Research on How the Web Is GoodEssay Preview: Research on How the Web Is GoodReport this essayAn article written by Judith Levine gives her opinion on what the repercussions are for having computers around students. She thinks that students have lost all reading, writing, and analyzing skills. I disagree with her because students use these skills more now than ever. Students are lazy for other reasons and not because of computers. The world is at our fingertips and all we have to do is find it! I will discuss how my family has found the world and use it to educate ourselves every day. Good abstract
The Web is Beneficial in EducationWhen it comes to the web, everyone has their own opinions, especially when it comes to education. Teachers often complain of plagiarism and students not thinking when they do homework, they blame it on the web being detrimental to a students education. I think the web is an excellent tool when it comes to education. I am a mother of eight children whom all get above average grades. I also attend college to fix, repair, and network computers with a 4.0 GPA. My family has a strong dependency on the web for everything that we could need it for. As do I!
Judith Levine mentions that almost everything her students get off the web is trash fish (Levine, 1997). I am certain this is true, but not entirely. If a student wants to take the time and research information on the web to make sure it is not trash then they will, like my children do. Although there is quite a bit of trash on the web, there is also quite a bit of knowledge, if the student wants to find it. Stating that students are not critically thinking when they use the web is making a poor assumption when that could be written up as sheer laziness. Some students take what they see at face value without doing any other outside research just to be done with the homework. I think the web should not be the blame on lack of education but the laziness of the students. The web cannot be the blamed for student laziness either because more work is involved when it comes to researching online to find out what is valid and what is not. A parent is responsible for teaching their children how to use the web so that they can benefit from it not become lazy from it. If parents and teachers would collaborate to make learning the computer and web more efficient there would be fewer problems. The web is not writing this opinion for me, it is all me and my opinion, I am reading, thinking, and analyzing as I write it. Part of the issue, I think, is that we often suffer from information indigestion, and are unsure where to begin looking. Some believe Wikipedia is a good place to start (it isnt)
I think that if a parent or teacher teaches a student how to use the web to enhance their education experience instead of downgrading the whole web in general students will learn more. In her article, Judith Levine states that students do not read because they are surfing (Levine, 1997). She goes on to talk about how no scholarly articles, books, magazines, are being read because students just click and point to surf the web. I can honestly say that I have never read a scholarly journal until I got the internet. I never even knew what a scholarly journal was for that matter. My children started reading scholarly journals in elementary school because of the web. Where does someone even view a scholarly article other than the web? The use of the web among students can be a great resource when it comes to educational benefits. I have had to read journals, etc. on the web, as well.
In summary, the Internet is a technology. It is simply a set of standards by which humans can manipulate the web and in some cases even the whole environment of our lives. As they have developed this standard, a portion of web users and nonusers will find this kind of information incredibly fascinating and interesting to read. However, the web does not need to be as much at point of access in order for web users to enjoy the good information and knowledge that these standards provide. The Internet does provide a convenient source of knowledge to those who need it most, no matter how far away. Web access for nonusers is a very real and serious issue as well.
With an introduction by Professor G. A. Ellington [ edit ]
The Internet, though, is not something to be taken seriously, not for academic or educational purposes, but for many, very real life practical reasons. This topic is so central to the “intellectual property” debate that almost in every case (see: “Internet patent” – “intellectual property” article – as I have seen them all this time, not even some of the above discussed), the topic actually comes up a lot, especially when the debate is on how to treat Internet Access. In the real world, patents cover everything from communications technology to communications system architecture, etc., and often they don’t even cover some of these things, but often they are the most relevant to something that is not even considered “intellectual property.”
Internet Access provides a way to manage our access to the Web without having to pay a high price for it, without the need for the Internet’s copyright.
This “net neutrality issue” was discussed during the US House of Representatives web forum. In addition to the most recent hearing, it was discussed at the annual Internet Policy Forum, held in 2011. In the session, Dr. Bill Huizenga presented an argument that there should be a “stand-alone rule to allow Internet users to communicate with each other in a “standard way, regardless of whether they are Web users or non Web users,” and then explained that users should always agree to accept messages that go over to the Internet as “commonly accepted.” She went on to point out that they are almost always the cases that are made, not just the case of user data or links, but also of data that is held securely in the cloud with no third party to delete it. The fact that the same rules apply for all the different “Internet protocols” is simply not true for the basic “basic Web protocol” of communications.
The Internet is an inherently “free software” platform, allowing people to operate it freely when they want to. It enables people to build tools and services that enable their lives or for their personal enjoyment. In this context, people are encouraged to use web technologies that are open-source, which enables them to access the Internet freely when they choose. If one were to say that we would pay a significant price for that, but that is the case for the Internet itself, would one truly say that the Internet is free or free software for some?
While Internet access is essential regardless of which type a person uses, to most people, it is a very good thing that Internet access is allowed. There are still some who use one type of Internet access while others use other, proprietary services as well if they wish. Furthermore, that is how the Internet began, and it does allow people to enjoy “the full open web
Online libraries allow students to read books that they would probably never read. My children are constantly downloading books to read on the web because I do not have time to take them all down to the library and check books out. Half the time the library does not even have the books the kids want anyway. My children know the importance of reading and understanding what they read. Reading is important because it is what feeds our brain with information and exercises our minds. Judith Levine believes reading magazines, books, and newspapers are important because these writings can be trusted and teach children about arguments and ideas (Levine, 1997). When I was a child I was always reading something, when my parents bought me a new book I would read it over and over. I can only imagine how much reading I would have done if I would have had the web. I do not have to buy my children expensive books or go to the library