Facebook and How It Affects Our LivesFacebook and How It Affects Our LivesKeywordsInternet, facebook social site,social relationships , antisocial behavior ,AbstractFacebook as a new social site trend is now the number one form of relationship creation. The development of Facebook has attracted much research from individuals interested in human relationships based on personal characteristics and personalities.
Prologue:“The internets ability may be referred to as a new world state,” as promulgated by Elmer Dewit Philip, an eminent author; it has a linchpin informative role but also a significant effect on communication because the internet today serves as a significant human necessity. Aside from the immense amount of information it offers, the internet since 2002 with the introduction of Friendster offers means of communication and interaction through websites referred to as ‘social sites. Friendster enabled its users to correspond with one another and to provide personal contact information. Within a few months, websites similar to Friendster started to become a new internet trend, such as Livejournal and Hi5. Recently, however, Facebook, which is celebrating its five year anniversary, has dominated the social site fad. In a recent study, 31% of the participants declared Facebook as one of their top five favorite websites whereas 15% categorized Facebook as their top website. Through Facebook, its users develop their social relationships by communicating with their friends but also by meeting new people all over the world through new Facebook friendships or by becoming members of certain groups affiliated either with a certain cause or purpose. Since its founding five years ago, Facebook has become a modern communication method. Facebook began in 2004 when Mark Zeckerberge, student at Harvard University, decided to create a social website for his university in order to communicate with his classmates. Later, this social website began in universities in Boston and the New England area. Facebook remained a communication method only for American universities until September 2006 when any user around the world was permitted to create a Facebook account. The founder decided to expand the site to non-university students in order to keep in contact with university graduates because these individuals after graduation could no longer keep their Facebook accounts. When Facebook became a worldwide social website, Zeckerberge experienced major success. This success, however, resulted in a major lawsuit between Mark Zeckerberge and Harvard University graduates Tyler Winkeleross, Divya Narendra, and Cameron Winkeleross in order to legally determine who possessed the idea for Facebook. The aforementioned graduates insist that they hired Zeckerberge in 2003 in order to complete their social site project name ConnectU when he stole their idea. Allegations state that Zeckerberge disappeared between November 2003 and January 2004, and he continuously avoided communication with the three graduates. The ownership of Facebook will be decided in court. In addition, another Harvard graduate has accused Zeckerberge for stealing his idea. He said, “I do not know if Mark purposely copied or if it happens to a coincidence, but I do know that hes dishonest. I have seen him lie before.” Six months before Facebooks creation, this Harvard graduate also created a social site called HouseSYSTEM that enabled its users through a certain application to upload photographs and personal information called “Face book.” This name similarity, however, does not prove anything because all university students in the United States receive a book called “Face Book” with each students picture and contact information in order to promote communication among students.
Professor Nikolas Christakis of Harvard University asserted, “We are at the birth of an innovative interaction system.” In the United States, Facebook is receiving much academic research attention by experts in fields, such as psychology, sociology, and political science. Researchers found that Facebook enables its users to develop communication skills. Users tend to follow the Facebook trend of uploading photographs and joining groups associated with philanthropic and/or political causes, which build a certain type of community within this social site. The growing fad of using Facebook as a communication means instead of e-mail, mobile phone usage, or personal contact is starting to replace these types of “passé” forms of interaction in order to form a more efficient internet world state. Facebook, however, cannot be labeled as a negative or
futile entity, for example, the social media company, Facebook. In this article we will analyze the dynamics of social media, what is needed, and what can be done to improve it. We will examine the most promising and disruptive technologies, as well as their potential as a means for facilitating social media interaction.
As a social network, Facebook is the most important technology that may affect the future course of human behavior
(Lohmann, 2011, p. 717-618) Many individuals are confused by the idea of social networking, even though many would assume the opposite, we need much more. The way in which such technologies impact our lives is simply not understood. Some of the most prominent examples are: • Facebook • Twitter. While these are relatively new technologies, most of them are well-validated research. • Smartphone • Twitter.
As we discussed when we looked through the social technologies of the year, they all have their downsides, such as lack of information, insufficient awareness, and time. Some companies are trying to make it a lot easier and give more value to users by giving them less content. The Internet doesn’t actually have a “smartphone” as the first step. There are certainly some areas of work on what constitutes content for other platforms. But even in such a fast paced world where most people are still using their phones every day, it will take a long time before we understand the true value of these technologies. How users respond to such advancements is largely a question of perception of the social media ecosystem as a whole.
In order to be successful, it will only take the kind of system that has been developed and perfected for many decades (see: e-mail, mobile phone, Instagram, Facebook) to improve the amount of user participation. Of course, this is one of the main reasons that Facebook has become such a popular online platform, including as an example of why its success is as good any time of the year. In addition, this gives the company, not only the incentive to improve its system from now on, but also allows the users of this Internet platform (many of whom rely on them, for many reasons) to think and think about how they are going to interact with other people through different means and at different times, when they are not on board with these platforms. In short, this new social network paradigm is an exciting step forward that will lead to much more user understanding and will even improve how social media is used, both socially and in reality.
Many scientists believe that the fundamental idea of social media is to provide individuals, not individuals, with a unified body of knowledge. Social Media will allow people to connect socially and without having to feel like they either have to interact with one another via their social media profiles or via the messaging platform of Twitter or Facebook. This has the effect of boosting and increasing their social networks while simultaneously creating greater content for many of people.
What will we find in your social media?
Today I’m sharing an article of mine that explores what may come next in the next decades with regards to social networking.
It is my understanding that the major social media platforms we are going to see are YouTube, Google+, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, Messenger, Tumblr, Gmail, Skype, and WhatsApp. These social networking platforms provide the backbone to the entire web, but may be the most innovative technology that