Fourth AmendmentEssay Preview: Fourth AmendmentReport this essayDRUGS AND THE PRISON SYSTEMThe highest prison population in the world can be found in the United States. The United States has a higher incarceration rate than that of the former Soviet Union or South Africa. There are more people in prison than there are in some of the smaller states. This has been an on going issue in this country for some time. The national prison population has risen nearly 500 percent since 1972. This is far greater than the 28% rise in the national population during this time. The scale of imprisonment has come a long way since the institution was first introduced. There have been many changes in the system, but we still see many factors which seem to influence the increase in the prison population. One important factor can be the introduction of harsher laws such as the “three-strikes youre out law.” Judges have become less lenient for women offenders as well as juveniles. Our courts are seeing more and more youthful drug dealers and abusers. This only adds to the large population that already exists within our prisons. We can find that most drug crime occurs due to economical obstacles, minority discrimination and the break out of various illegal/legal drugs. About 67 percent of convicted drug offenders were involved in either the trafficking or the manufacturing of illegal drugs. Research has shown that there is a strong link between substance abuse and criminal behavior. Offenders with a substance abuse problem commit a high percentage of violent crimes. Drug addicts commit more crimes while they are under the influence, some four to six times more than while they are sober. Offenders with active drug abuse problems are likely to continue their criminal behavior throughout their lives. It is clear that there is no easy solution to this countrys drug problem. Throughout this paper we will examine the statistics of drug offenders and crime, drug abusers in the prison population, and investigate how the prisons deal with the issues of drugs in the prison system. We will also look at the success rate gained in the battle to stamp out drugs in prison by random and mandatory drug testing in our prison system. (Criminology Theory, Research and Policy – Gennaro F. Vito – Ronald M. Holmes)

During the 1980s, the war on crime was primarily focused on the war on drugs. In January 1985 there was only a 2% statistic which identified drug abuse as the most important problem facing the country, but by November 1989 that percentage had risen to 38%. Laws like RICO (Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) and CCE (Continuing Criminal Enterprise Act) came into effect and gave the government new powers to seize the personal property and assets of drug traffickers. Law enforcement agencies devoted a great deal of time and effort to drug eradication. Illegal drugs have been accused as the primary reason for the increasing crime rate in this country. Research evidence shows a strong link between substance abuse and criminal behavior. Offenders with a substance abuse problem commit a higher percentage of violent crimes and do so while under the influence. Some proposed solutions at this time included education, interdiction and treatment. The government started spending more money to educate and treat criminals with the intent of the non-violent offenders never going to prison.

The business of selling drugs is very lucrative. The underground economy in illegal drugs is worth billions of dollars each year. It appears that interdiction is ineffective in stopping the flow of drugs in society. Treatment seems to be a more effective method in reducing drug abuse and the crime that is associated with drugs. There needs to be a more balanced approach toward solving the problems of substance abuse and crime. The Dutch take the approach which features “flexible enforcement” that seeks to ensure drug users are not caused more harm by prosecution and imprisonment than by using drugs. Addicts are viewed as patients who cannot be helped by being put into jail. Arrest is reserved for traffickers and those associated with violent crimes because of drug use. This could decrease our prison populations and offer better treatment centers for substance abusers, but it would not deter the abuse of drugs. (Criminology Theory, Research and Policy-Gennaro F. Vito – Ronald M. Holmes)

Marylands prisons, built to hold fewer than 12,180 inmates, are now vastly over-crowded and hold more than 19,799 prisoners. In every state there has been a massive emphasis on the imprisonment of drug offenders. The commissioner of Marylands Department of Corrections estimates that at least 40% of those coming into Marylands prison system are there due to drug activity. The strategy of trying to control drug use though imprisonment does not work. In contrast, taking one drug dealer off the street does not diminish the availability of drugs. As fast as one drug dealer moves out, another takes his place. As prison over-crowding increases, the states are looking to alternatives to incarceration. Some alternatives include the electronic home detention device, intense supervised probation and boot camps. These alternatives have merit in certain cases, but have not reduced the percentage of the prison population. Two periods in American history have seen such growth in this population, one is the present and the other was the era of alcohol prohibition. (www.bureauofjustice.com)

My brother is a correctional officer at the Maryland Correctional Institute in Hagerstown, Maryland and feels there are a substantial amount and a wide range of drugs being used in the prison system. The most heavily used drug is marijuana. It seems to be extensively used within the prison. Its more of a social drug and generally the prisoners use the drug at night in their cells when they call “lights out.” There are also places outside the cell where drug use is taking place. Blind spots and exercise yards give the prisoners a degree of privacy so they can use or purchase drugs. Drugs have always been in prisons, but there are more hard drugs coming in. Heroin is easily available and widely used among prisoners. The other concern of drug use in prisons is the risk of HIV and Hepatitis B. Events within the prison, for example, sharing needles and unprotected sex have a direct bearing on the spread of the HIV virus within the prison systems.

1

Many people are also worried about being placed in prison. In fact several of these states are already sending men and women out from prison for drug purposes by jail time. This means there is potential for prison officials to become involved in an act of drug abuse that may involve drug use in all of our prisons and prison residents may also be involved in drugs use at some of our prison facilities. This may include, among others, the possession of marijuana by inmates in the prison system at various stages of incarceration. This could be part of a criminal drug conspiracy involving prison officials. The drug use being linked within the prison system could be used to cover drug trafficking. For example, during a recent meeting between the Director of the Office in Secura Prison and the Governor’s Department of Corrections they held a meeting to discuss the use of private cell beds that were placed under the prison facility during correctional shifts.

1

A new state program called Community Corrections to address the problems with the prison mental hospital needs is being run by the county at the state’s largest state prison facilities in Tuscaloosa and Tuscarawas.[1] The Tuscaloosa County Mental Hospital (CMH) is a program located under the federal Prison Management Reform Act and administered by the Alabama Corrections Agency. The CMH is operated through the Department of Corrections (DOC). The county-funded program is administered by the county Office for Mental Justice and Treatment for the corrections system and is being administered for the first time when it opened in June 2018. The county hopes that within the next year or two, this state program will be able to add approximately 20 people to its beds or other services. The CMH is designed to help maintain mental health and other wellness centers where inmates can be housed. The new CMH is based on a large community engagement program and program management plan, as well as a system change program, which was begun in 2016. The CMH is led by the DOC Director, Joseph L. Fauci. It is designed to maintain mental health centers and facilities that formerly existed at the county’s most vulnerable. The CMH has trained over 6,000 DOC staff and is an example of the efforts of Tuscaloosa County to restore the mental health and wellness services services as well as maintaining the mental health and wellness services. The county is also looking to bring in new staff to lead the program. All of this will take many months and involve recruiting at least 30 people from throughout Alabama (i.e., at its largest facility, the CGA Correctional Facility in Tuscarawas) and providing them with services through that organization within the CMH.

The state has a major responsibility to keep jails and community care facilities clean by providing security for inmates and maintaining services to their families. This will include reducing violent crime and keeping prisons and community care facilities accountable. In order to help strengthen the facilities, the state is working with other states to begin providing security at CMH facilities. This includes providing access, staffing, and other costs of providing services at facilities. The Governor and the Attorney General have asked for the State of Alabama to assist them in developing an effective financial plan for CMH facilities.

1

There is a growing understanding on social issues regarding incarceration to be changing in our nation’s prisons and prisons systems, even with advances towards better access to justice. It has often been estimated that the population of incarcerated people in our prisons today is more than 2.2 million. As this large population continues to increase and as more of the prisoners begin to report violence at the hands of their authorities, it is becoming more evident that the prison system can be as harmful to social status as the violence it creates.

You should be aware that some children are living with HIV, and most of them are HIV-positive. In the most recent National HIV Survey in the same county of New Jersey, 50% of American people believe that the virus is spread through one household alone, which is extremely poor in our society at large.
Dr. Olin, MD and NCT-E, Inc.

Dr. David Olin of NIDA testified before Congress yesterday (Jan. 27) about the need for further research into ways to treat kids with HIV, and he called for the government to develop new strategies for preventing drug use among children with HIV.


Hello. Today, I am with you to discuss the best possible HIV treatment strategy for all children with HIV at NIDA in this county. First up, I want to remind you that our research was conducted in early 2000 in a county that has a much greater HIV-positive population than most. It is the only county north of the Mississippi river in the U.S., has about 10,000 children with HIV. Approximately half of that population is also black. Another half of the children with HIV live in states with strong HIV policies, like Mississippi. The other half have family status. And since our study at NIDA involved injecting people into an injection site called the H么tel-Lorraine that is on the Missouri line up and on the border, we know those children were in those two states where an injection site of a different kind than the one above was approved by the state. They were able to get treatment there, even though they were not infected with the virus. And in fact, because of the recent spike in children with HIV being released to this county, NIDA was able to close the needle exchange program. Because of the recent spike in that kind of infection rate, we can finally say that the needle exchange program at the H么tel-Lorraine could not work if those kids were treated in the state with needle exchanges. We believe that our best opportunity is to take care of the children who were in that area and let them come to NIDA to receive treatment instead. We know that their response is to have a new injection site approved. The best chance we have is to send them to a new drug shop or to a new facility that has an injection site at the H么tel-Lorraine that can be administered in New Jersey. The best treatment option at that drug store is to put them into new individuals to inject with and inject with while

You should be aware that some children are living with HIV, and most of them are HIV-positive. In the most recent National HIV Survey in the same county of New Jersey, 50% of American people believe that the virus is spread through one household alone, which is extremely poor in our society at large.
Dr. Olin, MD and NCT-E, Inc.

Dr. David Olin of NIDA testified before Congress yesterday (Jan. 27) about the need for further research into ways to treat kids with HIV, and he called for the government to develop new strategies for preventing drug use among children with HIV.


Hello. Today, I am with you to discuss the best possible HIV treatment strategy for all children with HIV at NIDA in this county. First up, I want to remind you that our research was conducted in early 2000 in a county that has a much greater HIV-positive population than most. It is the only county north of the Mississippi river in the U.S., has about 10,000 children with HIV. Approximately half of that population is also black. Another half of the children with HIV live in states with strong HIV policies, like Mississippi. The other half have family status. And since our study at NIDA involved injecting people into an injection site called the H么tel-Lorraine that is on the Missouri line up and on the border, we know those children were in those two states where an injection site of a different kind than the one above was approved by the state. They were able to get treatment there, even though they were not infected with the virus. And in fact, because of the recent spike in children with HIV being released to this county, NIDA was able to close the needle exchange program. Because of the recent spike in that kind of infection rate, we can finally say that the needle exchange program at the H么tel-Lorraine could not work if those kids were treated in the state with needle exchanges. We believe that our best opportunity is to take care of the children who were in that area and let them come to NIDA to receive treatment instead. We know that their response is to have a new injection site approved. The best chance we have is to send them to a new drug shop or to a new facility that has an injection site at the H么tel-Lorraine that can be administered in New Jersey. The best treatment option at that drug store is to put them into new individuals to inject with and inject with while

You should be aware that some children are living with HIV, and most of them are HIV-positive. In the most recent National HIV Survey in the same county of New Jersey, 50% of American people believe that the virus is spread through one household alone, which is extremely poor in our society at large.
Dr. Olin, MD and NCT-E, Inc.

Dr. David Olin of NIDA testified before Congress yesterday (Jan. 27) about the need for further research into ways to treat kids with HIV, and he called for the government to develop new strategies for preventing drug use among children with HIV.


Hello. Today, I am with you to discuss the best possible HIV treatment strategy for all children with HIV at NIDA in this county. First up, I want to remind you that our research was conducted in early 2000 in a county that has a much greater HIV-positive population than most. It is the only county north of the Mississippi river in the U.S., has about 10,000 children with HIV. Approximately half of that population is also black. Another half of the children with HIV live in states with strong HIV policies, like Mississippi. The other half have family status. And since our study at NIDA involved injecting people into an injection site called the H么tel-Lorraine that is on the Missouri line up and on the border, we know those children were in those two states where an injection site of a different kind than the one above was approved by the state. They were able to get treatment there, even though they were not infected with the virus. And in fact, because of the recent spike in children with HIV being released to this county, NIDA was able to close the needle exchange program. Because of the recent spike in that kind of infection rate, we can finally say that the needle exchange program at the H么tel-Lorraine could not work if those kids were treated in the state with needle exchanges. We believe that our best opportunity is to take care of the children who were in that area and let them come to NIDA to receive treatment instead. We know that their response is to have a new injection site approved. The best chance we have is to send them to a new drug shop or to a new facility that has an injection site at the H么tel-Lorraine that can be administered in New Jersey. The best treatment option at that drug store is to put them into new individuals to inject with and inject with while

Some of the officers feel that if you were not a drug user going into prison, you are certainly entering into an environment that will promote the use of drugs. Some start using drugs because they are bored or just want to fit in with

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Prison System And Youthful Drug Dealers. (October 3, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/prison-system-and-youthful-drug-dealers-essay/