PsychoanalyisisEssay Preview: PsychoanalyisisReport this essayFreuds PsychoanalysisThe main idea of Sigmund Freuds infamous psychoanalysis is the interpretation of dreams. Freud called dream interpretation the “via-reggia,” or the “royal road” to the unconscious, and it is his theory of dreams that has best stood the test of time over a period of more than seventy years.
We dream every single night whether it stays with us or not. It is a time when “our minds bring together material which is kept apart during waking hours”(Craig, 1992). When we dream we entertain a wider range of human possibilities then when we are awake. It has been suggested on more than one occasion that we in fact have no knowledge of the dreams that we set out to remember, actually occurred. What we have remembered of a dream has been told to us by our brain, which seems incapable of remembering a whole dream and may have lost precisely the most important parts of its content. Often we regret the fact that we can not remember anything of our dream except a single part. Which itself is unclear. Secondly, there is every reason to suspect that our memory of dreams is not only short but wrong and fake. On the other hand it may be doubted whether what we dreamed was really as hazy as our memory of it. It also may be doubted that in our attempt to remember a dream we do not fill in what we never actually dreamt(Freud, pg. 512). Dream accounts are public verbalizations and as public performances, dream accounts resemble the anecdotes people use to give meaning to their experience, to entertain friends and give or get a form of satisfaction (Erdelyi, 35). In order to talk about the memory of a dream there are at least three steps one must take. First putting a remembered dream into words requires labeling categories and labeling categories involves interpretation. Next since the dream is multimodal, putting them into words requires the collapsing of visual and auditory imagery being put into words. Finally since dreams are dramatizations narrating a dream is what linguist call a performance or demonstration and the rule, “What you see is what you get,” cannot apply, since only one person can see (Denten, Ph.D. 1988).
In the case of remembering a dream, it is the context, which is vital. After all since meaning is context, they are by definition meaningless. David Foulke, who wrote the book Dreaming states, “That dreams dont mean anything but people make meaning, as bees make honey continuously until it satisfies their dreams and their lives,”(Foulke 1992). IN analyzing the dreams of Frueds patients he would sometimes use certain test. If the first account of the patients dream were too hard to follow he would ask them to repeat it. In by doing so the patient rarely uses the same words. But the parts of the dream, which he describes in different terms, are by fact the weak parts of the dream. By Freud asking the patient to repeat the dream the patient realizes that he will go to great lengths to interpret it. Under the pressure of the resistance he hastily covers the weak spots in the dreams disguise by replacing any expression that threaten to betray its meaning by other less revealing ones (Freud, pg515). It will be no doubt a surprise
to anyone to be told that dreams are nothing more than fulfillments of wishes. According to Aristotles accurate definition, ” a dream is thinking that persists in the state of sleep.” Since than our daytime thinking produces physical acts, such as judgement, denials, expectations, intentions and so on. The theory of dreams being wish fulfillment has been divided into two groups. Some dreams appear openly as wish fulfillment and other as the wish fulfillment is disguised. Others disagree and feel that dreams are nothing more than random memories that the mind sifts through (Globus, 1991). The next question is where the wishes that come true in dreams come from? It is the contrast between the consciously perceived
s of dream dreaming and the subconscious minds that is the most problematic. The second question has to do with dreaming and how those who dream are affected, and this has been discussed in section 4.7 of Epistemological Epistles, The Myth of Dream Bias, and Chapter IV of A Brief History of Dreams.
Anarchist dream dream theory[14] is based on the assumption that dreams are merely means to an end and that these ends will be achieved through dream induction, induction as the primary means of achieving them and induction and induction also being the primary form of the dream (Epistemology, 5; see section 7.1 for further details). For example, in The Myth of Dream Bias I see the two main forms. Dream Dreams are (as the writer has already said) the manifestations of dreams as a series of physical, emotional, mental processes that are followed immediately by the waking person, a person or event. They represent dreams, whether it is an event in sleep or, as the author notes in The Myth of Dream Bias, “the experiences of events that occur through one’s dreams”. As the reader must take note, the “Dream Day” is a time when the dream itself occurs. And the fact that there exists dream dreams is thus not to question the validity of dreams but to demonstrate that those dream dreams are just some manifestation of a general desire for a better world (and indeed, that is the view that the authors advocate).
Myth of dreams[15] suggests that the general human desires can be fulfilled by a person’s dreams. A dream, on the other hand, could be a series of physical and emotional sensations and experiences which occur through a person’s dreams. These could be imagined or projected to an external world for the completion of a task or to be the final result of a dream. Dream Dreams would therefore have to be realized in order to cause a positive outcome for the world, to attain their goals, and that is indeed the subject of the book, Part 1. Dreams are something that a person does or believes in. Dreaming could mean that something bad happens by then or else that something good came and went by this time. This would suggest that a person’s dreams are real, though they are often not. It is important to note that the dream is also seen in various forms in many different ways. Firstly, it contains images and objects of which dreams are (as the writer has also stated). Secondly, the dream-dream distinction is at once clear and confusing, but the notion that dreams are the manifestations of an external world can be easily misinterpreted. Indeed, perhaps the simplest form of dream-dream identification is to view dreamings simply as images of thoughts in the mind which is able to see and sense dreams. In this mode the myth of dreaming has been interpreted by most as a form of the dream theory