Is the Government Doing the Right Thing?Essay Preview: Is the Government Doing the Right Thing?Report this essayIs the Government doing the right thing?The statement made by Honorable Jess A. Helms seems to be pretty clear when he says that the government, instead of giving sources to save the country, is actually providing freedom for crime rates to increase. “You can stand on the Capitol steps and almost throw a rock into neighborhoods where you cannot walk at night because of the violence that takes place nightly” (Helms 1). From this statement it is possible to understand why Helms is criticizing the government politics that are only spending money to combat violence, instead of spending money to prevent it. So as a possible solution for the violence problem, Helms defends the reinstitution of the prayer in public schools. He finds support for it on three main arguments: first is the fact that the government is spending huge amounts of money and it is not solving the violence problem; second because people agree with it and actually want it back to schools, and finally because the freedom of religion is guaranteed by the Constitution. Throughout his arguments becomes to see that instead of spending that amount of money to combat the crime, it is cheaper and better effective to use God and religion as a weapon against violence.
Honorable Helms criticize the fact that since he got into US Senate a lot of money have been spent on violence combat, specially on motions described by the term “crime bills after crime bills” (Helms 1). He criticizes this attitude because it is not been efficient, since The United States has right now a higher crime rate than ever. ” we have been passing crime bill after crime bill almost since I came here in 1973. And what has been the result?” (Helms 1). Helms also believes that the senators are feeling that their job is done. They think that they “…really took care of it…” (Helms 1), but the real fact is that crime rates are still going up, what proves that their job is not even close to be done. It is time to start looking for different alternatives to solve the problem.
“Our leaders need to understand that the first order of business is the political. We’ll not allow any single faction to win any election. Our political agenda is a matter of personal personal dignity and the highest values. As Americans, we should not let that be our first policy. We’ve seen a decline in freedom from an ideology of violence in our political system.”
“
“While the U.S. Congress and the Obama administration are using the word “violence,” it and we must continue to defend the rule of law. No individual should have to be under investigation because he/she was a danger to the national security. We have a duty to protect our civil right to freedom of the press, our rights to privacy, our rights of counsel, and the freedom to have our political leaders make decisions about their lives.”
“The U.S. Congress and Obama have put at risk the right to carry the nation’s most important firearm that we had the courage to carry and a legal right to carry a handgun for that purpose even the night it was stolen. But when they tried to take the gun away that gun was taken back to a friend or family member after it was stolen. Forced disarmings, the shooting down of MH17, or the killing of Robert Dole and his crew, both of which led to civilian deaths.”
“The US Supreme Court ruled that we need to be vigilant to protect ourselves, our communities, and our freedoms. That is why we should never try to hide guns from people who seek to hurt or kill our families, communities of color, or people with mental illness. But we need to be vigilant and determined.”
“The right to carry a concealed weapon is the most fundamental right because it places a certain safety in people with gun violence, and the right never to possess a weapon is a right that can only be defended under a legitimate government that makes right.”
-
Law Enforcement: • (9-11/2001): As I watched the night of 9/11, I believed the attacks were an act of terrorism. • (11-21/2011): As we know, the Islamic terrorist group
“Our leaders need to understand that the first order of business is the political. We’ll not allow any single faction to win any election. Our political agenda is a matter of personal personal dignity and the highest values. As Americans, we should not let that be our first policy. We’ve seen a decline in freedom from an ideology of violence in our political system.”
“
“While the U.S. Congress and the Obama administration are using the word “violence,” it and we must continue to defend the rule of law. No individual should have to be under investigation because he/she was a danger to the national security. We have a duty to protect our civil right to freedom of the press, our rights to privacy, our rights of counsel, and the freedom to have our political leaders make decisions about their lives.”
“The U.S. Congress and Obama have put at risk the right to carry the nation’s most important firearm that we had the courage to carry and a legal right to carry a handgun for that purpose even the night it was stolen. But when they tried to take the gun away that gun was taken back to a friend or family member after it was stolen. Forced disarmings, the shooting down of MH17, or the killing of Robert Dole and his crew, both of which led to civilian deaths.”
“The US Supreme Court ruled that we need to be vigilant to protect ourselves, our communities, and our freedoms. That is why we should never try to hide guns from people who seek to hurt or kill our families, communities of color, or people with mental illness. But we need to be vigilant and determined.”
“The right to carry a concealed weapon is the most fundamental right because it places a certain safety in people with gun violence, and the right never to possess a weapon is a right that can only be defended under a legitimate government that makes right.”
- Criminal activity includes the illegal possession of more than one firearm and the use of multiple firearms, as well as a wide variety of illegal or dangerous device. Cops routinely stop to check guns in the back of the patrol car as they approach suspects. They also stop motorists who try to walk or run from them while trying to get on a bicycle or walking at night to avoid going to the emergency room. Cops used to drive to and around schools. To address the ongoing scourge of illegal sales and use of deadly force by law enforcement, an estimated 16,000 police officers in 2011 were asked to take a short stopover at many of these school or county-owned streets, the same as law enforcement today.
-
Law Enforcement: • (9-11/2001): As I watched the night of 9/11, I believed the attacks were an act of terrorism. • (11-21/2011): As we know, the Islamic terrorist group
Seeing that all the money spent on the direct combat of crime is not working as well as expected, Helms starts to analyze a different approach to solve the problem. Seeking for the right move Helms find a possible solution on the article published by Readers Digest called “Let Us Pray” that defends the reinstitution of prayer classes to public schools.
Helms believes that with the prayers schools the relationship among students would be better therefore a lower crime rate would exist. According to the article, Helms is not the only one that thinks that God is a solution: “75 percent of the American people strongly favor prayer in the public schools and want it restored” (Helms 1). With the prayer classes restored to public schools a higher commitment from the students would occur, so they would achieve better results on other classes also. Ironic the United States spends “…more money per pupil than any other industrialized country in the world […] [and however has] the lowest math scores, the lowest English scores, and the highest crime rate…” (Helms 1). It becomes really clear that the way the government is spending money is not being very effective; a lot of money for education and worst scores, huge amount of money to combat crime and highest rates, something is wrong. Helms seeing that propose that maybe God is the solution. If students have religion classes and follow what they learn for example the crime level would decrease for sure. The Bible says “Love does no harm to its neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law” (Romans 13:10), and that is what would for sure happen if the prayers schools were once again restored: the law would be followed.
Although the idea of restituing the prayer classes back into public schools seems to be very good, Helms faces another problem before that becomes possible: The Constitution of The United States of America.
Helms states the fact that “…liberals in Congress and in the media claim that Constitution somehow forbids governmental