The New England and the Chesapeake RegionsDBQ #1The New England and the Chesapeake regions were settled largely by people of the English origin, but by 1700, the two developed in opposing ways and evolved into two distinct societies of their own. The large difference in development occurred between the New England and Chesapeake regions because each group had their own specific reason for coming to the New World. The two regions differed in their cultures. The New England region revolved around religion. Their main objective was family and religious freedom. When speaking of the Chesapeake region, it was founded mainly for economic reasons. They were geared around profits. To put it simply, with different motives came different outcomes.
The following table presents the region’s different economic and social reasons for its origin. The blue line represents the relative fortunes of the various regions. When the chart is a table of economic and socio-economic statistics, the green axis shows the relative fortunes of the two regions. It is important to note, however, that these economic and social reasons do not necessarily reflect individual differences in geographical features and lifestyles. Similarly, the two regions have specific differences in their economy and social conditions. The red lines represent the two economic factors at the bottom of the economic statistics as used for purposes of this data. They vary slightly in their economic, social and political importance.
The following table presents the relative fortunes of a region’s major economic and political factors of its origins. The color is for the time period and the text has been prepared only as a sample of data for this period. The number of lines is used to illustrate the strength of the different economic and political factors of the two regions.
The New England region is based on the trade-union organization, in which individuals began to trade under its umbrella for other people’s services. Those who worked for the New England region were generally employed at a rate of only 10¢. The two regions shared common objectives: they sought to improve the lives of their citizens. While the Old World was suffering a prolonged period of war and occupation (as it did since the early 1700s), it was able to make substantial progress in securing a common culture. But after 1700, its problems began to spread through much of Europe.
The Great Lakes region began its commercial life in the early 18th century. It was a small country with little industrial activity and no organized social structure. After the 1740s, industrialization began to take place at first. But a small group of prominent businessmen such as the German-born Friedrich von Braun, William W. Stoltenberg, William Henry Bader and many others began to emerge as the leading international businessmen. Their successes have been cited as proof of the importance of the Great Lakes region and their success has been cited for the rise of a new type of European business. A long-range alliance between the United States and the two countries is gaining momentum and is expected during the next few years.
The Chesapeake region is an important trading zone for many companies that depend on the region’s trade. The trade between the regions is limited mainly by the trade between the Eastern Hemisphere and Europe. Most of those involved in manufacturing in the area have come from the United States. The Chesapeake nation is an important economic market outside of New York City, and many of its industrial, political and military industries are located throughout the Chesapeake. The economic growth of the region is characterized by a rapidly expanding economy, and much of the sector is located in large cities.
In addition to the economic factors, one of
The following table presents the region’s different economic and social reasons for its origin. The blue line represents the relative fortunes of the various regions. When the chart is a table of economic and socio-economic statistics, the green axis shows the relative fortunes of the two regions. It is important to note, however, that these economic and social reasons do not necessarily reflect individual differences in geographical features and lifestyles. Similarly, the two regions have specific differences in their economy and social conditions. The red lines represent the two economic factors at the bottom of the economic statistics as used for purposes of this data. They vary slightly in their economic, social and political importance.
The following table presents the relative fortunes of a region’s major economic and political factors of its origins. The color is for the time period and the text has been prepared only as a sample of data for this period. The number of lines is used to illustrate the strength of the different economic and political factors of the two regions.
The New England region is based on the trade-union organization, in which individuals began to trade under its umbrella for other people’s services. Those who worked for the New England region were generally employed at a rate of only 10¢. The two regions shared common objectives: they sought to improve the lives of their citizens. While the Old World was suffering a prolonged period of war and occupation (as it did since the early 1700s), it was able to make substantial progress in securing a common culture. But after 1700, its problems began to spread through much of Europe.
The Great Lakes region began its commercial life in the early 18th century. It was a small country with little industrial activity and no organized social structure. After the 1740s, industrialization began to take place at first. But a small group of prominent businessmen such as the German-born Friedrich von Braun, William W. Stoltenberg, William Henry Bader and many others began to emerge as the leading international businessmen. Their successes have been cited as proof of the importance of the Great Lakes region and their success has been cited for the rise of a new type of European business. A long-range alliance between the United States and the two countries is gaining momentum and is expected during the next few years.
The Chesapeake region is an important trading zone for many companies that depend on the region’s trade. The trade between the regions is limited mainly by the trade between the Eastern Hemisphere and Europe. Most of those involved in manufacturing in the area have come from the United States. The Chesapeake nation is an important economic market outside of New York City, and many of its industrial, political and military industries are located throughout the Chesapeake. The economic growth of the region is characterized by a rapidly expanding economy, and much of the sector is located in large cities.
In addition to the economic factors, one of
The people that settled in the New England region mostly came in families. In Document B, you see a number of people that have the same last name. Puritans, as the New England people were called, were simply looking for a new place to live, mainly to escape religious persecution. The people who came to the Chesapeake region, mostly male, came for money. In Document C, you see a number of single names meaning not many came with family. They set up plantations and made profit from tobacco, indigo and different crops of that nature. Because people came in families to New England population they grew on their own, unlike in the Chesapeake region. There were no women in Chesapeake and thats why the population in Chesapeake never flourished. The crown was continually sending people just to keep the colony alive.
In New England, they had a multiple crop economy. They planted more vegetables and foods needed to survive. You can say that because they planted vegetables people in New England had less food shortages. Chesapeake had a single crop economy: tobacco. Its bad to have a single crop economy because if something happens to that crop, like a natural disaster, then people