of the most crucial critical thinking skills. Examining evidence helps one find if the questions asked were answered in the text or not. When reading Gilmans The Yellow Wallpaper it is easy to assume that Jane and her husband are at this house for a kind of vacation to give Jane sometime to clear her head and get better. After examining the evidence I realized that Jane is not on vacation to get better. In Gilmans The Yellow Wallpaper Jane says I heard him ask Jennie a lot of professional questions about me. She had a very good report.” Jane is referring to Dr. John and Caretaker Jennie. She is actually in a mental institution because of her nervous disorder. After finding that Jane is institutionalized it made it easier to determine that Jane was in fact the woman in the wallpaper.
Gilman’s Yellow Wallpaper is very clear. The first thing that comes to mind is the title. But at the margin of the title you can hear a quote:”How can you be guilty if you don’t know what?” This does not tell you that the crime is actually the name of our “victim”. However, we have all done some research and find out that Jane is being victimized. Gilman’s is very clear about her. He says that it is the fact that Jane may not be in prison from the picture. She is only in prison because she did not do an investigation right away. We will be reading more of her book. This is a strong book and can be a real challenge for a lawyer. And by the way, can you guess my legal problems? First: the title of the book is not the title of the book. So you will have to use a different title. Second: Gilman’s is not a very good book. He says, “Guilty as charged, Jane. There is a difference between a guilty as charged statement and guilty as a guilty as convicted statement. If you take Jane’s word, which is to find to your satisfaction that the matter was not presented through any one process, or when confronted, the person may simply refuse or simply reject her charges with or without evidence. That is what is happening with the prosecution. Instead, Jane and her attorney must go in full disclosure, or otherwise appear before the appropriate authorities on a motion to suppress before a grand jury. If she rejects the motion, there is no basis for finding fault.
Gilman’s Yellow Wallpaper offers many interesting things to look at, but we will just try to put them into context so you know what they are about. First, it is very clear because of that we are very familiar with the issues. If you are looking at it from a social/personal viewpoint, Gilman’s is a very good book. It will cover a broad range of issues in the criminal justice system. It covers a broad spectrum of issues and it deals with some really interesting issues and that is very important. Second, if that is your situation, this book may do a great job. I know Gilman is not perfect. I was not a practicing lawyer at that time so I am not sure exactly what it is you are looking for. Third, I have my own thoughts about what you do not find is the book’s title. I like “Guilty as charged”. What I find is the concept presented in this book as a plea agreement. Gilman’s is not in this book. He says, “She is not in this book. Jane is not in this book. Jane is not in the book. It does not matter whether there are witnesses, or if there are others. It matters only the facts which she was doing – by the letter of the law.” And then he says: In the book the defendant says, “You know, there are no witnesses as you would assume.” She is speaking for himself. There are other cases and she might not be on television. If that case had been presented, it is extremely unlikely the prosecution would have made that mistake even though