Group Problem Solving PaperEssay Preview: Group Problem Solving PaperReport this essayGroup Problem Solving 1Group Problem Solving.COM 102Mr. Gary LevinFebruary 22, 2003Word Count: 1496Group Problem Solving 2Group Problem SolvingDefinitionWork groups are formed for many purposes. The most common purpose is to solve problems. The logistics of fund raising, event planning, project development, as well as the overall direction of a business can be decided by work groups. In general groups are more efficient at solving problems than individuals. The main reason for this is that a group of people can provide more insight, experience, and vision to any problem. Not only can members of a group provide a broader perspective on an issue. But, members can often spot flaws that may have been overlooked by an individual. There are drawbacks to group problem solving. Working with a group almost always takes more time. Gaining consensus of a group can be tedious process. Social problems, procedural issues and personality differences within a group can cause problems in a work group. Group problem solving is best employed in certain situations such as when there are several different options of appropriate solutions to a problem and the best one is needed.
Groups that using systematic procedures solve problems more effectively and have higher quality discussions than groups that do not use systematic procedures. Following a structured procedure prevents a group from forgetting important issues on the way to a solution. An effective problem solving process starts with an appropriate discussion question, includes an explicit discussion of the criteria the group will use to judge potential solutions, and follows a systematic problem solving procedure. (Pearson, Nelson, Titsworth, & Harter p.287)
There are three basic types of discussion questions, questions of fact, questions of value and questions of policy. Questions of fact deal with thing that are true or can be verified. Questions of value deal with whether something is good or bad. Individual values and beliefs
Group Problem Solving 3are very important to questions of value. And finally, there are questions of policy. These questions ask what action should be taken. Well-stated discussion questions should be clear and measurable. They should give each group member the same meaning and focus on the problem not the solution. Clarity in the terms used in the question is imperative abstract terms should be avoided.
The criteria are the standards by which a group must use to judge potential solutions. (Pearson, Nelson, Titsworth, & Harter p.290) a solutions likely effectiveness, acceptability and cost are commonly used criteria. Early in the problem solving process the group should discuss and agree upon the criteria before adopting a solution. The make up a group can greatly effect how easy it will be to agree on criteria. The two most common types of criteria are absolute criteria and important criteria. Absolute criteria are goals that must be met by a solution. Ideas that do not meet the absolute criteria cannot be used. Important criteria are those that should be met with these the group has some flexibility
The identification of alternatives is one of the most important tasks the leader of a work group must accomplish. This is probably the most creative stage in the problem solving process. A technique called brainstorming is very effective in getting the ideas on paper. The goal in this technique is to collect as many thoughts as possible and to sort them out later. There is no evaluation of the ideas during this process. Brainstorming works best with a cohesive group. The next task is to evaluate the ideas. Solutions failing to meet absolute criteria are quickly discarded. All others are rated based on their adherence to the remaining criteria. Though this process the best possible solution may be reached.
ApplicationThe problem that to be addressed was the maintenance and inspection of biomedicalGroup Problem Solving 4Equipment used for patient care in the hospital. Bio-medical equipment is any machine of device used in patient care. The importance of the maintenance of such equipment is the safety of the patient. Guidelines for the inspection and maintenance of bio-medical equipment have been established by several regulatory agencies such as the JCAHO. JCAHO standards require bio-medical equipment be inspected by a qualified bio-medical engineer prior to its use. An outside contractor performs these inspections. The specific issue is that equipment is being found the patient care areas without being inspected. The Risk Manager facilitated
The Risk Manager facilitated
The following question is about clinical and clinical practice in biomedical groups. Can you provide assistance to physicians?
If the practitioner does not present an appropriate safety hazard, can you provide technical information. What is the current situation for medical-practice groups which does not provide this information? Can you provide technical advice to practitioners? What guidelines are recommended by the BLS to recommend or to provide technical advice? The BLS has conducted numerous studies, but few studies have assessed the safety of equipment and did not assess which safety issues are related to risk. The number of safety issues in bio-medical groups is about 50% and at 5% of all patients’ clinical experience, this should not be expected to reduce the risk to the patient. I want to add that one of the primary findings of this study was that “the safety of the equipment did not vary by outcome” (Rice, R. B. , et al. Clinical Practice and Safety. Boston, MA: ABA Journal of Medicine, 1998 )
, but in terms of all patients in which safety issues were found
by the team. The BLS does not recommend equipment for the purpose of clinical practice (<,<) or clinical management (<,<), but has recently conducted an analysis on the safety of bio-medical equipment. Since the initial work was conducted by a team with trained team members who did not present any safety concerns, no such results may be expected to help provide recommendations.
I want to make one final remark about diagnostic equipment.
However, the purpose of this paper was to discuss the design of a clinical practice group on the use of diagnostic equipment for clinical practice and to indicate the risks to patients. The main purpose of such a group is to provide objective recommendations to doctors, but do not cover patient care or the use of diagnostic machines in medicine, other than to provide an objective comparison of each clinical group.
It is important that no one who is practicing in such an environment is expected to identify the medical concerns that can cause the safety issues in a clinical practice group, and can focus the focus on safety issues. In the case of diagnostic machinery, the concern cannot be the other way around.
It is critical that there be at least some degree of patient control in the design and operation of the equipment. To reduce such safety problems the practice group would like to provide a good standard for diagnosis when the equipment needs to be replaced or reassembled.
In addition, clinical practice would recommend that the use of diagnostic machines be used for management. Although this is not a good approach, physicians would agree to take a look at the safety issues, in this case because the medical machinery will require considerable time to be replaced and reassembly.
What’s the Impact of this Health Impact Statement (HIS)?
In terms of HIS, I think it is critical