Alternative Punishment For JuvenilesEssay Preview: Alternative Punishment For JuvenilesReport this essayThink some teenagers are getting out of hand these days, or heading down the wrong path? There are many different types of alternative punishment; the amount of juvenile crime would dramatically drop if any of these were more greatly enforced. The most effective way to help these teenagers and to get them started down the correct path is enforcing alternative punishment upon them. This form of punishment is sometimes also known as juvenile justice, restorative justice, and community justice (Karp, 2004). One of the most important characteristics of this punishment is “the idea of discussion, dialogue, and negotiation between the parties involved in and affected by a given crime” (Karp, 2004, ph. 2). This not only forms a connection between the offender and the victim, but also helps to determine what types of steps the offender should take to repair the harm done to the community and the victim. Involvement from the communities and the victims in safe settings almost always provide the best process to determine restorative obligations. This is why it is important to investigate the participation of all parties; how willing they are to engage in such a dialogue, and how much of an effect these discussions have on both parties. A good example of this is a particular program used in the state of Vermont in the United States. In this program, trained community volunteers serve on a panel that meets with juveniles, their parents, their victims, and probationers to come to develop a restorative agreement (Karp, 2004).
There are many different ways of enforcing alternative punishment among juveniles. These can ranger from workforce development programs; which provide job training to incarcerated juveniles in an attempt to prepare them for employment, to a more controversial program such as a military style boot camp; which subject the juvenile to rigorous physical activity, verbal abuse, and high amount of stress as an attempt to “break” them so they can be more effectively rehabilitated (Alternative, 2002). A lighter form of alternative punishment that is most common is community service (Donegan, 1996). Another harsher form of alternative punishment that has proven to be greatly effective is boarding schools (Boarding, 2003).
Workforce development programs prove to be highly effective in lowering the rate of repeat offenses. The Anne E. Casey Foundation, a charity for disadvantaged children, conducted an astonishing report in 2002. This report found that the average rate of repeat offenses in juvenile justice institutions was 50% to 70%. While on the other hand, the repeat rate for four of the fifteen workforce development programs was below 20%. Juveniles who are provided with opportunities and skills for careers are not as likely to be further involved with crime (Alternative, 2002). Executive director of the National Youth Employment Coalition, David Brown, says this. “If young people have a little money in their pockets and are productively occupied in employment activities, theyre less likely to commit delinquent acts and more likely to be productive members of society” (Alternative, 2002, ph. 4).
Some more examples of this type of soft alternative punishment are a wide array of things that one may not think would have such an impact on juveniles as they do. These include, but are not limited to, hunter safety classes, babysitting, and victim impact situation; such as an ambulance ride along, get a life program, and a jail tour. Here is a list that might help explain this well.
(Karp, 2004)Boarding Schools is an effective way of reforming juveniles. This type of punishment is often referred to as a tough love punishment also. Some people may think that boarding schools are not regulated sufficiently and/or the students are mistreated. The few incidents that might lead someone to this conclusion can not even begin to compare to the amount of juveniles that this type of reform has helped. If this means more monitoring of the schools to make sure that they are regulated sufficiently to help reform juveniles, lets do it. Isnt this something that would be well worth the time and money? Students end up at boarding schools do so because they have been unable to get the help that they need elsewhere. Some students need more strict discipline to help them to reform than others (Boarding, 2003).
Another type of tough love punishment is military style boot camps. Some may say that there is too much potential for abuse in boot camps. Studies show that participants learn more discipline and are more protected from bad influences, such as in boot camps, have a higher reform rate (Alternative, 2002). “All the national research has shown that it takes more than a kick in the pants and someone telling you to march, march, march to really change your thinking and change your behavior,” says Pamela Ward of the Texas Youth Commission, which oversees serious youth offenders (Alternative, 2002, ph. 10).
All in all, alternative punishment among juveniles needs to be increased and more greatly enforced. They also need to be taken more seriously. Harsher punishment needs to be taken into consideration more often. Curfews are believed by some to help prevent crime among juveniles (Donegan, 1996).
“I find it very hard to believe that a curfew could have any significant effect on teenagers who are selling drugs, stealing cars or carrying a gun,” says Arthur Spitzer, legal director of the ACLU in Washington, D.C. “The very thought that they would be deterred by a $500 dollar fine against their parents is laughable when these kids are facing up to 10 years in the pokey. A kid wont look at the Rolex he just stole and say, Oh, Ive got to get home. Its 11 oclock” (Donegan, 1996, ph. 8).
Even some teenagers themselves are beginning to realize how much alternative punishments need to be enforced. Many people do not realize just how much juvenile crime is increasing their community. They also do not realize the many options there are to take for decreasing the amount of juvenile crime. Some communities already have policies that are supposed to help reduce the amount, but these do not help unless they are enforced the way they should be. Tianna Hutchinsons, a sixteen year old teenager of Washington, D.C. was caught by a policeman breaking the curfew of 11 p.m. along with a friend of hers. The policemen just stated that they shouldnt be out that late and that the next time he would enforce the curfew and take them in (Donegan, 1996). Tianna herself made this statement about the incident; “Forget the curfews,” she says. “Tighten up on the bad kids. Show them they cant be arrested one morning and out on the
.
Why is the punishment for the kid of the year worse than the kid of the year if he steals a pack of cigarettes and then leaves? The problem is that they have no idea that they can afford to be fined. Police don’t know how much they will get, and many teenagers don’t care to know how much. They don’t want to know their school budget and what their school budget says if they break curfew.
And now the kid can start a new record by stealing. Police don’t allow it. But they say they have some tools at their disposal, too, like that plastic bag, the $7.50 bottle of wine, and some other supplies and equipment. And they take one look at every kid who has a record and a wallet, and they ask, “So are you able to steal a bunch of money because it’s a record as well?!?”
Police use this opportunity to get a good case from the kid who steals, they want it to be a successful case! But it is really difficult to find evidence. In a case like this, it’s hard to pick out the kids who did the stealing if they got a good, decent record, not a good record. But even where it’s not an evidence of criminality or theft, police want to tell the kid, “Hey, let’s show you that you can make money and a lot of money, and that this is something that you can do for another person,” especially if the kid steals to prove to the police they did the crime. Police often don’t want the money. They want a cash or a bag of cigarettes. They just want the kids to know that once they come away from this, that’s what they should be doing now. The law never gives that power to cops. I recently spent 3 months in court in Washington, D.C., where many kids were arrested for not knowing about the law and yet still were on the police payroll. This is what happened to young people who stole:
In one case police took my kid, after he got home from school with a bunch of money… And then later (because everyone was getting more and more scared with the story) he went back in the car and stole the whole $200 he was carrying. He only had $80.00. No one knew how to pay him for it. The kids stole the money because they took it for their parents to see. The kid’s mom took over at the time.
Then in the morning of 9 a.m. when she saw it, she didn’t let it get to her son, it went to my family house. The kid was upset so she didn’t let it drop to her son’s mom. He immediately left and wasn’t very happy around me. I spent 3 weeks in juvenile detention in Maryland just out of state. I was put under house arrest for “knowingly causing death,” for driving under the influence, for taking part in a gang activity, for getting drug charges, and for driving with children before 13 and later getting out of the country. My son got away from me.
My oldest friend was arrested shortly thereafter. She and her kid had a little bit of money to get and a lot of cigarettes, but only one had money in it, so she went to another store one day and tried the cigarette on her. Again for money. Nobody said that you could go in there in a place where people could put stuff on the counter, but I remember one time, when I was there alone, one of the guys and his kids were sitting in the back of the store talking about the tobacco