American Industrial Revolution Dbq
Essay Preview: American Industrial Revolution Dbq
Report this essay
Prompt:
Access the validity of the following statement:
“Conditions in the United States were ripe for
an industrial revolution in the early 1800s.”
“Reaping What You Sow”:
The American Industrial Revolution
“The economy of the United States before the War of 1812 was largely shaped by geography” says Arnold S. Rice. Under Henry Clays American system, canals, railroads, and public education paramounted past internal improvements. (Doc B). The inventions oriented towards textile and locomotion sparked more invention and more production. Society, itself, conformed to the factory system and consolidated into industrial communities. In short, the early 1800s presented an unprecedented abundance of fuel for an industrial revolution in the United States. Prompting this rapid development of industry was the three driving powers of society, political development and policies, and economy and technology. The progression of society from yeomen farmers to industrial workers had developed largely by the 1820s.
Between 1820 and 1855, immigration increased from 2,000 annually to about 420,000. (Doc G). In 1848,German and other European refugees were able to abscond with enough money from their homeland to buy small plots of land in the Midwest, such as Cincinnati, St. Paul, St. Louis, Chicago, and Milwaukee, after the failed German revolution. Most immigrants were less fortunate, however. Many Irish took flight to America during the failure of the Irish potato crops between 1845 and 1850. These immigrants had little money and the South had little need for additional workers; they had slaves. They were forced to take manual jobs in the North, mainly in cities like Boston. This influx held the same pattern in the United States. One family wrote: “…the cause of our moving here…is the hard times to get a living off the farm…” (Doc C). Many families attempted to supplement their meager small farm incomes by sending women and children to the factories to work. This large influx in populations of immigrants and domestic workers increased productions and created a increasing trend towards a greater number of factories; From 1800 to 1860 the number of spindles in operation in the US increased from 2,000 to 5 million. Industry achieved a revolutionary point not only through redistribution of domestic and immigrant populations, but also through the Souths extensive use of slavery. Slavery in America came to a dramatic low in the late 1700s, but with the introduction of new technologies, ie. the cotton gin, and the Louisiana Purchase, which provided new fertile land along the Gulf of Mexico, the slave population increased from about 900 thousand in 1800 to numbers exceeding 4 million in 1860. Although the industrialists were slightly set back by unions and organized union movements, such as the National Trades Union and “Commonwealth vs. Hunt” (where Massachusetts Supreme Court established the right of workers to strike), the outcome was clearly in favor of industrial growth. In the 1820s, working groups demanded uniform 6 am to 6 pm work shifts, with an amount of two hours for meal breaks, and increased wages; these demands only succeeded in New York. Other employers took court action, forcing the striking workers back to the factories, or hired non-union workers. With this in mind, the social atmosphere of the early 1800s in America was prime real estate for an industrial revolution. Similarly, the political development and processes of the US at that time assisted in the industrial expansion of Americas markets and businesses.
The United States government advocated Henry Clays American system in generate protective tariffs, creating stimulating legal arrangements, reinforcing economic energy, allowing for a stable centralized revenue center, and educating the public. (Doc B). British Parliament, still bitter over the loss of American colonies, recommended, “to stifle in the cradle, those rising manufacturers in the United States, which war has forced into existence, contrary to the natural course of things.” They attempted to execute this plan by flooding American soil with inexpensive British manufactured goods. New England textile mills, Pennsylvania iron-smelters, hemp-growers of Kentucky, the wool-growers of Ohio and Vermont, and “an assortment [not the majority, however] of Southerners and Westerners who hoped to promote industry or to expand their domestic market…” knew that the British industry would crush the fragile industries is action were not put in place. (Doc D). President Thomas Jefferson, unwittingly, began what modern historians define as the beginning of the American Industrial Revolution. Jefferson supported and passed into law the widely unpopular Embargo Act, effectively cutting off America from the rest of the world. With little manufactured products being imported, Americans turned to the infant American industry. The War of 1812 further stimulated this growing sector of US economy, but after the Treaty of Ghent, the American industry had little protection from the already developed British industry. President John Quincy Adams, urged by Congress and Clay, signed into law the Tariff of 1828, later know as the Tariff of Abominations. In response to this, John C. Calhoun, Adamss Vice-President, secretly wrote the “South Carolina Exposition and Protest” calling for the nullification of this tariff, but it was met with little enthusiasm, and set the state for the “Nullification Crisis of 1832”. During this crisis, South Carolina blamed the drop of cotton prices on the protective tariff, instead of recognizing that many workers and planters had left the exhausted Atlantic Coast farmland for the rich soils of Alabama and Mississippi. In the heated debate between Daniel Webster and Robert Hayne in 1830, Hayne purposed the compact theory of government, where states could nullify presumably unconstitutional laws, as seen with the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of Madison and Jefferson. Webster rebutted with his famous response, ending with: “Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and insuperable.” Jackson, bent on keeping the union together, implemented forceful tactics, along with Clays superb negotiation skills, to keep South Carolina from succeeding. Jackson had signed into law the Tariff of 1832, reducing duties slightly below that of the Tariff of 1828. This is not what South Carolina had hoped for, however. They wanted a free market, so again presented their appeal. The state convention convened in November 1832, declaring the tariffs