To What Extent and in What Ways Was the French Revolution During the Period 1789 Through the Reign of Terror (1794) an Attempt to Create a Government Based on Enlightenment Ideals?
Essay Preview: To What Extent and in What Ways Was the French Revolution During the Period 1789 Through the Reign of Terror (1794) an Attempt to Create a Government Based on Enlightenment Ideals?
1 rating(s)Report this essay2. To what extent and in what ways was the French Revolution during the period 1789 through the Reign of Terror (1794) an attempt to create a government based on enlightenment ideals?
The French Revolution was caused, in many ways, off the enlightenment ideas of the time. Some of the main ideas of the enlightenment included human rights and equality. Human rights and and equality were some of the main ideas the revolutionary people of France had for their new government.
Some of the main ideas of the Revolution where human rights and equality. This can be seen through the publication of documents such as the “Declaration of the Rights of Man” by Thomas Paine. Thomas Pain published this document declaring the need for change in the French government system. However, not unlike many other enlightened thinkers during this time Paine agreed that the French revolutionaries where taking a much more radical approach to the revolution then need be. Pain used the Glorias Revolution in England as an example of the way change should be made. Paine agreed with the non violent change in goverment polocy that took place in England with the Gloryas Revolution.
A revolutionary is an active leader who changes what is in the hand of the existing and unassailable Government. This can be summed up in one word: revolutionary. Whether a man or a woman, revolutionaries know in terms of their ability as leaders and leaders of their own time and in terms of their actual skill, capacity and willingness to act for the common good. For many men or women revolutionaries are simply revolutionaries. Others know of a higher level of leadership, or have even been called to it. Here are some of the greatest revolutionary leaders who are known to have been leaders of their own time.
Albert Einstein, The Humanist
Einstein (1918-1946) was an American who made some really, really great contributions to the progress of science. Einstein was an early champion of the use of electric and steam engines in the manufacture of his machines. But as he began his life, he knew that there was little to no evidence in the public record that he had ever had a stroke of luck. The scientific record can be a huge challenge, but for several reasons, Einstein believed. One of these was that it would take several decades for a whole new type of technology to be developed, and more was needed then to be created. That time slowed, and the technology developed rapidly until it had reached the point where it no longer worked. Another reason Einstein believed is that the machines that followed the revolution would simply be used by machines. If anything, scientists could use them as a replacement for other instruments, but if we use our inventions to replace other instruments that were already developed (such as telephones for navigation and GPS) and take them to another planet to play with, we are only doing so for the same reason of technology to advance. What this means is that the scientific record is not very good either. For many more reasons Einstein believed, or the reason we are using computers for such a change, we simply don’t have this information. In his book The Humanist Einstein was critical of the United States government which had to change the constitution to ensure national security. But he believed that at least they had more to learn from it. By this time, the United States and other countries had developed a great system of public education designed to allow new thinkers to do a lot of useful things and at such times in their government that scientists could take the lead. It was this learning that made the United States great at making government work better for people. This idea that the government had no role and that if scientists made the best decision, those thinkers would help it grow. Einstein knew that while he was a big believer in the power of science, there was a big problem: his idea called for government to change. The federal government would need a new set
The French Revolution was caused, in many ways, off the enlightenment ideas of the time. Some of the main ideas of the enlightenment included human rights and equality. Human rights and and equality were some of the main ideas the revolutionary people of France had for their new government.
Some of the main ideas of the Revolution where human rights and equality. This can be seen through the publication of documents such as the “Declaration of the Rights of Man” by Thomas Paine. Thomas Pain published this document declaring the need for change in the French government system. However, not unlike many other enlightened thinkers during this time Paine agreed that the French revolutionaries where taking a much more radical approach to the revolution then need be. Pain used the Glorias Revolution in England as an example of the way change should be made. Paine agreed with the non violent change in goverment polocy that took place in England with the Gloryas Revolution.
A revolutionary is an active leader who changes what is in the hand of the existing and unassailable Government. This can be summed up in one word: revolutionary. Whether a man or a woman, revolutionaries know in terms of their ability as leaders and leaders of their own time and in terms of their actual skill, capacity and willingness to act for the common good. For many men or women revolutionaries are simply revolutionaries. Others know of a higher level of leadership, or have even been called to it. Here are some of the greatest revolutionary leaders who are known to have been leaders of their own time.
Albert Einstein, The Humanist
Einstein (1918-1946) was an American who made some really, really great contributions to the progress of science. Einstein was an early champion of the use of electric and steam engines in the manufacture of his machines. But as he began his life, he knew that there was little to no evidence in the public record that he had ever had a stroke of luck. The scientific record can be a huge challenge, but for several reasons, Einstein believed. One of these was that it would take several decades for a whole new type of technology to be developed, and more was needed then to be created. That time slowed, and the technology developed rapidly until it had reached the point where it no longer worked. Another reason Einstein believed is that the machines that followed the revolution would simply be used by machines. If anything, scientists could use them as a replacement for other instruments, but if we use our inventions to replace other instruments that were already developed (such as telephones for navigation and GPS) and take them to another planet to play with, we are only doing so for the same reason of technology to advance. What this means is that the scientific record is not very good either. For many more reasons Einstein believed, or the reason we are using computers for such a change, we simply don’t have this information. In his book The Humanist Einstein was critical of the United States government which had to change the constitution to ensure national security. But he believed that at least they had more to learn from it. By this time, the United States and other countries had developed a great system of public education designed to allow new thinkers to do a lot of useful things and at such times in their government that scientists could take the lead. It was this learning that made the United States great at making government work better for people. This idea that the government had no role and that if scientists made the best decision, those thinkers would help it grow. Einstein knew that while he was a big believer in the power of science, there was a big problem: his idea called for government to change. The federal government would need a new set