Investment PlanningEssay Preview: Investment PlanningReport this essayInvestment PlanningI use one year and ten months to save the first $100,000. Then, I buy one shock that is Lenovo Group (00992.HK). I choose it because the company had great strategy and good performance of last few years from news. The company also invests more money to improve and enhance its technologies. For example, Lenovo Group has just established a global strategic partnership with Juniper Networks to develop network equipment business. It can be effective to enhance its products and expand the business, such as more classes of clients, more types of electronic products and so on.
In same kind of 50 constituent stocks in Hang Seng Index in Hong Kong, I choose Tencent (00700.HK) to compare with Lenovo Group (00992.HK). (Figuare4) In price, Lenovo Group is cheaper than Tencent. Lenovo Group’s EPS is lower than Tencent’s, but Lenovo Group’s P/E ratio is better than Tencent’s. After comparison with all data of two stocks, I consider Lenovo Group’s financial strength and type of the industry of company under fundamental analysis. It can be good for its further development and future performance of service and products based on new technological products and overseas market. More people desire new technological electronic products around the world. The market demands more different kinds of electronic products. It is good for Lenovo Group for the increasing stock’s price in the future. Based on the assumption, the stock price movements are purely random. It also is a risk to be careful. Its current market price reflects true value. And it is impossible for an investor to outperform that average for the stock market as a whole over a period of time.
Therefore, I set the selling price at $10-$14 for three to five years because I think the economy is not fully recovered and the future expanded business will not perform in the report now. It will be a long period investment. During the period, I will consider world economy, the news and performance of Lenovo Group, the development of technology and so on. If any information affects the company’s future business, I will evacuate and evaluate the selling price to change my option.
The second saving of $100,000 is for the investment of bond. I choose two bonds for comparison (Figuare5), one is HSBC Holdings PLC and one is Australia Commonwealth of (Government). Australia Commonwealth of (Government) is better than HSBC Holdings PLC. It is because the Australia Commonwealth of (Government)’s coupon rate is higher than HSBC Holdings PLC’s under the same of coupon type (Fixed (Semi-Annual)) and the Australia Commonwealth of (Government)’s product risk level is lower than HSBC Holdings PLC’s. But I must consider the risk. The risk is the currency because HSBC Holdings PLC is used the United States Dollar (USD) and Australia Commonwealth of (Government) is used the Australian Dollar (AUD).
In summary, the Australian Federal Government has a cost-benefit analysis of the Australian Treasury’s benchmark policy regime to determine its effect on the Australian public. The Australian Treasury has not paid any interest on any outstanding notes, contracts, certificates and other issued securities (which have been in international circulation since November 2013). The Federal Reserve has not paid any interest on any outstanding notes, contracts, certificates or other issued securities since January 2013. The cost-benefit analysis of the Australian Treasury’s benchmark policy regime includes, based on the criteria in section 5.6 of the Australian Investment Policy Review Act, such: an estimate for the effect of the risk on the Australian private sector. The Australian private sector has been under its control since mid-2013 under the scheme.
The government cannot be expected to achieve the price or cost-benefit analysis contained in section 5.6. The fact that the Federal Reserve has not paid interest on any outstanding notes, or of any issued securities as determined under the benchmark policy regime, is of significance because, at the time of writing, we did not have a final determination on any future notes and contracts from the Federal Reserve or other government entities from which those notes, and therefore any other notes, are issued. The Australian Treasury has not yet decided on any futures contracts from the Australian Federal Reserve or other government entities from which those futures contracts are issued.
The Treasury (1) does not have a policy regime in view of the cost-benefit analysis of those benchmark policy actions that commenced with December 5, 2014 (Act s.5); however, they have the right to appeal the order or the action taken in relation to those actions, and we do not have grounds to proceed against those actions.
The Federal Reserve’s decision does not affect the Federal Reserve’s ability to pursue any such actions at the appropriate time.
The Federal Reserve Act provides that no funds were issued or sold under the scheme to anyone except those who are the subject class of persons and who have not ceased to be entitled to be a Federal Reserve Bank insured under that Act, except at the discretion of the Reserve. That rule is reflected in paragraph 22.15 above.
The Federal Reserve does not have a policy regime in view of the cost-benefit analysis of those benchmark policy actions that commenced with December 5, 2014 (Act s.5); however, they have the right to appeal any such actions at the appropriate time.
The Federal Reserve’s decision did not affect the Federal Reserve’s ability to pursue any such actions at the appropriate time.
If any decisions are not appealed in the Federal Reserve’s favour, then, on appeal, this order applies to the Federal Reserve where (a) the Federal Reserve intends to proceed with