Justice Ruth Ginsburg
Essay Preview: Justice Ruth Ginsburg
Report this essay
Much of the initial resistance to Ginsburgs nomination came from within the feminist movement because she had expressed reservations about the reasoning of the Supreme Courts decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) upholding a womans right to choose an abortion. Ginsburg would have preferred a more measured approach–an opinion that invited gradual liberalization of state abortion laws, one that might avoid a political backlash. At her confirmation hearings, however, Ginsburg dispelled any doubts about her commitment to a womans reproductive choice. She characterized a womans right to choose an abortion as “something central to a womans life, to her dignity And when government controls that decision for her, shes being treated as less than a full adult human being responsible for her own choices.”
The Senate voted 97-3 to confirm Ginsburgs nomination, and she took the oath of office on August 10, 1993. Ginsburgs second major opinion on the Supreme Court displayed her characteristic tendency to approach legal questions in terms of real-world experience. In Ratzlaf v. United States (1994), Ginsburg wrote the Courts opinion reversing a criminal conviction for “willfully violating” a prohibition on “structuring” cash transactions so as to avoid a reporting requirement applicable to transactions involving more than $10,000. A majority of the Court concluded that the prosecution had to prove the defendant knew of not only the reporting requirement, but also the prohibition on breaking up transactions to evade it. The government had argued that the very act of structuring suggested an involvement in criminal activity, such as money laundering or tax evasion, and thereby demonstrated the necessary bad intent. In rejecting this argument, Ginsburg listed several innocent reasons that might motivate an ordinary citizen to break up cash deposits into small sums, such as a fear of burglary