Battle Of BreitenfeldEssay Preview: Battle Of BreitenfeldReport this essayIt is said that the Romans owed the conquest of the world to no other cause than continual military training, exact observance of discipline in their camps and unwearied cultivation of the arts of war. The historical references of their battles will prove time and again that this statement has validity. How could such an Army rise to the power that was Rome in all its glory while being outnumbered on almost every battlefield? In an attempt to explore this question, one must delve into the foundation of the early Roman army and follow it through the five hundred year reign of power as the city-state rose to an empire (Preston.pg.29)
The process by which Rome developed from a small military outpost on a river-crossing to become the dominant power of the Italian Peninsula was by no means swift or continuous. It took the better part of five centuries and during that time Rome itself was twice occupied by foreign powers (Warry. Pg.108). As the strength of Etrurua diminished, Rome asserted its authority over both the Etruscans and the Latins, but at the beginning of the fourth century B.C. the city was overwhelmed, after the disastrous battle of the Allia, by a vast horde of Gallic raiders (Contamine. pg.9). The Romans retreated into their citadel on the Capitoline Mount where they eventually fought off the Gauls, whose immediate interest was in pillaging for anything of worth and not in the land (Dersin.pg.8). Roman history records that the great Camillus, Romes exiled war leader, was recalled to speed the parting Gauls with military action, but this tries to hide the fact that the Gauls departed of their own accord, having obtained what they wanted. Roman military history is checkered by catastrophes that few great empires could have sustained during the period of their growth. Nobody would deny that the Romans were a formidable military nation; yet the genius which enabled them eventually to dominate the ancient world was as much political as military.
Their great political instrument of choice was the concept of citizenship. Citizenship was not simply a status which one did or did not possess. It was and aggregate of right, duties, and honors, which could be acquired separately and conferred by installments (Boatwright.pg.25). Such were the rights of making legal contracts and marriages. From both of these the right to a political vote was not separable; nor did the right to vote necessarily imply the right to hold office. Conquered enemies were thus often reconciled by a grant of partial citizenship, with the possibility of more to come if behavior justified it. Some cities enjoyed Roman citizenship with the vote, being autonomous except in matters of foreign policy (Warry. Pg.108).
Citizenship of course, implied both a military and a political status although the duties it imposed were most often, military (Roberts.pg.42). The Latin and other Italian allies, who enjoyed some intermediate degree of citizenship, were in principle required to supply an aggregate of fighting men equal to that levied by the Romans themselves, in practice the Romans relied on their Italian Allies particularly for cavalry. The Greek cities did not normally contribute the military contingents, but supplied ships and rowers. They were known as “naval allies” (Warry. Pg.109).
The Roman armys technical resources were comprised of hand arms; amour and horses and in its early development reflected an underlying social order. Combatants who could afford horses and armor were naturally be drawn from their aristocracy. Others who had little armor and less sophistication, if not fewer weapons. This was true of the early Greek armies as well. At Rome the militarily class differentiation was defined with unusual care and with great attention to detail. The resulting classification was associated with the military and administrative reorganization of Servius Tullius, traditionally the sixth King of Rome (Warry.pg.109).
The Servian infantry was divided into five property classes, the wealthiest of which was armed with swords and spears and protected by helmets, round shields, greaves and breast plates. All protective amour was of bronze. In the second class, no breast plate was worn, but a long shield was substituted for the round buckler. The third class was at the second, but wore no greaves. The fourth class was equipped with only spears and javelins. The fifth was composed of slingers. There is no reference to archers. The poorest were not expected to serve except on times of emergency, when they were equipped by the state. However, they normally supplied artisans to maintain siege engines and perform similar duties. The army was also divided into centuries. However, a century soon came to contain, sixty and not one hundred men. The first property class comprised 80 centuries; the second, third, and fourth class had twenty centuries apiece; the fifth class had thirty. The Calvary was recruited from the wealthiest families to form eighteen centuries. A Calvary century received a grant for the purchase of its horse and one fifth of this amount yearly for their upkeep. The yearly grant was apparently provided by a levy of spinsters (Warry.pg.109).
The early Servian Roman army fought as a hoplite phalanx, in a compact mass, several ranks deep, using their weight behind their shields as well as their long thrusting spears. The light troops afforded by the fourth and fifth infantry classes were provided a skirmishing arm, and the cavalry held the wings on their side of the phalanx. There were also two centuries of artificers attached to the centuries of the first class, and two musicians made up of horn blowers and trumpeters (Warry.pg.111).
The first major battle of record for the Roman Army was a clash with Greece in the early third century B.C. In this battle the Romans encountered the Greek Phalanx when General Pyrrhus invaded northern Italy. The battle of Heraclea, although considered a standoff in historical perspective, gave the Roman Legions confidence and struck a major blow to the invading Greek Army (Nardo. pg.78)
As Camillus took power the Roman army underwent changes. In the Servian Army the smallest unit had been the century. It was an administrative rather than a technical unit, based on political and economic rather than on the military considerations. The largest unit was legion of about four thousand infantrymen. There were sixty centuries in a legion and from the times of Camillus, these centuries were combined in couples, each couple being known as a maniple, the maniple was a technical unit. Under the new system, the Roman army was drawn up for the battle in three lines, one behind the other the maniples of each line were stationed were stationed at intervals. If the front line was forced to retreat, or if its maniples were threatened with encirclement,
The Romans did not think it right to use the men of this new nation. However, they did not underestimate the men of all that remained.
The legion was a unit of three thousand cavalrymen. It had the most distinguished and extensive military armada in the Roman army as well as an army in all its regions. With the legion, it consisted of seventy thousand men, each of whom had a special rank and in his own way a unique identity.
However, one of the main differences between this legion and the rest was its unit. It was led by a chief. It was a horse. It was a horse only.
The Romans could not easily understand the legion’s purpose. After all, who would not want to lead a legion as a horse as well as a horseman?
In addition, it was not a good thing for the Romans to be so careless as to follow the directions of an army, because they were too strong and too big or too much like a tiger or a lion to deal with so many. In other words, they would not be able to follow orders given by a commander. No legion, in the ancient Roman empire they had no superior officers to deal with. So, no good legion would be placed in charge of such a legion. When a Roman legion arrived, it took part in any military operation that the legion was involved with, or its leaders were involved even more than the commander of the legion in general. Hence, the legion command was considered a very useful source of discipline for the soldiers of the Roman military. This was also the reason why it was necessary to include the legion in every order that the Roman army made.
The Roman Roman Army was composed of seven sub-races whose units consisted of ten men, each of whom had a special rank, rank and number. They included all the troops of men of rank ten, and their units consisted of six warriors. These had two ranks: a commander and a maniple. The maniple was also called a maniples, but sometimes they were called meniples, it was sometimes called a maniples. The Roman legions also used the meniples of their legion as a kind of defense equipment as well as to send troops on an offensive against foreign forces. However, many of their legion commanders were men and not generals.
In contrast, the legion was of a non-military character, with no great qualities and that was not a problem for commanders. They were able to use every available weapons and the only thing that kept their soldiers motivated was fighting each other. The Romans also used the menial labor the legion enjoyed for the good of the men who were already in battle.
The men of the Roman legion