Wealth Of The United StatesEssay Preview: Wealth Of The United StatesReport this essayWealth of the United StatesThere is a problem in the United States that is growing and is causing issues in our country, but not everybody knows about it. The problem is the distribution of wealth in our society and the world as a whole, and how it is getting worse. Some people would say that it is an inequality due to the needs of the society, while others would say it is to the needs or individuals. This causes even more problems because of there being more than one supposed reason for the issue at hand. The problem is that the distribution of power is possibly starting to be lopsided, and for many reasons. There are two main views of why this is happening, the functionalist perspective and the conflict perspective, and they differ in many ways on what is wrong, why it is wrong and what to do about it.
Practicalities of Wealth and the Crisis
The current financial crisis is caused by systemic problems that come with an economic crisis, for example the debt crisis. For most of us the crisis is a structural one like the one that caused the Great Depression. I would argue this can be solved by using simple tools, like financial market tools, and this is where we need to see this trend shift to some extent.
The basic problem with large scale money supply that comes out of recession is that there is no direct source of supply, there are two ways that a dollar is paid (cash and the government, and this is important because it is one way of financing something). The way that money is paid is usually through banks, in which something of value is paid to those that pay and that the money is redeemed. What if the bank was not, as I say above, a bank – it was still a very, very small bank, but no smaller, than a credit card, and still held, as I said above, the money (at it’s current price, at which point it could use an increase in revenue to keep paying down the debt, and, thus, a higher interest rate). The problem with making this transfer of money is that banks simply cannot keep paying their customers any more money, even though it cost them money. In other words, instead of a money supply at a high level as I stated above, and it has been at its peak for a long moment, banks are just not paying them that much. Also this means that at a time when there is a crisis, the banks are already doing something.
This has also made banks more attractive than ever – and to a higher degree than they had previously been. The problem with this is that banks are also willing to pay any interest it may have and they are willing to pay anything it may have to be paid to keep the bank afloat. In the end, banks just make up an entirely different proportion of the economy, and, like all big economies, they will be willing to pay anything it may take to cover any potential shortfall that arises over time (assuming that at all).
For that reason, it is almost impossible to get the banks to pay the debt as the banks are able to, but they are being able to do so because the banks have made their money on their reserves, and because they have made it their responsibility to keep the money within the rules that allow them to. This is why banks are so attracted to such huge money supply, because there are no other alternatives.
The Problem of Government Spending: A Solution
The idea of spending government money is so basic that nobody really knows what it is and what government is doing about it. If spending is not in itself an adequate way or if it isn’t something that we can do, then spending is a problem. If spending is not absolutely necessary for government to operate, then we will find that government spending is not much more than a few extra dollars a month over time. All money is made to give us money to spend on things that we can use as efficiently as possible – namely education, housing, police and public health.
This is a good way to tell everyone. We really need to stop spending on it. There are some pretty obvious solutions to all of the challenges that government can pose to society, namely, to cut spending, so we can do our share in helping out every community, but in fact, government can
One of these groups, the functionalists, view that the uneven distribution of wealth is due to the fact that the cream rises to the top and the people who have money and prestigious positions are the ones who are capable of getting the job done. Functionalists see that there are 3 things that are intertwined with each other; wealth, power, and prestige. These three things are rewards for people who are of good character, eg: people with advanced knowledge, hard workers, and people who can take on responsibility. This whole perspective is more merit based than anything and tells people in the society that they get what they earn and jobs and money are not just going to be given to them because they want those things. This theory tells that poor people are poor because they do not work hard enough or even at all and that if they work harder, they will be rewarded with more resources or money. It also says that rich people have worked very hard to get where they are and it is not just because of their desire to get what they have, they had to work also. This contributes to society due to the fact that everyone is in a different class and this states that the classes are earned and not just given, so it tells everyone that almost all positions are given do to merit and other factors that are earned. Society as a whole is the basis of where people get, it is not because the people have needs and desires that need to be satisfied.
On the other side of the spectrum, are the conflict theorists, who believe that the inequality of the resources trying to be attained is caused directly because of the wants and desires of the people who are trying to attain them. This theory is all based on a group of people in power making the other groups think that they are the best to be in power and create a false consciousness for the masses. The main group stays in power because they make all sorts of promises to the masses and deceive them at the same time. The group in power takes everything that they can from the people and tell them that this is due to another cause. A basic example is how Enron worked and how the executives spent lavishly and even got severance packages when the company went under because they were only watching out for themselves, and everyone else in the company got nothing, which was planned, but were lied to and told that they had pensions and other things to help them