Hero Honda Marketing
Hero Honda Marketing
Personal Care Products Council
(Redirected from Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association)
The Personal Care Products Council (previously the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association or CTFA) is an industry group comprised of more than 600 member companies. [1] [2] Its website states: [3]
CTFA strives to ensure that the personal care products industry has the freedom to pursue creative product development and compete in a fair and responsible marketplace. CTFA represents the industrys interests at the local, state, national, and international levels, promoting voluntary industry self-regulation and reasonable governmental requirements that support the health and safety of consumers.
Contents
[hide]
1 Cosmetic Ingredient Review
2 Challenges
2.1 DEA safety concerns
2.2 Nanotech safety concerns
2.3 Campaign for Safe Cosmetics
2.4 California legislation
2.5 European regulation
2.6 Environmental Health Network
2.7 Animal rights activism
3 Public relations
4 Lobbying
4.1 Federal lobbying
4.2 State lobbying
4.3 CTFA lobbyists
5 Political action committee
6 IRS reporting
7 Programs
8 Contact info
9 SourceWatch resources
10 External links
[edit]
Cosmetic Ingredient Review
CTFA established the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) in 1976, “with support of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration and the Consumer Federation of America.” [4] CTFA funds CIR, but claims that it “assesses the safety of ingredients used in cosmetics in an unbiased, independent forum with an expert panel comprised of world-renowned physicians and scientists.” [5]
[edit]
Challenges
[edit]
DEA safety concerns
After his research found that diethanolamine, or DEA, “slows the creation of brain cells vital to memory in rodents,” the University of North Carolina nutritionist Dr. Steven Zeisel suggested that pregnant women “check shampoo and sunblock labels,” to avoid products with DEA. “Im not saying I know women will do harm. My personal choice would be to heed this warning. Why use shampoo and sunblock containing DEA until research under way is complete?” Zeisel asked. [6]
CTFAs John Bailey questioned Zeisels warning. “The exposure is, by all measures we can see, thousands or tens of thousands times lower than reported in [Zeisels] paper,” he told the Raleigh News & Observer. [7]
[edit]
Nanotech safety concerns
In mid-2006, a coalition of environmental groups asked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to regulate the use of nanoparticles in cosmetics, saying their safety had not yet been determined. Two groups, Friends of the Earth and International Center for Technology Assessment, filed a formal petition with the agency. The petition “coincided with the release of a report by the groups that highlighted the number of personal care products with nanoingredients.” The report states that nanoparticles are “used extensively in more than 116 sunscreens, cosmetics and personal care products,” according to the San Francisco Chronicle. [8]
The FDA “plans an October meeting to discuss the new kinds of nanotechnology materials being developed for use in the products it regulates, including drugs, food, cosmetics and medical devices,” reported AP. [9] The SF Chronicle reported, “Animal studies have shown that some nanoparticles can penetrate cells and tissues, move through the body and brain and cause biochemical damage. But whether cosmetics and sunscreens containing nanomaterials pose health risks remains largely unknown, pending completion of long-range studies recently begun by the FDA and other agencies.” [10]
CTFAs executive