The Conservative MovementEssay Preview: The Conservative MovementReport this essayThe new wave of the right wing conservative movement started in the 1980s with the yuppies. The young urban professionals were all about business and money and of course most of them were part of the GOP (Republican Party). They strayed away from the left wing liberals like hippies most hippies could have had a yuppie as a baby. The presidents we had were a part of this movement to Ronald Reagan (1981-1989 Republican) started this movement; George Bush (1989-1993 Republican) kept the movement going, Bill Clinton (1993-2001 Democrat) the movement calmed down at this point. Now it comes full circle with George W. Bush (2001-present).
\r
This is the year 2010. The big changes had been evident for decades. As we have seen, they are not new in our history. They have been done many times in a row, especially not in the Republican Party. You do not have to wonder why the GOP was not successful in the 2000 presidential election. It was all the Bushites with their own ideas – George W. Bush. I am going to show you how this is now possible as well, starting at the beginning. You will see how much the GOP lost its mind after the elections, when they refused to have a public vote on any bill they wanted. They lost it because they lost the public vote by just three points…
The Conservatives are coming with a new idea and the one they are about to put into place is a new plan to deal with the deficit. They plan on changing the way the federal government spends the money so as to make it less than it is today. This means increasing the budget of the government and taking back all federal funding as quickly as possible. And to give you an idea of how far that is, the Liberals made it their policy to keep raising income taxes through a system to fund the middle classes to pay for the deficit in the next five years rather than continuing with the Bush tax cuts now that Obama inherited. And on top of this the whole plan is to increase spending on the government and raise it from a deficit of at least $5 trillion. They call for a 5 percent cut in Social Security which would cost them only about $550 billion a year as part of the plan while allowing the government to spend the rest on Social Security. I am in agreement with this. All in all this is not a completely different version of the Reagan plan. They have created a system where a government spending $600 billion annually on social programs is essentially tax increases on all private employees regardless of how much money they make. Of course this idea is not going anywhere. In fact after
\r
This is the year 2010. The big changes had been evident for decades. As we have seen, they are not new in our history. They have been done many times in a row, especially not in the Republican Party. You do not have to wonder why the GOP was not successful in the 2000 presidential election. It was all the Bushites with their own ideas – George W. Bush. I am going to show you how this is now possible as well, starting at the beginning. You will see how much the GOP lost its mind after the elections, when they refused to have a public vote on any bill they wanted. They lost it because they lost the public vote by just three points…
The Conservatives are coming with a new idea and the one they are about to put into place is a new plan to deal with the deficit. They plan on changing the way the federal government spends the money so as to make it less than it is today. This means increasing the budget of the government and taking back all federal funding as quickly as possible. And to give you an idea of how far that is, the Liberals made it their policy to keep raising income taxes through a system to fund the middle classes to pay for the deficit in the next five years rather than continuing with the Bush tax cuts now that Obama inherited. And on top of this the whole plan is to increase spending on the government and raise it from a deficit of at least $5 trillion. They call for a 5 percent cut in Social Security which would cost them only about $550 billion a year as part of the plan while allowing the government to spend the rest on Social Security. I am in agreement with this. All in all this is not a completely different version of the Reagan plan. They have created a system where a government spending $600 billion annually on social programs is essentially tax increases on all private employees regardless of how much money they make. Of course this idea is not going anywhere. In fact after
\r
This is the year 2010. The big changes had been evident for decades. As we have seen, they are not new in our history. They have been done many times in a row, especially not in the Republican Party. You do not have to wonder why the GOP was not successful in the 2000 presidential election. It was all the Bushites with their own ideas – George W. Bush. I am going to show you how this is now possible as well, starting at the beginning. You will see how much the GOP lost its mind after the elections, when they refused to have a public vote on any bill they wanted. They lost it because they lost the public vote by just three points…
The Conservatives are coming with a new idea and the one they are about to put into place is a new plan to deal with the deficit. They plan on changing the way the federal government spends the money so as to make it less than it is today. This means increasing the budget of the government and taking back all federal funding as quickly as possible. And to give you an idea of how far that is, the Liberals made it their policy to keep raising income taxes through a system to fund the middle classes to pay for the deficit in the next five years rather than continuing with the Bush tax cuts now that Obama inherited. And on top of this the whole plan is to increase spending on the government and raise it from a deficit of at least $5 trillion. They call for a 5 percent cut in Social Security which would cost them only about $550 billion a year as part of the plan while allowing the government to spend the rest on Social Security. I am in agreement with this. All in all this is not a completely different version of the Reagan plan. They have created a system where a government spending $600 billion annually on social programs is essentially tax increases on all private employees regardless of how much money they make. Of course this idea is not going anywhere. In fact after
There is one classic book that was too obscene for the conservatives so they banned it. The book was The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain. It was placed on the banned list twice and has been twice removed. The first time it was banned in 1965 by the NAACP because it used the word nigger too many times, then in 1984 because a black alderman found the books language offensive. Not only do I think it is wrong to ban any type of literature but how can they say what is obscene and offensive? Another American classic that was banned was The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck once again it was for the vulgarity of the book.
The stifling effect of censorship is worse now since the Janet Jackson fiasco at Superbowl XXXVIII. The FCC was and still is doing a crack down on any and everything they find obscene. Howard Stern takes the spot light, with his “crude” humor and brash way of doing things. The FCC doesnt like him very much. They fined him a record $495,000 for a “blumpkin” reference. The FCC can fine you for things they deem are obscene and vulgar. The only problem is he said this obscene reference over two years before they fined him which has never been done. All that will change on January 2006 when Howard moves to satellite radio.
Satellite radio is new and has only been on the market for about 5 years. Its like cable T.V. for the radio and that is a good thing for Howard Stern or any Shock Jocks. It is good because the FCC cant fine or censor any pay service because you (the buyer) want it. There are two different types of satellite radio though one is XM and the other is Sirius. Howard chose the latter in a tremendous $50 million deal for five years. The FCC cant censor something you subscribe to so thats why Howard is making the