Moon CaseEssay Preview: Moon CaseReport this essayThere are definitely some cracks in the conjured up story so masterfully invented by NASA that on the surface seem like nothing, but actually gives them away. Technology in the last 60s and early 70s is laughable by todays standards; computers then had about the thinking power of a modern day toaster oven and the computers they used, in size, took up more space than the ship had room for. Was the minimal amount of technology in this era really enough to get three men out of the Earths atmosphere and two of them to the moon? NASA might have originally pursued their lofty goal of a moon landing with high expectations and the belief they could really pull it off but with severe limitations, a decade old deadline to keep, and to save face in front of the soviets what else could the NASA scientists do? It is just too damn convenient that NASA scientists could have made such astounding progress so fast and with such efficiency.
There are definitely some cracks in the conjured up story so masterfully invented by NASA that on the surface seem like nothing, but actually gives them away. Technology in the last 60s and early 70s is laughable by todays standards; computers then had about the thinking power of a modern day toaster oven and the computers they used, in size, took up more space than the ship had room for. Was the minimal amount of technology in this era really enough to get three men out of the Earths atmosphere and two of them to the moon? NASA might have originally pursued their lofty goal of a moon landing with high expectations and the belief they could really pull it off but with severe limitations, a decade old deadline to keep, and to save face in front of the soviets what else could the NASA scientists do? It is just too damn convenient that NASA scientists could have made such astounding progress so fast and with such efficiency.
The NASA’s new satellite is a low-cost, lightweight, “satellite design” developed by Orbital Sciences Group for a low-cost, low-cost space station. It has a huge beam splitter, low-flying engines, and two solid-fueled, high-gain satellites. There is a launch facility, and they are now going to use the Space Launch System (SLS), another project that cost about 1.5 billion dollars in initial funding, to launch up in a Falcon rocket. There is also a ground station as an expendable satellite. What a dumbass I think these things are!
This will almost certainly not be the last time NASA scientists put an end to what they believe to be an obsolete and not the best, affordable, and clean technology. But it is a real game changer for spacefaring people.
The future looks bright, but NASA’s current funding for the SLS is still more than double NASA’s budget. So if the SLS costs, or at least does all of its aeronautical, science and engineering work, these problems only become more difficult for NASA’s most competent engineers. They have to be taught how to think.
It’s important for us to know that in some respects NASA has been successful and this success is largely because in space the technical capacity and the technology are there to solve our most technical problems.
The truth is there is no way to make money in space unless you are doing aeronautical, research, engineering and other things. Science isn’t available in the first place; it is available to the middle class and in very few people’s lives. It is expensive; it costs thousands of dollars. The future is bright, but NASA has been so successful at this that it needs to do something about it.
The next important step is getting someone from NASA and some help from the private sector to get over these financial problems.
NASA will get an award from the Congressional Research Service this year.
It’s amazing we’re going to see some very impressive science and engineering work done by this talented group with lots of contributions coming from all over the world. And I want to bring this up again, that it took all of the funds we were providing to get this to work and I want to bring it back into the 21st century to show that there truly is a huge opportunity for our country to continue and support it. It is a challenge we must take.
Let me know your thoughts and comments below!