The Game of Global Domination – Term Paper – seanpk94
Search
Essays
Sign up
Sign in
Contact us
Tweet
Index
/American History
The Game of Global Domination
Sean KellyPS 210MW 10-11:50Risk: The Game of Global DominationUsername: sean4kelly94Password: seanieboy94        “In the classic “World Domination RISK¼‘” game of military strategy, you are battling to conquer the world. To win, you must launch daring attacks, defend yourself on all fronts, and sweep across vast continents with boldness and cunning. But remember, the dangers, as well as the rewards, are high. Just when the world is within your grasp, your opponent might strike and take it all away!” The previous paragraph is the introduction to the game of Risk that was provided by Professor Nicholas Spina in relation to this paper. The introduction references several of the assumptions put forth by the creators of the game and are very important when analyzing how it symbolizes certain ideals relating to international relations. The first of these assumptions can be found in the first sentence of the introduction when it states that we are “battling to conquer the world.” Although this is not necessarily true in the real world, it does represent realist ideals and puts them forward within this game. Which is to “launch daring attacks, defend yourself on all fronts, and sweep across vast continents” in order to have the most power and dominate the world.The problem with realism in this game however, is that it showcases the assumptions of its foundations and faults that embody it. All of these assumptions turn out to be correct. The foundations of realism state that human nature is selfish, conflict is inevitable, and resources are scarce. Within the game we see that human nature is selfish because we know the point of the game is to win and in order to do that, all actors will attack instead of being diplomatic. With that assumption in mind, it proves that unless there is communication in between states; conflict is inevitable. Also, the only resources in this game are land and armies. Being selfish and wanting to win, coincided with limited resources just reaffirms the assumption that conflict is inevitable. Faults lie within the assumption that being a realist who wants only power will win you the game. The largest of which is the belief that states will be rational actors. This is because of the lack of information available in order to make a well informed decision. This becomes evident in regards to the tactics of other actors, as well as how many cards and ultimately how many armies they might have in the future. This would extremely assist you in deciding who to attack and how you assign your troops. Another major fault concerns there being a security dilemma. This is choosing whether or not to attack or not attack. This can be very difficult in the game because of a lack of communication so you would be taking a big risk when choosing not to shoot. With very little information, it is almost always in your best interest to shoot and hope that you can conquer the territory. Which would ultimately give you more power and help you, as a realist, to “conquer the world”.

Realism, Dominance, Rationality, Prisoner’s Dilemma, Arms Race, and Hegemonic War are all terms that can be used to help describe this game. The first of which that presents itself in the game is the prisoner’s dilemma in which all could do better, but do not coordinate. At the very beginning of the game we are given the knowledge that if we all survive, everyone gets 4 extra credit points. However, if a team ultimately wins, they receive 10 extra credit points. Therefore, the decision needs to be made of whether or not to cooperate and all try and gain the four extra points or attack to try and get the ten points. More than likely though, there will be a fight for dominance and a Hegemonic War will break out between the groups. This shows that players in this game must be realists in which only power matters and they end up fighting in order to be that top dog. This turns into a constant arms race, or the development of armies in that fight. In order to win however, states need to have some rationality. To do this they must set and rank goals, consider all possible alternatives, and choose the best option with the highest benefit and lowest cost so that they might win. The result of my practice simulations was fairly positive when I didn’t lose a game due to inactivity. Out of the five games I finished, I won three of the games and took fourth and fifth in the other two. With a 60% percentage win rate, I am very pleased with that. Playing the computers is difficult though and one of the most challenging aspects of the game was accepting the fact that half the outcome is based on luck. Whether it be from rolling the die or which territories you take over in the beginning. Sometimes having the larger force doesn’t always necessarily mean that you will win a dispute.

Continue for 5 more pages »
Read full document
Download as (for upgraded members)
Citation Generator
MLA 7
CHICAGO
(2016, 04). The Game of Global Domination. EssaysForStudent.com. Retrieved 04, 2016, from
“The Game of Global Domination” EssaysForStudent.com. 04 2016. 2016. 04 2016 < "The Game of Global Domination." EssaysForStudent.com. EssaysForStudent.com, 04 2016. Web. 04 2016. < "The Game of Global Domination." EssaysForStudent.com. 04, 2016. Accessed 04, 2016. Essay Preview By: seanpk94 Submitted: April 26, 2016 Essay Length: 1,381 Words / 6 Pages Paper type: Term Paper Views: 440 Report this essay Tweet Related Essays Global Postitioning System Global Postitioning System The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a satellite-based navigation system made up of a network of 24 satellites placed into orbit by 1,060 Words  |  5 Pages The New Flirting Game The New Flirting Game When it comes to flirting today, women are not waiting around for men to make the first move, as they would 376 Words  |  2 Pages Electronic Arts and the Global Video Game Industry Environmental Analysis Demographic trends Gaming has become an important part of growing up for people who were born in the last 25 years. Approximately 3.9 2,080 Words  |  9 Pages Starbucks Corporation: Driving for Global Dominance Starbucks Corporation: Driving for Global Dominance Starbucks Corporation is a Seattle, Washington-based coffee company that buys, roasts, and sells whole bean specialty coffees and coffee 709 Words  |  3 Pages Similar Topics Affective Gaming Advantages Globalization Get Access to 89,000+ Essays and Term Papers Join 209,000+ Other Students High Quality Essays and Documents Sign up © 2008–2020 EssaysForStudent.comFree Essays, Book Reports, Term Papers and Research Papers Essays Sign up Sign in Contact us Site Map Privacy Policy Terms of Service Facebook Twitter

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Game Of Global Domination And Global Dominance Starbucks Corporation. (July 2, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/game-of-global-domination-and-global-dominance-starbucks-corporation-essay/