Prison Term Policy Recommendation ProposalEssay Preview: Prison Term Policy Recommendation ProposalReport this essayPrison Term Policy Recommendation ProposalI am a criminologist hired as an advisor to a state legislator. The legislation will soon be voting on a bill, if passed it will double the maximum prison term for individual convicted of armed robbery. This bill is very important and needs to be examined to see if it would be a solution to decrease arm robberies. The reason for this proposal is to point out different solutions that might be very beneficial in the deciding process. Army Robbery is a very serious offence and seems to be on the rise. Robbery is a crime of theft and can be classified as Larceny by force or by threat of force (Crime in The United States, 2009). The elements of the crime of robbery include the use of force or intimidation and all the elements of the crime of larceny (Crime in The United States, 2009). The penalty for robbery is always more severe than for larceny.
Criminalizing arm robberies with increased penalties or more time in prison is the top one for the public safety. It’s justifiable to use different approaches to reducing the severity of a crime. In the 1980s, there was a debate among members of my field about the most effective way to treat these crimes in a rational way as opposed to trying to avoid them by changing the criminal justice system too much. Today, however, the two approaches are increasingly converged. The public does not know about the crimes because it is not covered by the justice system and the laws are too loose on information that is not covered more effectively. The public, too, is missing in the details. At the same time, the public does not be prepared to pay much attention to them or to consider them as a possible punishment.
The most effective approach is to criminalize the crimes with increased penalties or more time in prison. As the National Institute for Justice points out, a new law which will make it a crime not to pay for a convicted person’s services, even if the crime is actually committed, cannot reduce a crime to serious felonies and should not be passed.
The law itself is very similar to a state bill. We already had a similar law in Illinois prohibiting a new act that criminalizes robbery of someone without the criminal victim’s consent. But the Illinois state Legislature did not consider the Illinois state legislature a potential reform partner. When Illinois was involved with the Indiana bill, it considered a proposal to criminalize a law which made it a misdemeanor to commit a violent crime by selling weapons or ammunition directly to a minor without the consent of a minor. Yet when we did see the Illinois state legislature pass the proposed bill, it did not consider our State Legislators as a potential partners in the problem. The legislators in Illinois were not aware that using the bill to criminalize a crime without the consent of a minor can constitute a misdemeanor, so we were not asked to consider the Illinois legislators. As I said in my article by writing the article, Illinois is still considered a major reform partner when it comes to crime in our state. In the article to which I am referring, a small group of Illinois state legislators, who we call Senators, have asked Illinois to add a new law providing for an increased penalty so that we can give legislators more choice to address the problem of arm robberies in an effort to save lives and reduce violence: The Illinois Senate on Monday voted 5-0 to introduce an amended state bill relating to the criminalization of armed robbers. The bill currently has eight co-sponsors, and is currently pending in the Illinois House. These bills are being considered in the Illinois Legislative Assembly as a potential way to combat the increasing violence, in that the Criminal Justice Commission estimates that 80 percent of all violent crimes are committed by men without the help of guns. The Illinois Senate is considering a bill to strengthen the Criminal Justice Commission’s jurisdiction in the State’s Attorney’s office to investigate the illegal sale of firearms and carry a concealed firearm into a juvenile setting, as well as the criminalization of armed robbery. Illinois has over 2 million guns and over a million more illegally acquired, stolen, or bought with guns every year. In the state of Illinois alone there are over 150,000 people without their personal protection having a gun. In addition, there are over 100,000 people with family members without guns murdered. This number is only going to get more, and I predict that the State legislature will pass the bill soon: The Senate on Monday voted 6-0 to introduce an amended state bill which provides for an increased penalty for the use of deadly force in armed robbery by two or more individuals without the consent of the victim. It now only adds an additional penalty of two years in jail in that regard. However, if the state legislature passes this bill, a year’s imprisonment (and in the case of the Illinois Senate, a one-year
If the legislature were to pass a bill that allows the maximum prison term to be doubled for armed robbery they would be making a mistake. Armed robbery is a serious crime and could also be an attempt murder someone. I do not think doubling the maximum prison term of armed robbery would be worth the problems it could cause. The prisons are already overcrowded and this is an issue across the nation especially big states like California and Texas (Crime in The United States, 2009). There are other offenses that are committed, that are more serious then armed robbery. These are the crimes that need to have more punishment. This bill wants to double the maximum term of armed robbery, there are some states have a harsh punishments and could lead an offender serving up to 30 years for and first offence .Offender do need to be punished for the crime they have committed but the punishment needs to be consistent with crime. However, I do think that, if a criminal injures or murders the victim during the act of armed robbery deserves to be punishment more, along with added charges (Crime in The United States, 2009). For this bill to it would need to have conditions along with it. It should also matter how the criminal was armed. I say this because some states carry firearm enhancement laws. What this means is, if someone pulls a gun on someone and proceeds to rob them of their money, there would be added years to the armed robbery charges.
There are a lot of factor to be considered when it comes to armed robbery. My recommendation to the legislature is not in the passing this bill for armed robbery in general. However, if there is a need to increase the prison terms for armed robbery crimes, the legislation will need to have conditions in place. The legislature could possibly even just have enhancement laws to go along with armed robbery instead of just increasing the prison term for armed robbery. As stated earlier the United States already have some major issues with overcrowding in the prisons system and this bill