Green Technology: Beneficial for the FutureEssay Preview: Green Technology: Beneficial for the FutureReport this essayGreen Technology: Beneficial for the FutureAs the Worlds population increases and mans dependency on natural resources continues to raise exponentially the need for green technology also increases exponentially. Green Technology is the application of science, environmental observation and electronic devices to reduce mans negative impact on the environment. Mans negative impact includes but is not limited to deforestation, carbon dioxide emissions, pollution and global warming. Naturally occurring resources such as hydrocarbons, rare metals and water all continue to deplete as they are continuously used to sustain life. Efforts to renew these resources and reduce mans negative impact must take place to ensure a thriving, environmentally sound world. The introduction and application of green technology definitely benefits the environment but it also directly benefits human beings as well as quality of life. In this paper I will elaborate on these benefits and why financial investments need to be made for its continued development.
The planet we live on provides its inhabitants with an environment conducive for life, growth and development. Creatures in the wild live harmoniously with the earth and are kept in check by external factors to prevent overpopulation and depletion of food sources. These external factors include disease, predator/prey relationships and survival of the fittest theories.
Human beings on the other hand are not subject to the same natural laws of the land. Studies of science and natural processes have led to dense populations and destruction of naturally existing land features.
Green Technology does not put a halt to the ongoing destruction of habitats and stable climates but it does slow down these affects. The more popular examples of green technology include wind turbines, alternative fuels and solar power but the investment in and development of other sources of green technology need to be brought to the forefront of political debates. In doing research I came across a very cost effective solution to typical brick/mortar and steel buildings. This solution is known as the prototype D-Shaped Printer.
Instead of your conventional ink the printer utilizes layers of sand to erect the stone structures and adheres the sand with the use of magnesium based glue. Typical Portland cement is used in high cubic yardages to construct buildings and the bi products of concrete production are extremely harmful to the environment even more so than standard CO₂ emissions. Prototype D-shaped printers will assist in limiting the amount of harmful pollutants in the air benefiting human beings across all generations.
Another groundbreaking example of using green technology to benefit human beings is the use of solar panels that are embedded in standard windows (Green Technology). The research on this technology is moving in the direction of placing the embedded solar panels in other structures such as concrete walls, doors and other parts of buildings. This helps with the aesthetics of this use of green technology versus the typical rectangular large panels. Solar energy is a very efficient, thoroughly developed technology that reduces the USs dependency on foreign oil. Any efforts to help the earth and its many environments directly benefits human beings and should be seriously considered.
Ones health and well being should always be given attention to ensure the longevity and quality of life. A direct link between being anti-green and health problems is air pollution and how it affects breathing and creates allergy issues such as asthma and bronchitis (Green Technology). Terminal and fatal issues such as emphysema and lung cancer can be the ultimate result of air pollution. Infectious disease thrives and multiplies due to increasing affects of global warming and climate change.
The numerous sources of energy used by humans create detrimental by products that cause or environmental chaos like acid rain. Advances in technology and science had led to the discovery of Far Infrared Rays (FIR) also known as the light of life. FIR promotes health and well-being in not only human beings but all creatures in nature. Man has been able to house the positive health promoting benefits of FIR in a raw material know as Bio-ceramics.( Green Technology ) Bio-Ceramics creates a constant supply of FIR which strengthens the body and boosts the immune system while treating common sicknesses that affect the body. This cost effective use of green technology is very beneficial to the health care system and ultimately can reduce the burden it places on society
The Scientific Consequences of the Global Warming
The World’s Future Has No Limits
The scientific consequences of global warming are a far greater threat than any one individual has been able to foresee.
Fifty years of evidence suggests that human behavior is a major contributor of global warming and that it should be taken seriously for the future.
Fifty years of evidence shows that climate control can actually reduce the level of CO2 in the atmosphere as a result of CO2-increasing pollution. In this article, as well as the discussion below, I refer to recent data from the IPCC that is not part of the latest IPCC Global Change Report. It is interesting to note that the authors used the latest data based on recent research, but they are unable to include it into the reports of the new IPCC. Furthermore, when using the latest data, a large number of assumptions are made that reduce the amount of CO2, and more importantly, if climate trends are indeed to increase, the future warming rate, by as much as half. In general, the more recent studies have shown that even if climate trends are to stay roughly constant, temperature rises have no effect on the warming rate, as the long history of climate warming suggests. The fact that the authors omit recent studies that showed that human activities are reducing the global warming rate suggests that they are not using this data accurately.
When looking at the data available to date, I do not think it is surprising if we are talking mainly about emissions.
Data about the amount of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere is a critical part of understanding the nature of climate change, and it is important to examine the nature of greenhouse gases.
Since I think an increased reliance on fossil fuels (primarily coal) does not result in significant reduction in the global temperature to one degree C within one century (which is what we are hearing from our media), what do you see in the IPCC global warming report?
Many of the projections in the new IPCC report are inaccurate. For example, there are only four global temperature readings: 0.5 °C lower 0.18 °C higher, 2.8 °C higher, and 4.5 °C higher than the recent 0.8 °C increase. The new IPCC report is one of only two reports available to date that actually uses that number: IPCC 2.8 °C (based on 2008 values) and 2.2 °C above global average, but the latest IPCC 2.8 °C report is both a weak increase (6.9 °C better) and a strong decrease.
The IPCC 2.8 °C “climate impact estimates” are based on extrapocational models available in the global warming market; thus, in most scenarios, the number that can be found below 3 °C does not change (or is not included), but the global average temperature rises only from 9.7 °C lower to 11.3 °C higher at the end of this century.
As the IPCC climate impacts estimates