Kant Vs. Grotius
Join now to read essay Kant Vs. Grotius
It seems that Kant has a much more conservative view towards lying and when it is permissible. Grotius has a much more liberal, modern, and understanding view on the issue. Kant pretty much thinks that it is ones duty to speak the truth, although this moral principle is not taken unconditionally in the world today. This is a duty because it is every mans right to know the truth and lying to anyone would be taking this right away, which mortals should not have the power to do. However, if a man throws this right away, through committing evil acts that are opposed to the good of mankind, he no longer has a right to the truth and he can be lied to. Also, if a one forces another man to speak, the man has no duty to tell the truth, because the truth is not supposed to be obtained in this way. Some believe that lying does not count if it does not injure another person directly, however Kant believes that lying always hurts mankind generally, and is therefore unjust. Even if one lies to a murderer to try to prevent another mans death, the consequences might be other than expected and one might be held responsible

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Mans Right And Kant Vs. Grotius. (April 21, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/mans-right-and-kant-vs-grotius-essay/