Deviance
Essay Preview: Deviance
Report this essay
“Discuss how one of the sociological theories of deviance can be used to explain social phenomena, such as pornography, drug use, suicide and disability.”
By Vanessa Neil
1 – Introduction
2 – A Brief background to the Interactionist Perspective
3 – More recent developments in the Interactionist Perspective
4 – Using the Interactionist Perspective to explain social phenomena
5 – Conclusion
Introduction
Deviant behaviour has sadly been a ongoing occurrence in society throughout history, more noticeably in life today. Sociologists have been provoked to study and form theories in order to try and explain why social phenomena such as suicide, prostitution and drug use occur in our society. The Interactionist Perspective, known to many as the Labelling Theory, is interested in social processes and examines deviant behaviour using such methods as social typing. The Interactionists emphasise the role that meanings play in the creation of deviant behaviour and gain a greater understanding of what it means to commit actions that others label as deviant.
A Brief background to the Interactionist Perspective
In order to discuss how the Interactionist theory can be used to explain deviance, it is necessary to understand the historical development and approach of this theory.
The Interactionists firstly believe that there are no behaviours that are intrinsically deviant. Secondly, Deviant actions are simply those which are defined as deviant within a certain culture or setting. Therefore Interactionists focus on social processes by which certain behaviours become known as deviant and the consequences for those who are labelled deviant. (Aggleton, 1987, chpt 4)
The Interactionist approach was at its height during the 1960s and 1970s, shedding a whole new, fresh perspective on the study of deviance. Here in Australia research on deviance was basically Functionalist and Positivist, Until 1970 when more critical approaches, like the Interactionist perspective began to appear. (Sargent, Nillan & Winter, 1997, pg 387)
Interestingly the origins of the Interactionist approach go back as far as 18th century Philosophers, arguing with Positivists about how to best explain social behaviour. In 1938, professor, Frank Tannenbaum first observed the actual reactions to certain behaviours, rather than on behaviours themselves. Furthermore, there were a number of sociologists around the 1930s whom more formally commenced what is known today as the ÐInteractionist perspective of Deviance. Charles Cooley and the Ðlooking Glass Self, William Thomas and the ÐDefinition of the situation, George Herbert Mead and the ÐDevelopment of the self. (Aggleton, 1987, chpt 4)
Charles Cooley and his Ðlooking Glass self notes how people tend to think they appear to others and the judgements these people may make on us. This concept is very important in how we, ourselves, tend to act in certain situations and how we see ourselves.(Pontell, 1999, pg 50) Therefore People who perceive that others think they display so called Ðdeviant behaviour will live up to this judgement and continue to behave in this way in the future.
William Thomas and his ÐDefinition of the situation is a continuation of Charles Cooleys study. Thomas argues that Situations defined as real become real in the deviants consequences. In 1923, Thomas conducted a study of a young woman who turned to Prostitution, she concluded that this was the only way she could financially provide for herself. (Aggleton, 1987, pg 51) “This suggests that the perceived judgements of others have a powerful role to play in confirming self-identities and the behaviour that can follow from these.” (Aggleton, 1987, pg 51)
George Herbert Mead and his ÐDevelopment of the self is responsible for a number of concepts which provide the foundations of what the Interactionist Theory is about. Mead focused primarily on the way in which we as humans interpret the world we live in through the use of symbols, images, sounds, smells, etc. “By interacting symbolically with significant others (people close to us), we learn to Ðrole-take, taking on board first of all, the roles of significant others towards us, but eventually the more general expectations of society at large.” (Aggleton, 1987, pg 53)
More recent developments in the Interactionist perspective
In the 1960s, sociologists such as Herbert Blumer, Erving Goffman and Howard Becker went on to develop further the ideas and theories the earlier Interactionist
sociologists had made.
Herbert Blummer, a student of George Herbert Mead, continued to study the concept of ÐInterpretation. The notion of Ðinterpretation became fundamental to the Interactionist approach, Blummer arguing that Ðacts only become deviant once they have been interpreted by others as such. (Aggleton, 1987, pg 53)
Erving Goffman brought about vital research concerning the idea of Ðsocial identity, which distinguishes “Personal qualities that remain constant across different situations (Aggleton, 1987, pg 65) Goffman also looked at the reaction of others towards us, especially negative judgements that others make. According to Goffman, this causes Ðdamaged or Ðspoiled identities being forced upon people. He names this process Stigmatisation.
Howard Becker was responsible for two vital processes in the Interactionist analyses of deviance. Firstly that of a Ðdeviant career, implying that people tend to “pass through a series of stages in becoming deviant.”