What Are Natural Rights? – John LockeEssay Preview: What Are Natural Rights? – John LockeReport this essayWhat are Natural Rights? A Natural Right is a universal right that everyone has all around the world. In particular, Natural Rights is a political theory that maintains that an individual enters into society with certain basic rights and that no government can deny these rights. Us as humans were born with these natural rights. Natural rights grew out of the ancient and medieval doctrines of natural law, which is the belief that people, as creatures of nature and God, should live their lives and organize their society on the basis of rules and precepts laid down by nature or God. The concept of a natural right can be contrasted with the concept of a legal right. A legal right is specifically created by the government, while a natural right is claimed even when it is not enforced by the government.
Is Private Property a Natural Right? Yes! I consider Private Property a Natural Right. Private Property plays a big role within Natural Rights. Many philosophers including Locke, Marx, and Rawls each had their position on private property. This leads to the question: What is Private Property? You can’t just give one definition because as I said before, many philosophers had different positions about private property on natural rights. If I had to define Private Property, I would say it is any property that is not public property, and may be under the control of a group or a single individual. It is like a claim to something that excludes others from having that same privilege. The one philosopher that I will talk about is John Locke. John Locke’s position on private property being a natural right is really different from that of other philosophers.
John Locke was a prominent western philosopher born in 1632. Locke was a major social contract thinker who argued that all people know what to do and why they do it therefore making sense. He said that mans natural rights are life, liberty, and property. He also says that the right to property is in fact a natural right. He believes this because outside to any government or society, you have the right to property. I agree with Locke here because you are entitled to your right of property outside of any government and society in which they have no say. Locke had a broad sense and a narrow sense of the way we use property. The broad sense is that it covers a wide range of human interest and aspirations. The narrow sense is material goods. Locke believes that property is created by the application of labor and that property
The importance of being fair and equal in society is a clear and strong case for a free government. Let’s take the example above. It was well known by the nineteenth century, for example, that slavery was a fundamental human right in Africa. But by the 1920s, many more blacks were taking advantage of the opportunities they offered at the bottom of the economic ladder. This led to the abolition of slavery entirely. Today our government, like all governments of the world, only ever wants to keep it open as “a form of slavery” where the majority of its citizens can live free with little to no involvement other than the government’s. But this is just the way it is. All of us can use a free contract and, through that contract, we will give our children rights and freedom. The problem is, what do you do if you have no legal right to take such an action? What are the rights you have that you cannot do or do not have?
The free contract, of course, is for the benefit of all of you to live the life of your heart, enjoy liberty, and not depend for your lives on others as if this is your right. However, one can’t be a slave to another until one of you can live your fullest, and the rest will die young. You cannot take other people’s property for yourself. All of these issues are clearly and unequivocally set forth to provide you with a better future than the state gives you when you don’t take a piece of your employer’s property for yourself. So instead of calling for an economic reform that brings back jobs without paying for them by taking away the right of others to choose how they work, you want a real tax cut on all of this. And if this government isn’t willing to create a fair and equal place for all citizens, then you can’t come here to pay the bill in the way some people think, and in the manner some others do.
This is not to say that everyone is entitled to the same rights and freedoms that you do. Each of us comes to the same conclusion about the rights and freedoms that people have in order to be successful. As a result, our own economic system doesn’t work for all of us. Everyone has a different perspective and a different set of preferences and beliefs; some choose to follow the government agenda for money, others will use their money wisely and other will use it wisely for personal gain. All of us are free and free to use our limited resources wisely, at least some of which are for personal gratification. There is something about capitalism that is fundamentally wrong.
And so, on the point of slavery, and on the point of human morality, what I’m about to focus on is what the people of the South are doing wrong. Our actions, at this point, are not in spite of a majority government that’s being guided by a handful of politicians. What we’re doing is taking advantage of the rights and freedoms of the black population. You know, we’re doing it through social protest, protesting on the streets, protesting in our schools to protest in our courts for their rights, protesting on our streets, that’s good enough, because that’s what we’re fighting for. That’s what we’re protecting—the right of people of all