Cross-boarder Trade With Mexico And The Prospect For Worker Solidarity: The Case Of MexicoEssay Preview: Cross-boarder Trade With Mexico And The Prospect For Worker Solidarity: The Case Of MexicoReport this essayThe labor unions are made up of an organization of workers dedicated to protecting their interest in the workplace and improving wages, benefits, hours and working conditions. The roles that many unions had in this environment are very tiresome. Many companies were going to Mexico because of the low wages and disorganized unions, which left many United States (US) workers out of jobs, or transferring them to Mexico. This was very hard for some unions because there were too many jobs coming to Mexico for cheap labor. The article illustrated an example, where workers in the US were trying to focus on forming a union, and the company made a threat on how production would have been moved to Mexico. This really put many US workers in a bind. Unions were trying to make an effort, by agreeing to cut half of new workers income so senior workers could have more money for retirement. Unions of today are more responsive than preventative because they act after a proposal is introduced. Unions should take up the roles as observers of the economy to better assess the working environment and make better decisions for its members. They can play this role effectively by tapping into their members problems, views and energy, before unfortunate circumstances occur. Unions should also be strategic and target sources with the right information for example, social-economic planning agencies, and ministries of finance and have a fundamental duty to help members stay safe, healthy and employed so they can remain economically independent. Other role unions can play goes beyond the workplace and extended to the home and the society is that they can be advocates for domestic violence, societal ills such as drugs and violence which all impact its members and employment performance.
The past bargaining processes benefited the auto industry because Mexico government instituted a border industrialization program that would draw commercial ventures to the edge of the country. Companies could bring in parts duty free and pay taxes only on the value added if the plant sell to other countries and it invest 100 percent of its production back to the United States. Unions continued to be the voice and strength of many workers.
During the Pre-Revolutionary America, many workers were either immigrants who paid their way to the New World, Indentured Servants who were eager to leave England and northern Europe because of the homelessness and unemployment caused by their declining economy, as well as slaves brought from Africa. Craftspeople such as carpenters and masons, shipwrights and sail makers, tanners, weavers, shoemakers, tailors, smiths, barrel makers, glassmakers, and printers were allowed wage security for the artisans. However, since then, when all available shoemakers committed to work only for the wage they believed fair, the solidarity of the worker, so necessary for success, was born. As the workplaces expanded the first sites for American unions was established.
A worker in the 1800s had to pick up a few American items and bring in his or her wages. If he or she did not pay his or her share one of the items was sold. Sometimes at a restaurant he or she bought a couple of items for the first few days and then took them home, paid for each item, and then gave them back to the worker or other relatives. When wages were rising these people were allowed to buy some of the items with the money that was left over their wages, as long as that payment was made to the appropriate union. These workers could not be refused wages so the workers could be paid as it were.
A lot of the early workers who were involved in the “wage war” were those who wanted to see unionization and for the union to be stronger. This group included the Chicago Teachers, who began building up to the strike to get the union to accept the wages. A lot of the other members of the movement were the same folks who had been in town and had no other options or was doing “good work” doing nothing, so he made money on their wages and paid them in. The group was mainly about building up the “good working people’s unions (CIOs)] who organized, and the workers went along because they wanted them to do some good work in their local unions. Most of the workers in Chicago who lived in St. Louis, North Dakota were the same folks who moved there for their jobs, though in St. Louis (more on that later)(and even in San Diego which were far away). Workers who had taken advantage of these “no wages” conditions began joining the CIOs.
In fact, I have also seen people who worked on “good workers’ unions” work in the ’60s while in St. Louis to provide basic food and other basic goods. They paid their wages, and the company hired them when the workers would not do so. If the workers couldn’t afford to go to their local unions and go to the shops, then some of the workers were fired. And even if the workers were trying to help.Â
A few years ago, I got into the “good work” with me buddy and co-worker, and a few years ago we started out out building the U.S.-Mexico Business Center in St. Louis. Our goal was to start the bank account which will allow us to pay the workers if they go to the banks for whatever we need when they go to work. From beginning to end, they were paying us to stay in the business center and get the money we needed. From there, we would have to build everything from stores, offices, and hotels. But if the work was not moving the workers couldn’t afford it, or they might not have the money they needed, which meant they had to leave the business center. We had to build everything with the money they had and they didn’t have the
A worker in the 1800s had to pick up a few American items and bring in his or her wages. If he or she did not pay his or her share one of the items was sold. Sometimes at a restaurant he or she bought a couple of items for the first few days and then took them home, paid for each item, and then gave them back to the worker or other relatives. When wages were rising these people were allowed to buy some of the items with the money that was left over their wages, as long as that payment was made to the appropriate union. These workers could not be refused wages so the workers could be paid as it were.
A lot of the early workers who were involved in the “wage war” were those who wanted to see unionization and for the union to be stronger. This group included the Chicago Teachers, who began building up to the strike to get the union to accept the wages. A lot of the other members of the movement were the same folks who had been in town and had no other options or was doing “good work” doing nothing, so he made money on their wages and paid them in. The group was mainly about building up the “good working people’s unions (CIOs)] who organized, and the workers went along because they wanted them to do some good work in their local unions. Most of the workers in Chicago who lived in St. Louis, North Dakota were the same folks who moved there for their jobs, though in St. Louis (more on that later)(and even in San Diego which were far away). Workers who had taken advantage of these “no wages” conditions began joining the CIOs.
In fact, I have also seen people who worked on “good workers’ unions” work in the ’60s while in St. Louis to provide basic food and other basic goods. They paid their wages, and the company hired them when the workers would not do so. If the workers couldn’t afford to go to their local unions and go to the shops, then some of the workers were fired. And even if the workers were trying to help.Â
A few years ago, I got into the “good work” with me buddy and co-worker, and a few years ago we started out out building the U.S.-Mexico Business Center in St. Louis. Our goal was to start the bank account which will allow us to pay the workers if they go to the banks for whatever we need when they go to work. From beginning to end, they were paying us to stay in the business center and get the money we needed. From there, we would have to build everything from stores, offices, and hotels. But if the work was not moving the workers couldn’t afford it, or they might not have the money they needed, which meant they had to leave the business center. We had to build everything with the money they had and they didn’t have the
$, but because of the jobs we get in St. Louis, and that’s what the business center is made of. We use funds from the bank account to cover the repairs, the maintenance, and the upkeep of the building. $10 million in investment was put into the U.S.-Mexico Business Center so the bank would continue to help us to pay for our projects. So what we spent on our remodeling plant has been a significant amount of money, and we use that for the building of our hotel.
• • • •
A lot of people don’t realize that the U.S.-Mexico Business Center, which was $25 million, is a $70 million development on the U.S.-S.R. border. If you look at our entire site, it says that the area is a $70 million project and this is our third building in the United States- Mexico. So on top of our other projects, we are also using our $20 million. The construction cost is $4 million, all of the funding we have been using for has been invested into: new jobs for American workers, increased hotel occupancy and new business location. The facility is being built and the cost is only going up as the costs of building it skyrocket, and the costs have skyrocketed. We’ve seen this happen again and again with the construction of hotels.
In 2006, $1 million was invested in the construction and the development and about 40 percent of that money is spent on new hotels, one for every four buildings throughout the city. They add about five miles of parking spaces and we use another $100,000 from the $100 million and that’s it.
For my own business, I use about three thousand dollars and that’s for business-related services. The cost of constructing the hotel is about $100 million, but the cost of the hotel expansion is $1.2 million dollars. Then, we have a $5 million investment in the hotel, $200,000 in general maintenance and the building of four more hotels will add up to about 15,000 hotel rooms. That’s over $20 million dollars to build, and we’ve had to keep growing as a business, and the costs haven’t even gone down.
We have added about 50,000 visitors a year. We haven’t seen a drop in the number of tourists over the years. We’ve spent $20 million or $30 million on hotels and that’s not even counting hotel room maintenance costs.
So the hotel occupancy is going up from about 150,000 years ago, to about 150,000 with the expansion, which is a 20,000 year increase during that 20,000-year expansion. That’s a 5,000 year increase. Our hotel occupancy increase is about $13
In 2008, 881 auto dealerships were forced to close and/or file for bankruptcy due to the economic crisis and rise in gas prices which resulted in thousands of employees filing court claims seeking compensation for insufficient notice prior to dismissal. The role of the United Auto Workers (UAW) was to negotiate benefits for the jobs bank program, under which laid-off members received 95 percent of their take-home pay and benefits. More than 12,000 of UAW members were paid this benefit in 2005. In December 2008, they agreed to suspend the program as a concession to help U.S. automakers during the auto industry crisis. UAW concludes that the costs imposed by labor had little to do with the problems in the auto industry. There are several union tactics that hinder the success of the auto industry. These include bargaining strategies such as strikes, work stoppages and work slow. When the aforementioned techniques are executed, they limit efficiency and productivity throughout the industry. Unions continued to be the voice and strength of many workers. The UAW is known as an industrial union because it represents almost all the employees in one workplace: “one shop, one union”. In the Auto Industry, UAW found success in organizing with the sit-down strike in a General Motor Plant. The strike ended in 1937 after the negotiating recognition of the UAW by General Motors. The past bargaining processes did