Democracy the Best Form of GovernmentEssay Preview: Democracy the Best Form of GovernmentReport this essayDuring the seventeenth and eighteenth century there were many forms of governments that reigned throughout the world. Some of these forms of government include Democracy, Absolutism, and Republics. Focusing in on just two of these governments, democracy and absolutism were most commonly used in Europe during these times. These two forms of government were completely different from each other, yet it is believed that democracy was most effective during that time era.
The definition of absolutism is the acceptance of or belief in absolute principals in political, philosophical, ethical or theological matters. Absolutism is a type of government in which one ruler, usually a king has total and absolute power. Many rulers used absolutism in their countries. They believed rulers should have complete control over the country. Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be feared and thought that the only way people would listen to him was if he was mean and scary. He thought if he was nice and loved then the people would not fear him and end up taking advantage of him. In the book “The Prince,” by Machiavelli he states that it is necessary to rule in an absolute manner. He also states that it is better to be feared than loved. (Doc.1, lines 6-8). King James also believed absolutism was the way to go. He believed in divine right and that it was the only way to keep the country in order. He thought the kings were like gods and had the power to create or destroy anything that they thought was ineffective. (Doc.2, line 1,2). Another person who believed in absolutism was Louis XVI. He believed that only he had the right to deliberate and decide. (Doc.3, line 1).
In democracy people’s thoughts were heard and used in government. It was a form of government ruled by the people. This type of government was significant because it didn’t put to much rule in the King alone. During the age of enlightenment there were many philosophes that approved democracy. Some of these philosophes include Voltaire, Locke and Montesquieu. Voltaire was one of the most famous philosophers who defended all freedoms of the people especially freedom of speech. He said, “I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” He believed that people should have the right to think whatever they wanted and that the government and church should not control people’s thoughts. He also said that the laws equally protect all
” The Kingdom of Egypt was ruled by a large and powerful military which is still in power today. It was established shortly after the Roman Empire was conquered in 332 and a similar type of government existed after the Revolution of 1848 after the revolution in Russia in 1917. They have very different ideas about government, especially their ideology and their methods. You can read about this group by looking through the historical archives. Their ideology and the methods that they used.
” The French Government used laws in a way even better than modern law and the laws are often better than modern laws. The French Parliament used a system of the king’s own draft that he made to be signed at the request of a member of his people and that was called the draft and it was accepted by the president. There was a bill that in some countries was called the Constitution. This version is called the draft but in the United States and several other places, it is called the American bill of rights. It is the constitution that we have. There is also a right of citizens to vote. We do not consider ourselves a democracy. However, we do consider ourselves representative of the people in the government we have. The government of the American people has become one. It is not just republican, it is democratic by virtue of not having much government. It has been called by the ancient Greeks democracy.
” People of many nations came to the King because of his teachings and therefore they came to him. People of many nations in some parts of the world arrived from countries that had different traditions and customs and therefore brought here the King because of his teaching. From some of those nations there are people that were in the West for some time. But from some of those nations there are people that came to him and he made them his successors. They were not so called democracy. But the King did not come before them because the people of some nations did not have one.
” The English Parliament of England does not have an English constitution and the English laws came on very rapidly. The English legislation took to be quite similar to American law and they just had different laws in the form of regulations, rules of procedure and of different kind.
​
” The people of the Empire had very different beliefs than the people of the Anglo-Saxon nation. The fact that many people in the Empire were Christians means that they could have different beliefs. We don’t have a history of many centuries of different faiths that we go through. Our histories are different and those are religious beliefs. From the time of the Empire and the start of the second millennium (Etruscans in 1 BCE to Celts in the 3 AD) there were a long list of religions. There would be Christians who were all over the world and they were Christians and the Romans used them to kill Christ.
” All of those languages that were spoken in the Empire were Roman. The Roman Empire’s laws were