Business Process ReenginerringEssay Preview: Business Process ReenginerringReport this essayRunning head: BPR AND ITBusiness Process Engineeringand theImportance of Information TechnologyJane DoeNobodys UniversityAbstractThis paper is written to show how information technology is not the most influential component of Business Process Reengineering. Contrary to what some business leaders may think, IT is not always the main factor in a firms restructuring of its processes. After reviewing five selected journals and articles on BPR, I will show how IT is not the most significant part of a business restructuring of its processes to obtain its organizational goals.
IntroductionDoes Information Technology (IT) play a leading role in Business Process Reengineering (BPR)? Many executives and business managers have believed that IT was the driving force of the growing phenomenon of the restructuring of businesses processes today. If it is, then why is it that some firms are successful while others fail? Numerous studies have been conducted to compare the restructuring of businesses worldwide to find out the similarities and differences in their reengineering projects.
What exactly is BPR? There are many definitions, but I believe that Hammer and Champy (1993) defines it best. “BPR is the fundamental rethinking and radical redesign of business processes to achieve dramatic improvements in critical contemporary measurements of performance, such as cost, quality, service, and speed.” My personal definition of BPR is the realignment of business processes to better achieve success. On the other hand, ____ gives a specific definition saying: BPR is the radical change a firm makes to reorganize its business processes to better utilize information technology to achieve the organizations strategic goals. This statement is not true. Businesses do not have to revamp daily processes just to better utilize IT in order to achieve long term goals.
1
Many people argue that BPR is designed as a way for companies to avoid or modify their business processes in order to create new “value propositions.” Of course, BPR in its true context does not allow teams of engineers to change every bit of how one program interacts with another process. And while this can be true on many aspects of the business, many in industry still think it’s not really relevant to this subject. For example the “performance” in the “business” space in this post will not change due to BPR. You’ll have to change how your business thinks about systems, code, or software (or more simply, any of the things you use to run one system, then how does it interact in a “service” with other systems? * ) The change you want most important is the change you’re willing to face – the changes that make things work out. Even your personal goal on this subject can change based on a number of things, including, but not limited to: ____________ The customer will take a different mindset and change their beliefs – this attitude or view of the market that I’m suggesting you may be holding? There is also the new technology, so the customer could experience something new this way, or have a different sense about your company and its future? – The new team will make more mistakes every time and not only has the wrong expectations. There will be different learning opportunities, but for the most part both new projects and existing ones are much more successful in the long run. As the business processes evolve – or are less or no longer integrated – BPR can add value to people’s lives and lives to other entities in their lives – as will your salary or future income. In other words any new work, product, or service you’re developing will have some form of BPR in it, as will the time spent designing those systems. In a similar way, the more time you use those things the less time you spend in other areas of your business. For instance: your personal goals are important, and you value them more. You are probably thinking about making $$$ and buying a car, but there is no way the company will ever have $$$$$ of value to your life until now. Similarly, if the new company doesn’t have $$$$, then you’re just looking to make it $$$ again. To improve these goals, I don’t want to talk about business processes in such simplistic terms that could be completely misleading, but here’s a quick list of things you need to consider when you’re trying to design things as part of your personal goals and your business goals: 1. The change you want is the next best thing to your personal journey. It doesn’t have to be a whole new journey. This is not always true.
2. The change you want means you want to do things differently – it’s easier to think better on the job than to change your mind.
3. You want a team to be more effective. If you want 100x more people working and more productive,
Sustainable business decisions should not take too long:
* The world has a few new ways of doing things. This involves many different processes and forms of business transformation, the ability to create a profitable business, and the ability to innovate to improve things. It is a simple and effective way to improve results, reduce costs and deliver more benefits. The real goal is to produce results that align with our evolving business cycles and to have no matter how hard a change is, and that we can use this knowledge to be better organized and more sustainable. It is also an effective way to avoid losing the best practices because they are not yet the best policy. It is a very good way to make business decisions that are fair and productive, so that we can better realize our goals. What we need to do is re-take that time to understand what is necessary and not only what we need to do to make a better business. We may find the best business decision-making has been made with time, on paper. We may not win. But we are doing what is right. We may be surprised when, after a couple more years, we win our business.
* The ability to create the right time to change the business cycles is a key part of doing sustainability, and the process must stop immediately. This goal can be achieved if we know how to improve the efficiency of the processes, processes, processes, processes. However, it must stop at the root of making changes in our business, whether that is changing the design and design of services within the organization, how we perform our internal processes in conjunction with other components within the organization, and those aspects of corporate governance that are already at the top of my list.
* It is important for any policy to reflect the vision, vision, and understanding of the stakeholders. We need to take action where it is that we do that. Because we need the right time to engage with stakeholders, we need to set and implement plans to improve processes, processes, processes, processes, processes. A business with strong business cycles needs to be able to communicate and share information with its stakeholders, but not have a rigid system and a system that tries to control all aspects of the business. I have tried changing the way we evaluate and report a business. Our focus should be on implementing the plan to increase profitability and reduce cost. The best way to accomplish this is to make it easier for stakeholders to understand what has taken place in our business, and to learn about why the business decisions they make have taken them into alignment with our business cycles. Once we have agreed on a plan, we no longer have to pay the expenses and the costs of the change. Rather, we have to be open and honest by discussing, and meeting, important business decisions using real examples from the business life and from time to time as well. My proposal would be to focus on the goals, actions, and practices now and in the future, as well as where and when we look to bring back the change that has taken place in our business cycle.
* Many of the business cycles need to be changed before we
Sustainable business decisions should not take too long:
* The world has a few new ways of doing things. This involves many different processes and forms of business transformation, the ability to create a profitable business, and the ability to innovate to improve things. It is a simple and effective way to improve results, reduce costs and deliver more benefits. The real goal is to produce results that align with our evolving business cycles and to have no matter how hard a change is, and that we can use this knowledge to be better organized and more sustainable. It is also an effective way to avoid losing the best practices because they are not yet the best policy. It is a very good way to make business decisions that are fair and productive, so that we can better realize our goals. What we need to do is re-take that time to understand what is necessary and not only what we need to do to make a better business. We may find the best business decision-making has been made with time, on paper. We may not win. But we are doing what is right. We may be surprised when, after a couple more years, we win our business.
* The ability to create the right time to change the business cycles is a key part of doing sustainability, and the process must stop immediately. This goal can be achieved if we know how to improve the efficiency of the processes, processes, processes, processes. However, it must stop at the root of making changes in our business, whether that is changing the design and design of services within the organization, how we perform our internal processes in conjunction with other components within the organization, and those aspects of corporate governance that are already at the top of my list.
* It is important for any policy to reflect the vision, vision, and understanding of the stakeholders. We need to take action where it is that we do that. Because we need the right time to engage with stakeholders, we need to set and implement plans to improve processes, processes, processes, processes, processes. A business with strong business cycles needs to be able to communicate and share information with its stakeholders, but not have a rigid system and a system that tries to control all aspects of the business. I have tried changing the way we evaluate and report a business. Our focus should be on implementing the plan to increase profitability and reduce cost. The best way to accomplish this is to make it easier for stakeholders to understand what has taken place in our business, and to learn about why the business decisions they make have taken them into alignment with our business cycles. Once we have agreed on a plan, we no longer have to pay the expenses and the costs of the change. Rather, we have to be open and honest by discussing, and meeting, important business decisions using real examples from the business life and from time to time as well. My proposal would be to focus on the goals, actions, and practices now and in the future, as well as where and when we look to bring back the change that has taken place in our business cycle.
* Many of the business cycles need to be changed before we
Sustainable business decisions should not take too long:
* The world has a few new ways of doing things. This involves many different processes and forms of business transformation, the ability to create a profitable business, and the ability to innovate to improve things. It is a simple and effective way to improve results, reduce costs and deliver more benefits. The real goal is to produce results that align with our evolving business cycles and to have no matter how hard a change is, and that we can use this knowledge to be better organized and more sustainable. It is also an effective way to avoid losing the best practices because they are not yet the best policy. It is a very good way to make business decisions that are fair and productive, so that we can better realize our goals. What we need to do is re-take that time to understand what is necessary and not only what we need to do to make a better business. We may find the best business decision-making has been made with time, on paper. We may not win. But we are doing what is right. We may be surprised when, after a couple more years, we win our business.
* The ability to create the right time to change the business cycles is a key part of doing sustainability, and the process must stop immediately. This goal can be achieved if we know how to improve the efficiency of the processes, processes, processes, processes. However, it must stop at the root of making changes in our business, whether that is changing the design and design of services within the organization, how we perform our internal processes in conjunction with other components within the organization, and those aspects of corporate governance that are already at the top of my list.
* It is important for any policy to reflect the vision, vision, and understanding of the stakeholders. We need to take action where it is that we do that. Because we need the right time to engage with stakeholders, we need to set and implement plans to improve processes, processes, processes, processes, processes. A business with strong business cycles needs to be able to communicate and share information with its stakeholders, but not have a rigid system and a system that tries to control all aspects of the business. I have tried changing the way we evaluate and report a business. Our focus should be on implementing the plan to increase profitability and reduce cost. The best way to accomplish this is to make it easier for stakeholders to understand what has taken place in our business, and to learn about why the business decisions they make have taken them into alignment with our business cycles. Once we have agreed on a plan, we no longer have to pay the expenses and the costs of the change. Rather, we have to be open and honest by discussing, and meeting, important business decisions using real examples from the business life and from time to time as well. My proposal would be to focus on the goals, actions, and practices now and in the future, as well as where and when we look to bring back the change that has taken place in our business cycle.
* Many of the business cycles need to be changed before we
Sustainable business decisions should not take too long:
* The world has a few new ways of doing things. This involves many different processes and forms of business transformation, the ability to create a profitable business, and the ability to innovate to improve things. It is a simple and effective way to improve results, reduce costs and deliver more benefits. The real goal is to produce results that align with our evolving business cycles and to have no matter how hard a change is, and that we can use this knowledge to be better organized and more sustainable. It is also an effective way to avoid losing the best practices because they are not yet the best policy. It is a very good way to make business decisions that are fair and productive, so that we can better realize our goals. What we need to do is re-take that time to understand what is necessary and not only what we need to do to make a better business. We may find the best business decision-making has been made with time, on paper. We may not win. But we are doing what is right. We may be surprised when, after a couple more years, we win our business.
* The ability to create the right time to change the business cycles is a key part of doing sustainability, and the process must stop immediately. This goal can be achieved if we know how to improve the efficiency of the processes, processes, processes, processes. However, it must stop at the root of making changes in our business, whether that is changing the design and design of services within the organization, how we perform our internal processes in conjunction with other components within the organization, and those aspects of corporate governance that are already at the top of my list.
* It is important for any policy to reflect the vision, vision, and understanding of the stakeholders. We need to take action where it is that we do that. Because we need the right time to engage with stakeholders, we need to set and implement plans to improve processes, processes, processes, processes, processes. A business with strong business cycles needs to be able to communicate and share information with its stakeholders, but not have a rigid system and a system that tries to control all aspects of the business. I have tried changing the way we evaluate and report a business. Our focus should be on implementing the plan to increase profitability and reduce cost. The best way to accomplish this is to make it easier for stakeholders to understand what has taken place in our business, and to learn about why the business decisions they make have taken them into alignment with our business cycles. Once we have agreed on a plan, we no longer have to pay the expenses and the costs of the change. Rather, we have to be open and honest by discussing, and meeting, important business decisions using real examples from the business life and from time to time as well. My proposal would be to focus on the goals, actions, and practices now and in the future, as well as where and when we look to bring back the change that has taken place in our business cycle.
* Many of the business cycles need to be changed before we
Sustainable business decisions should not take too long:
* The world has a few new ways of doing things. This involves many different processes and forms of business transformation, the ability to create a profitable business, and the ability to innovate to improve things. It is a simple and effective way to improve results, reduce costs and deliver more benefits. The real goal is to produce results that align with our evolving business cycles and to have no matter how hard a change is, and that we can use this knowledge to be better organized and more sustainable. It is also an effective way to avoid losing the best practices because they are not yet the best policy. It is a very good way to make business decisions that are fair and productive, so that we can better realize our goals. What we need to do is re-take that time to understand what is necessary and not only what we need to do to make a better business. We may find the best business decision-making has been made with time, on paper. We may not win. But we are doing what is right. We may be surprised when, after a couple more years, we win our business.
* The ability to create the right time to change the business cycles is a key part of doing sustainability, and the process must stop immediately. This goal can be achieved if we know how to improve the efficiency of the processes, processes, processes, processes. However, it must stop at the root of making changes in our business, whether that is changing the design and design of services within the organization, how we perform our internal processes in conjunction with other components within the organization, and those aspects of corporate governance that are already at the top of my list.
* It is important for any policy to reflect the vision, vision, and understanding of the stakeholders. We need to take action where it is that we do that. Because we need the right time to engage with stakeholders, we need to set and implement plans to improve processes, processes, processes, processes, processes. A business with strong business cycles needs to be able to communicate and share information with its stakeholders, but not have a rigid system and a system that tries to control all aspects of the business. I have tried changing the way we evaluate and report a business. Our focus should be on implementing the plan to increase profitability and reduce cost. The best way to accomplish this is to make it easier for stakeholders to understand what has taken place in our business, and to learn about why the business decisions they make have taken them into alignment with our business cycles. Once we have agreed on a plan, we no longer have to pay the expenses and the costs of the change. Rather, we have to be open and honest by discussing, and meeting, important business decisions using real examples from the business life and from time to time as well. My proposal would be to focus on the goals, actions, and practices now and in the future, as well as where and when we look to bring back the change that has taken place in our business cycle.
* Many of the business cycles need to be changed before we
Article 1Whitfield and Szeto researched a project of a small manufacturing company, based in Hong Kong, who applied BPR techniques to its operations. This company was growing and their organizational needs were substantially changing. For further and future growth, the company had to streamline and systematize their operations. BPR provided an excellent vehicle for this companys organizational needs. However, this company as well as other small companies cannot afford nor do they need a major overhaul of its organizational processes to administer BPR initiatives. In this case study, it was better for a small business to rely on upper management teams to delegate responsibilities to handle specific problems as they occur. This study also showed how it is neither important nor wise for small businesses to focus on IT. Making IT the focal point of a small business BPR would be too costly and needless for any small growing business.
Article 2In a journal by Hengst and Vreede, Nine BPR projects were executed and analyzed in detail, leading to 87 identified themes in regards to the effectiveness and efficiency of the project. In the themes, 12 categories of lessons learned were developed to later be titled the Collaborative business engineering (CBE) approach to BPR. The authors combined CBE and BPR processes to address reasons for BPR failure. This study focused on two particular factors as to why BPR projects fail: poor stakeholder involvement and poor business process analysis.
Poor stakeholder involvement occurs when you have insufficient involvement of top and middle managers. This can happen when you have the wrong individuals with opposing ideas or individuals with no creativity to