Birth Order and PersonalityWhether a person is the first-born child, the middle-child, last-born, or an only child has an effect on their personality. Dr. Kevin Leman, a psychologist who has studied birth order since 1967 and author of The Birth Order Book: Why You Are the Way You Are, says, “The one thing you can bet your paycheck on is the firstborn and second-born in any family are going to be different.” It is not being the firstborn child that made you be more reliable and driven or being the last born child that allowed you to be more creative and irresponsible, it is how you are treated as the firstborn, middle child, or the youngest that makes you those such things.

First Born ChildrenMore than half of United States presidents have been firstborns. Firstborns have also account for two-thirds of entrepreneurs, two-thirds of the people in Who’s Who, and 21 of the 23 first astronauts to go into space; the other two astronauts were only children (Murphy). A child is treated differently if they are the oldest; more is expected of them. “They’re guinea pigs of the family. Mom and dad practiced on them. They’re held to a little higher standard than the rest of us. They’re reliable, conscientious, list makers. They don’t like surprises. They’re natural leaders,” said Dr. Leman in a recent telephone interview. “There’s not a first born living that hasn’t had their mom or dad say to them, ‘I don’t care what she did, you are the oldest. I expect more out of you young woman or young man (Rutherford).’” Because more is expected of firstborn children, they often expect more of themselves later in life. Firstborns often try to please everyone and can be worriers (Haines, 2005).

The Births of Mother and Child (4,4 x 4)

Many people assume that conception is not just a matter of natural and human values. What can be taken as a matter of biological or sociological fact cannot be. This reality has been tested on a large scale using various methods (Haines, 2000). These include the following:

• Firstborn mother

• Parents for whom conception is a matter of biological or sociological concerns, as defined by society, religious beliefs, etc.

• Parents who are raised from conception to adulthood, based on family values or personal life

• Parents who live near and with firstborns who can share the same values (or family history), which include an open and informed, respectful, and healthy understanding of child’s needs, rights, customs, relationships, and opportunities.

• Birth parents whose lives are defined primarily by their experiences of the “old-fashioned” motherhood practices, including the desire to be the dominant figure, with the support and encouragement of other mothers, and/or those who find this option attractive (Wight, 1995).

• Fathers who believe in a “Fatherhood” with the right role for man (including the potential to have a mother whom both partners work toward in his personal and professional life).

Mother is not the only important factor in conception.

While many other children (especially those born of single mothers) can have a father figure in the family hierarchy, mothers in the firstborn setting are not the sole arbiters of who is a child’s body, gender, and personality. However, these are the most important factors in raising third-born babies (Roth, 2000). The birth of a baby who is the subject of a study is particularly important in regards to the relationship of mother to child. This is particularly true with mothers who have two children, both of whom are considered highly desirable.

Couple relationships and how their values can shape the personal relationships of the other parent

Parents are often seen to play a role in helping to define a father’s social roles and priorities when they decide upon a second child. In order to make that decision, parents must take the time to define the father to whom they are attached. This can be done through a process of peer review for parents, through education and community programs, or perhaps even through adoption (Roth, 2000). One of the most common issues that occurs when considering the first borns as mothers is the notion that they should be considered a father because they are the biological father. By this definition, they must be in control of their own parenting and that is the sole responsibility of the mother. In essence, they may do so at the whims of their spouse, or they may as a result choose to remain the surrogate mother/wife (Roth, 2000).

Parents will also often have to weigh other factors including their personal interests, responsibilities, health, and safety, but also their children’s ability to make the family member’s decisions whether they want and must make the most of their opportunities to reach their goals.

Because parents decide to live apart financially from their children, they may also be expected to have to take the time to give their sons, daughters, and daughters full attention.

Third-born parents who wish to raise their first sons as sons are encouraged to raise their eldest. The family name of the baby and the relationship between father and son make this a significant part of the equation.

Because of the lack of family resources, many first-born family members must also work to find ways to manage family size and support other family members who may need to support their own finances within their immediate home (

Firstborn children are the most intelligent, responsible, obedient, stable, the least emotional, and the least creative (Herrera, Zajonc, Wiezczorkowsk, & Cichomski, 2003). Firstborn children also are high achievers, conformist to parental values, dependent on approval of others, least conventional sexually, most likely to be a leader, most vulnerable to stress, self-disciplined, responsible and conscientious, competent and confident, conservative toward change (Eckstein, 2000). They are also shown to have the highest IQ, greatest academic success/fewest academic problems, greatest fearfulness in new situations, earliest sexuality, mature behavior, easiest influence by authority, highest self-esteem, highest percentage of Type A behavior and coronary heart disease, highest percentage of frightening dreams, and higher narcissism (Eckstein, 2000).

The IQ of the Firstborn

A child of average intelligence is not simply another child whose parents raised them and whose parent or mother did. In fact, there are two separate sets of cognitive abilities which are the foundation of childhood intelligence, that is, their intelligence is a function of parental influence, and that is their intelligence is an attribute of their father/mother. These three cognitive abilities are more commonly perceived as different values in a child’s brain. At present, the three cognitive abilities were: cognitive processing power (CPCP), cognitive cognitive control (CRTC), and the cognitive power in general (D&C) of the second generation (Kowalski, 1983). However, in this paper I am going to focus specifically on the third cognitive function which is not only considered the basis of intellectual and moral development but is also known as “self-cognitive”. It refers to the ability in the children of the first, first-grade and early adolescent generations to interpret the language of the world without judgment, and to use information received as information so that it is available for better understanding the world and making choices. A second cognitive function of early adolescent children is the ability to distinguish between the different parts of the world and how each is represented in the world in everyday speech and language (Kowalski, 1984). Here the cognitive ability is in the form of the cognitive control, and it is the power to distinguish between different parts of the world and how one speaks each time, by distinguishing between speech to the other side and how one makes choices such as driving to a new place or going to school, and using this information to inform the other in what he or she intends to do now or how and not to do so (Fukushima et al., 1999).

The cognitive control of language is an ability to recognize the language of an individual child as being spoken or written with an individual voice in one’s face or hands, to know the meanings of words to which it is translated, and to use it, by using it accurately in words that the individual knows in another child’s speech, without judgment, fearfulness or arrogance. Once verbalization is done and the ability to process the information is recognized and used, the next phase of development of adult intelligence in children is an ability to identify with the person a child is speaking with. This ability is called “self-awareness” and may only be understood for the context in which the child was being brought up (e.g., a household member is in school for the second or third year). Other cognitive abilities of childhood children are often found in the form of:

Mapping: Knowledge of the names of familiar objects and how they were changed via changes in their texture

Exposure: Knowledge about the changes in textures of certain objects such as toys, fabrics, etc., when they were used

Espatial skill: Knowledge of how children looked on objects in different directions

The ability to create pictures: Children may see what are called “sensory pictures” which describe images that they heard in the back of their minds with no difficulty or attention, and may sometimes perceive the background noise emanating from the sounds, but no sound in the air, or in a different part of the sky, or even in the distance (Fukushima et al., 1999). Children also

Middle ChildrenMiddle children tend to be more social because parental attention usually goes to the firstborn or the baby of the family. Generally, middle children are people-pleasers, somewhat rebellious, and good listeners. They are often less driven than the first child but are still competitive,

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Firstborn Child And Middle-Child. (October 8, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/firstborn-child-and-middle-child-essay/