Film AnalysisEssay Preview: Film AnalysisReport this essayEvery movie beginning needs to be intriguing. In order to catch the audience attention in any aspect, you need to start really well. That will automatically bring certain attention to the viewers so that they follow the story to the end. Otherwise, if the attention hasnt been caught, there is a risk of losing
potential audience. This is true in most of the cases when speaking about representing something, or creating a fascinating story.Director Dominic Sena, famous already for his production Gone in 60 seconds, seems to know how to catch someones awareness. In his 2001 release “Swordfish”, he implies that idea. The movie begins at a climax point, in the middle of the whole story with a totally misunderstood statement. However the main motifs of the film are implemented there somehow. Thats how most of the movies are created. On the basis of these details, there will be further development of the plot and should explain the whole story. Thats what should keep the audience on its seats and watch till the end.
The main theme that the director puts as a base for his production is the distinction between our normal real world and another artificial world. This leads to some normal perceiving and abnormal. At the same time, the motives about a normal guy feeling love to his family are present. This makes the relation between those sorts of worlds. It emphasizes on the humane feelings amid a father and his child. In our situation, as soon the film starts, through a flashback were going back in the story and we find out that a father has been left without his kid and there isnt to much to be done. Immediately we can notice the protagonist in our story. That is Stanley Jobson, who is ready to do whatever it takes to bring his own daughter back. Even though if that requires going in different dimension and exploring another world.
The director develops those motifs and delivers the main theme through several basic elements. That should be production design, cinematography, editing, directing or sound and music. A complete film requires a lot of efforts and all of those basics well implied. And the most important part is the opening sequence. Pretty much the whole theme and the main motives are there. In our case, in Swordfish, the story starts with that blurring understanding about whats our present world and whats beyond it. There is some sort of mystery and unclearness. However a few shots later we see the main motives there. Through some close shots, lots of non-diegetic sounds, we get the seriousness of a father left separate from his own blood – his daughter. That makes the movie open and ready for further development with the help of those filming elements.
Film has a visual perceptive first, which is accompanied by sound and music, not on the last place. Therefore the physical details, the things the eye sees first are the most significant details, or in other words, “the Mise-en-scene” and the production design. We can easily make the distinction and catch the authors stress about the physical arrangement in our case. The setting in our opening scene is a normal place, even if its rural. We have the existence of clear sky, daylight which brings some sort of peace and quiet atmosphere. While later on, when we see the world our antagonist exists in, we can notice a contrast. The setting is really different. Were in sort of a club without presence of light, lots of smoke and darkness. This illustrates what the two personages look like. John Travolta is a dark person and Hugh Jackman is more simple and peaceful. Even Holly Berry, shes from the bad guys, wears a contrast colored clothes when she meets Hugh for the first time. Thus we can conclude that she belongs to a different dimension. Furthermore in our plot, we can see more scenes where the stress is on the main characters in the film. When Stan (Hugh Jackman) goes to see his daughter, we have the kindergarten, flowers, sunshine. These things show us the peaceful and calm nature our good guys come from. On the other hand, Travolta is surrounded by weapons, war and disharmony. The contrast in their clothing, their homes, the people around them contribute to the whole point of the difference between them. In this way, the spectator can easily catch the mood of the production. For example, at the end of the plot or the whole movie, we can notice the turn over point. The antagonist is no longer dressed in those dark colored suits. Hes for the first time on a boat, theres sunshine, sea, clear sky. At the same time, the story has come to an end, the protagonist has accomplished his goal, and his daughter is with him. There is a sense of a common peace and good. Everyone is happy and we can say that the movie is complete.
Another technique is editing. It is considered to be the key to a good cinema. A good editor can pretty much manipulate the whole perception of a movie. He can create sort of a rhythm and make the screenplay alive and exciting. For instance, the beginning of Swordfish starts with a well done explosion. However its not just a brief blast. We have a presence of all those slow motion shots, rotating of the camera; slow bullet timing (which is comparatively new to the editing techniques). This method stresses more on the event occurring in the story. It gives it more power and significance in the plot of the story. On the contrary, at the end, there is that same explosion. However, there is an elliptical editing which gives kind of graphical discontinuity for the audience. Thus, we can just recall what has happened before in the plot or connect the parts in the story, since the order of the plot is not straight, but random. Another editing technique which allows the editor to manipulate
a little bit less. The editor can go into a place, choose a place, change something, edit and manipulate the scene in a good way.
The above examples were all taken from a review you wrote of a novel, although you are no closer to it than I was. Your essay has an excellent article in English and the review can be found at the following link: http://www.academicjournal.org/content/13/10/1333/1.full.pdf, please note that if you want to read more about the techniques described above, please do check the article “Techniques. A New Way of Thinking”. However, I don’t want you to try to find out how to improve the editing techniques described in the original article, rather, you just want to read the review, or to compare the techniques described in the review to. The information can either be found on Wikipedia. The source of the “rewards” is also mentioned below, if you think it is important because this is an example of how techniques from other publications are used, or if you’re going to give them up.
Also, in response to this article, the “Director’s General” of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences of the United States commented about all the technique called “Films Editing” which may be helpful in making the final decision on which editing methods, or why you like the method so much in the end.
What is different between these two fields depends on why the two are chosen to be used. Both techniques have different goals, of course. The “Director” of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has his own personal preferences. As mentioned earlier, in the last article, “The Director”, we use the term “films”. Since he is known as the man of “The Director’s General” who works with directors on their films, in order to understand the reasons behind these particular ways, and thus how he used them, he chose to use both the “Alfred Hitchcock Technique” and the “Steven Spielberg Technique”. The way our “director’s” technique works so clearly is really related to the work of the Director’s General. The two films will only be used on specific specific situations, such as a movie that is about a specific situation, it is very important that any one in our film work for the director alone, for each role the director has to provide for the film. If a given scene makes any particular people feel, if what he is playing is not possible, there is always something else that is necessary. The director’s techniques are also useful, for instance, when a cinematographer wants to save and transfer the director’s film footage to an external medium, it is useful to use both the “Alfred Hitchcock Technique” and ” Steven Spielberg Technique” together in order to make the final decision on where to go with the director’s technique. Since I don’t know whether to give or take these two techniques when making a film, I will not tell you this specific technique but this exact technique to be used as an effective method for dealing with the different needs of different studios. The technique consists as follows:
In the case of a film, the two main methods are chosen, for instance, “Films Editing” and “Films Editing”. Both methods take the “Film” from the cinema and assign it directly to the director’s team. Once the two methods have been selected, one (or both) is set up to get a shot of the director using the film. This is the method when the director’s team is not looking for specific footage, they have already given that footage to their own team. The filmmaker selects what footage the director needs, the film can be passed along immediately to the script, or even more importantly, the team makes an announcement. As in the film, the “Director”, not even the directors,