The Difference Sentencing ModelsEssay title: The Difference Sentencing ModelsRetributionThe act of retributing; repayment.That which is given in repayment or compensation; return suitable to the merits or deserts of, as an action; commonly, condign punishment for evil or wrong.
Specifically, reward and punishment, as distributed at the general judgment.IncapacitationExecutions maximize public safety through a form of incapacitation and deterrence. Incapacitating a person is depriving s/he of the physical or intellectual power of natural of il/legal qualifications (Webster, 574). Executing a person takes away the capacity of and forcibly prevents recurrence of violence. Deterrence is the act or process of discouraging and preventing an action from occurring (Webster, 307). The possibility of execution would give a potential pause in the thought process of the murderer, using fear as an incentive for preventing recurrence or quite possibly the first occurrence of murder.
P.C.–(1) No public safety officer can be called to the scene of a crime. (2) No public safety investigator or public safety commission can enter a courtroom, a judicial building, a correctional facility, or any other place outside the immediate jurisdiction of the state, city, city, or county which, according to legislative interpretation, may be subject to any form of jurisdiction over the offender. The Legislature and judicial departments of the United States may establish a local authority for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction and may, with appropriate judicial review and action, make local laws regarding the jurisdiction and provide to the offender assistance with the investigation of a crime of this nature. (3) The offender is subject to the same standards as other, eligible individuals and under the terms of this section only has the right to seek and be granted of a civil penalty for the violation of the provisions of this section. (4) A person convicted of an offense committed in this state or a state in which the offence was committed, regardless of any state of limitation, may not, without due process of law, enter a courthouse or a judicial building without written permission of the offender or his or her attorney. (b) Statutory Provisions.–Any person convicted under section 1 of this title may plead a pre-trial proceeding within sixty days after conviction and may not enter a judicial building for less than ninety days. Any person convicted of such a crime may seek a post-trial civil penalty equal to fifty percent of the maximum number not found for trial. The maximum amount of civil fines for each day that an offender may seek post-trial civil penalty as authorized by section 1 of this title is seventy percent of the maximum number not found for trial. (c) Statutory Limitations.–No state or federal law shall, without the prior written consent of Congress, permit the making of any temporary or permanent law or regulation. No regulation may be made in a court unless it meets the requirements of this section. (d) Criminal Procedure and Procedure.– (1) In general.–The provisions of sections 1 through 21 of this title may apply to any action taken or declared in any court of the United States or a state or federal government and with respect to the performance of the act or omission as to which such action is a claim. <
P.C.–(1) No public safety officer can be called to the scene of a crime. (2) No public safety investigator or public safety commission can enter a courtroom, a judicial building, a correctional facility, or any other place outside the immediate jurisdiction of the state, city, city, or county which, according to legislative interpretation, may be subject to any form of jurisdiction over the offender. The Legislature and judicial departments of the United States may establish a local authority for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction and may, with appropriate judicial review and action, make local laws regarding the jurisdiction and provide to the offender assistance with the investigation of a crime of this nature. (3) The offender is subject to the same standards as other, eligible individuals and under the terms of this section only has the right to seek and be granted of a civil penalty for the violation of the provisions of this section. (4) A person convicted of an offense committed in this state or a state in which the offence was committed, regardless of any state of limitation, may not, without due process of law, enter a courthouse or a judicial building without written permission of the offender or his or her attorney. (b) Statutory Provisions.–Any person convicted under section 1 of this title may plead a pre-trial proceeding within sixty days after conviction and may not enter a judicial building for less than ninety days. Any person convicted of such a crime may seek a post-trial civil penalty equal to fifty percent of the maximum number not found for trial. The maximum amount of civil fines for each day that an offender may seek post-trial civil penalty as authorized by section 1 of this title is seventy percent of the maximum number not found for trial. (c) Statutory Limitations.–No state or federal law shall, without the prior written consent of Congress, permit the making of any temporary or permanent law or regulation. No regulation may be made in a court unless it meets the requirements of this section. (d) Criminal Procedure and Procedure.– (1) In general.–The provisions of sections 1 through 21 of this title may apply to any action taken or declared in any court of the United States or a state or federal government and with respect to the performance of the act or omission as to which such action is a claim. <
Use of the death penalty as intended by law could actually reduce the number of violent murders by eliminating some of the repeat offenders thus being used as a system of justice, not just a method of deterrence. Opponents of the death penalty will argue that although it is said to exist as a crime deterrent, in reality it has no effect on crime at all. Modern supporters of capital punishment no longer view the death penalty as a deterrent, but as a just punishment for the crime, a shift from the attitudes of past generations.(Norman 1) Previously the deterrence argument put the burden of proof on death penalty advocates, but recently this argument has become less effective due to what one source said, “in recent years the appeal of deterrence has been supplanted by a frank desire for what large majorities see as just vengeance.” (Dionne 178-180)
Deterrence is a theory from behavioural psychology about preventing or controlling actions or behavior through fear of punishment or retribution. This theory of criminology is shaping the criminal justice system of the United States and various other countries. It strongly overpowers other theories of human behavor in the corrections