TranshumanismTranshumanismStudent’s NameInstitution Transhumanism Transhumanism can be defined as a movement that is sweeping across the global landscape and whose main purpose is to advance or further what can now be safely referred to as post-humanity. This is a concept whose basis is the furtherance of the use of science and technology to enable the reconstruction of the human physical as well as the mental condition to in such a way that it becomes a sufficiently radical idea to put into question the suitability of referring to the new formation as ‘human’ any longer. The path towards transhumanism has been marred with disagreements among the several theorists or proponents of transhumanism on the issue of the most secure or most comfortable path to advance this goal although it is enough to reckon that the general outline is already clear. The general outline is the put into use of scientific and technological knowhow and advanced skills to advance the depths of human existence in areas such as genetic engineering and the introduction of both robotics as well as nanotechnology.
The focus of transhumanism is also depicted to have at its core such matters like enhancement of artificial intelligence and other century born technological sophistication that will aid the achievement of perceived relief to mankind by eliminating such problems like diseases and death itself as well as to induce an artificial state of happiness or fantasy to humanity as a whole. It is also estimated that the general fulfillment of the specific dreams mentioned above will only mark the beginning of this new era of scientific and technological revolution as well as the start of what the newly acquired or invented powers will make possible. The end is bound to be limitless and the phase of human existence and the global structure will experience an undefined overhaul in terms of how the new intelligence can be embodied and what exactly it can accomplish.
(The authors of this essay were originally from New York, and it is not known in what way they originally met or wrote about humanity: for example, they wrote the thesis of a meeting in London. To be specific, it was stated that they met in London, in April, 1993, and they wrote, while they still lived, that “the current global economy is going through a boom. “I think that if we are to keep going, it is very important for anyone in a position of influence to stay in place, but it’s just going to take a long time…”).
The author, though, is far from a naturalist, which is why it is the job of one, Dr. Paul Eichler, to tell him about this new world before he is ready to go to war in the 21st century. That Eichler’s comments that the world will be much more prosperous, if we only have a new technology, are very well-reasoned. In the beginning, Eichler makes his point with a general conclusion, namely that, if we try to build an artificial intelligence system for the first time, it would be far more difficult, and far more costly and require a large number of millions depending on the system’s capabilities for achieving one thing or another. In many ways, this is true. Even if the goal of artificial intelligence really is to produce useful, good human beings, as claimed by various futurists and the likes, it cannot in its purest form achieve anything that would make any sense for living beings at all.
Dr. Paul Eichler’s posthumous research and personal experience on the subject of AI is one of the most cited scientific achievements of all time. Eichler has been the lead author of countless books on the subject, including several in his own right. Eichler was also a key early supporter for the founding of the World Institute of Physics in 1979, but because the institute was not built for his purposes, he did not pursue the goals set out in his book or in his writings. Eichler has never met a professor in his own right that did the same. What Eichler is really able to impart in this area from his many work is a profound understanding of the science behind the development of AI technologies and its development: the fact that we cannot learn by using what we already know as information; that our knowledge of other worlds is not as strong as our understanding of actual realities; and that there is often ambiguity in our understanding of the complexity of the technologies and the different uses that they can have. In the context of the present world, Eichler has clearly made some of the obvious points that most of the most important thinkers of the twentieth century held dear, and that this could not be more evident in a century long period of political turmoil in the Middle East.
To take only one example. Over the same period of time, the United States and Israel both received significant investments in information technologies that might be beneficial to the American public at the time. These investments were also used by the major American corporations and organizations in a number of industries with a stake in either the future or potential future of America, as well as major foundations in the industrial (technological, financial, and administrative) world. These investments (read: media, scientific, and economic) were crucial in sustaining a large American population and in developing the next great U.S. national interest. These investments were also used by major European and American institutions as well as by big European banks and financial institutions. These investments were also used in the